No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Human in the loop: revolutionizing industry 5.0 with design thinking and systems thinking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This study delves into Industry 5.0's Human Centric Manufacturing and Systems (HCM and HCS), emphasizing worker welfare and sustainability. Industry 5.0 advocates a human-centric approach, built upon three foundational pillars safety, inclusivity, and empowerment. The paper highlights the successful integration of Design and Systems Thinking in HCM and proposes a workshop at MADE COMPETENCE CENTRE proving the effectiveness in raising awareness and promoting Human-Centric principles throughout the system life cycle and in achieving Human-Centric Systems (HCS).
Keywords
- Type
- Design Organisation, Collaboration and Management
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Acerbi, F., Rossi, M. and Terzi, S. (2022), “Identifying and Assessing the Required I4.0 Skills for Manufacturing Companies’ Workforce”, Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R.D. and Wade, J.P. (2015), “A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 44, pp. 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. (1950), “An Outline of General System Theory”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, [Oxford University Press, The British Society for the Philosophy of Science], Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 134–165.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1992), Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, Design Issues, The MIT Press, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Camacho, M. (2016), “David Kelley: From Design to Design Thinking at Stanford and IDEO”, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 88–101.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2001), “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science”, Design Issues, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dautaj, M. and Rossi, M. (2022), “Towards a New Society: Solving the Dilemma Between Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0”, in Canciglieri Junior, O., Noël, F., Rivest, L. and Bouras, A. (Eds.), Product Lifecycle Management. Green and Blue Technologies to Support Smart and Sustainable Organizations, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dautaj, M., Callupe, M., Rossi, M. and Terzi, S. (2023), “Designing a human-centric manufacturing system from a skills-based perspective”, IFIP 20th International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, Montreal.Google Scholar
Ing, D. (2013), “Rethinking Systems Thinking: Learning and Coevolving with the World”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 (2018): Systems and Software Engineering - Life Cycle Processes - Requirements Engineering, The International Organization for Standardization, The International Electrotechnical Commission, and The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 (2023): Systems and Software Engineering - Life cycle management - Part 2, System Life Cycle Processes, The International Organization for Standardization, The International Electrotechnical Commission, and The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
Kadir, B.A. and Broberg, O. (2021), “Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0”, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R., Gupta, P., Singh, S. and Jain, D. (2021a), “Human Empowerment by Industry 5.0 in Digital Era: Analysis of Enablers”, in Phanden, R.K., Mathiyazhagan, K., Kumar, R. and Paulo Davim, J. (Eds.), Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering, Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp. 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R., Gupta, P., Singh, S. and Jain, D. (2021b), “Human Empowerment by Industry 5.0 in Digital Era: Analysis of Enablers”, Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering, pp. 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wuest, T., et al. . (2022), “Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 65, pp. 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Zheng, P., Liu, S., Wang, Z., Wang, X.V., Zheng, L. and Wang, L. (2023), “Proactive human–robot collaboration: Mutual-cognitive, predictable, and self-organising perspectives”, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Elsevier Ltd, 1 June.Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Zheng, H., Chand, S., Xia, W., Liu, Z., Xu, X., Wang, L., et al. . (2022), Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 62, pp. 612–627.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H. (2008), Thinking in Systems, edited by Wright, D., 1st edition., Chelsea Green Pub Co, London.Google Scholar
Mühlemeyer, C. (2020), “Assessment and Design of Employees-Cobot-Interaction”, in Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S. and Choplin, A. (Eds.), Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 771–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D.A. (2013), The Design of Everyday Things, edited by Kelleher, T., Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Pokorni, B., Zwerina, J. and Hämmerle, M. (2020), “Human-centered design approach for manufacturing assistance systems based on Design Sprints”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 91, Elsevier B.V., pp. 312–318.Google Scholar
Rada, M. (2015), INDUSTRY 5.0 - from virtual to physical [online]. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/industry-50-from-virtual-physical-michael-rada/ (accessed 22.11.2023)Google Scholar
Senge, P.M. and Sterman, J.D. (1992), Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.59 No.1,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillitto, H., Martin, J., Mckinney, D., Griego, R., Dori, D., Krob, D., Godfrey, P., et al. . (2019), Systems Engineering and System Definitions.Google Scholar
Tisch, M., Hertle, C., Abele, E., Metternich, J. and Tenberg, R. (2016), “Learning factory design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 29 No. 12, pp. 1355–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, D.D., Shortell, T.M., Roedler, G.J., Delicado, B.A., Mornas, O., Yew-Seng, Y. and Endler, D. (2023), SYSTEMS ENGINEERING HANDBOOK, San Diego.Google Scholar
Weinberg, G.M. (2001), An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, Dorset House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access