Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-vcmr7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-06T10:14:21.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTEGRATING SENSORS IN PRODUCTS: A NEW TOOL FOR DESIGN EDUCATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Tristan Briard ,
Camille Jean ,
Améziane Aoussat  and
Philippe Véron
Tristan Briard*
Affiliation:
LCPI, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM Université, Paris, France; LISPEN, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM Université, Aix-en-Provence, France
Camille Jean
Affiliation:
LCPI, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM Université, Paris, France;
Améziane Aoussat
Affiliation:
LCPI, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM Université, Paris, France;
Philippe Véron
Affiliation:
LISPEN, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM Université, Aix-en-Provence, France
*
Briard, Tristan, École nationale supérieure d'arts et métiers (ENSAM), France, tristan.briard@ensam.eu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper present a pedagogical tool to address a lack of creative approach in traditional education on embedded sensors. The tool is built in a systematic way from the data sheet information of a large number of different sensors. The tool presents the main monitoring capabilities of embedded sensors on cards to assist students in the creative stages of product design. An experiment was conducted to test its educational potential with 30 Masters students in product design. The statistical analysis on the experiment data indicate that the tool enables the improvement of knowledge on embedded sensors, with a more significant gain in advanced thinking skills. Finally, the tool is easy to implement in product design education and accessible to a wide range of students.

Keywords

Design educationCreativityEarly design phasesDesign learningBig data

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2345 - 2354
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abichandani, P., Sivakumar, V., Lobo, D., Iaboni, C., Shekhar, P., 2022. Internet-of-Things Curriculum, Pedagogy, and Assessment for STEM Education: A Review of Literature. IEEE Access 10, 38351–38369. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3164709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramovici, M., Göbel, J.C., Savarino, P., 2017. Reconfiguration of smart products during their use phase based on virtual product twins. CIRP Annals 66, 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W., Darling, D. A., 1952. Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23 (2), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briard, T., Jean, C., Aoussat, A., Véron, P., 2023. Challenges for data-driven design in early physical product design: A scientific and industrial perspective. Computers in Industry 145, 103814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briard, T., Jean, C., Aoussat, A., Véron, P., Le Cardinal, J., Wartzack, S., 2021. Data-driven Design Challenges in the Early Stages of the Product Development Process. Proc. Des. Soc. 1, 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.-Y., Jin, Z.-G., 2012. Research on Key Technology and Applications for Internet of Things. Physics Procedia 33, 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3),297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalzochio, J., Kunst, R., Pignaton, E., Binotto, A., Sanyal, S., Favilla, J., Barbosa, J., 2020. Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Current status and challenges. Computers in Industry 123, 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, A., Schöggl, J.-P., Reyes, T., Baumgartner, R.J., 2021. Sustainable product development in a circular economy: Implications for products, actors, decision-making support and lifecycle information management. Sustainable Production and Consumption 26, 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Abd, M., 2017. A Review of Embedded Systems Education in the Arduino Age: Lessons Learned and Future Directions. Int. J. Eng. Ped. 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschka, H., 1983. Creativity techniques in product planning and development: A view from West Germany. R & D Management 13, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1983.tb01143.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorkovenko, K., Burnett, D.J., Thorp, J.K., Richards, D., Murray-Rust, D., 2020. Exploring The Future of Data-Driven Product Design, in: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, L., Jiao, R.J., 2020. Data-informed inverse design by product usage information: a review, framework and outlook. J Intell Manuf 31, 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01463-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. and Lachenbruch, P.A., 2005. Paired t Test. In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics (eds Armitage, P. and Colton, T.). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a15112Google Scholar
Hunter, J.D., 2007. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, O., Eckert, C., 2020. Product Development 2040. The Design Society. https://doi.org/10.35199/report.pd2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, A.D., Gupta, S.M., 2019. Evaluation of design alternatives of End-Of-Life products using internet of things. International Journal of Production Economics 208, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, P., van der Vegte, W.F., Hribernik, K., Klaus-Dieter, T., 2019. Towards an Approach Integrating Various Levels of Data Analytics to Exploit Product-Usage Information in Product Development. Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des. 1, 2627–2636. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krathwohl, D.R., 2002. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice 41, 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Zhao, L., 2015. Big Data in product lifecycle management. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81, 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7151-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Rosén, A., 2020a. Cdio Standards 3.0 – Updates To The Core Cdio Standards 18.Google Scholar
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Hugo, R., Campbell, D., 2020b. Optional Cdio Standards 13.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., 1994. Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. 2014 How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review 92 (11), 64–88.Google Scholar
Raikar, M.M., Desai, P., Vijayalakshmi, M., Narayankar, P., 2018. Upsurge of IoT (Internet of Things) in engineering education: A case study, in: 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp. 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2018.8554546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, R., Warren, J.P., 2019. Card-based design tools: a review and analysis of 155 card decks for designers and designing. Design Studies 63, 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teikari, P., Najjar, R.P., Malkki, H., Knoblauch, K., Dumortier, D., Gronfier, C., Cooper, H.M., 2012. An inexpensive Arduino-based LED stimulator system for vision research. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 211, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.09.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terzi, S., Bouras, A., Dutta, D., Garetti, M., Kiritsis, D., 2010. Product lifecycle management - from its history to its new role. IJPLM 4, 360. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLM.2010.036489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovey, M., 2015. Developments in Design Pedagogy. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, September 2015, University Of Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
Ullman, D., 2009. The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Vallat, R., 2018. Pingouin: statistics in Python. JOSS 3, 1026. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gundy, A.B., 2005. 101 activities for teaching creativity and problem solving. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
van der Vegte, W.F., Kurt, F., Şengöz, O.K., 2019. Simulations Based on Product-Usage Information From Connected Products to Support Redesign for Improved Performance: Exploration of Practical Application to Domestic Fridge-Freezers. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 19, 031003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Liu, Y., Sakao, T., Huisingh, D., 2017. A framework for Big Data driven product lifecycle management. Journal of Cleaner Production 159, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Chen, C.-H., Pheng Khoo, L., 2019. A survey of smart product-service systems: Key aspects, challenges and future perspectives. Advanced Engineering Informatics 42, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhonggen, Y., 2019. A Meta-Analysis of Use of Serious Games in Education over a Decade. International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4797032CrossRefGoogle Scholar