Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T07:48:55.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integration of product development data for further ontological utilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Jessica Pickel*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Sebastian Bickel
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Stefan Goetz
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Sandro Wartzack
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The amount of data within the product development process requires a structured approach to coordinate them. Knowledge management solutions, such as ontologies, are a suitable way of linking data and representing semantic relationships. However, making all relevant data usable to ensure their target-oriented application is still a challenge. Thus, this contribution presents an approach to identify and classify heterogeneous data in product development. Besides this single ontology approach, interface solutions for data integration into an ontology are proposed.

Type
Design Information and Knowledge
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Ahmad, K. and Gilliam, L. (2005), “Automatic Ontology Extraction from Unstructured Text”, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, Agia Napa, Cyprus, October 31 - November 4, 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3761, pp. 1330-1346. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575801_25Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. and Štorga, M. (2009), “Merged ontology for engineering design: Contrasting empirical and theoretical approaches to develop engineering ontologies”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 391407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrouch, S. and Mostefai, S. (2012), “Survey on the literature of ontology mapping, alignment and merging”, International Conference on Information Technology and e-Services, Sousse, Tunisia, March 24-26, 2012, IEE, pp. 15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITeS.2012.6216651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbau, R., Krima, S., Rachuri, S., Narayanan, A., Fiorentini, X., Foufou, S. and Sriram, R.D. (2012), “OntoSTEP: Enriching product model data using ontologies”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 575590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittel, V. (2014), Semantische Informationsintegration - Konzeption eines auf Beschreibungslogiken basierenden Integrationssystems für die Produktentwicklung, [PhD Thesis], Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT). https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000041607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordes, A., Weston, J., Collobert, R. and Bengio, Y. (2011), “Learning Structured Embeddings of Knowledge Bases”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, USA, August 7-11, 2011, AAAI Press, Palo Alto, pp. 301306. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussuge, F., Tierney, C.M., Vilmart, H., Robinson, T.T., Armstrong, C.G., Nolan, D.C., Léon, J.-C. and Ulliana, F. (2019), “Capturing simulation intent in an ontology: CAD and CAE integration application”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 30 No. 10-12, pp. 688725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2019.1630806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Frank, A., Hartung, M. and Racioppa, S. (2008), “Ontology-based information extraction and integration from heterogeneous data sources”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 66 No. 11, pp. 759788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasegaran, S.K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R.D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R.F. and Gao, W. (2013), “The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 204228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworschak, F., Kügler, P., Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2019), “Integrating the Mechanical Domain into Seed Approach”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, Netherlands, August 05-08, 2019, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25872596. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.265Google Scholar
Euzenat, J. and Shvaiko, P. (2013), Ontology Matching: Second Edition, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahad, M. (2023), “Ontology-based Mediation with Quality Criteria”, 8th International Conference on Business Intelligence (CBI 2023), Istanbul, Turkey, July 19-12, 2023, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp. 115. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.00830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnelo, M. and Shanahan, M. (2019), “Reconciling deep learning with symbolic artificial intelligence: representing objects and relations”, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 29, pp. 1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, T.R. (1993), “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications”, Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 199220. https://doi.org/10.1006/KNAC.1993.1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S. and Sure, Y. (2008), Semantic Web, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33994-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, H. J. ter (2005), “Completeness, decidability and complexity of entailment for RDF Schema and a semantic extension involving the OWL vocabulary”, Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3, Vol. 3 No. 2-3, pp. 79115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2005.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imane, Z., Souhail, S., Ibtissam, E.-H., El-Moukhtar, Z. and Mohammed, D. (2021), “Using Ontologies to Improve New Product Development Process - Case Study”, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Integrated Design and Production, Fez, Morocco, October 14-16, 2019, Springer Cham, pp. 249260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62199-5_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestel, P., Kügler, P., Zirngibl, C., Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2019), “Ontology-based approach for the provision of simulation knowledge acquired by Data and Text Mining processes”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 39, pp. 292305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, A. (2014), Entwicklung einer Wissensbasis für die Arbeit mit Produktmodellen, [PhD Thesis], Lehrstuhl für Produktentwicklung, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
Korel, L., Yorsh, U., Behr, A.S., Kochkmann, N. and Holeňa, M. (2023), “Text-to-Ontology Mapping via Natural Language Processing with Application to Search for Relevant Ontologies in Catalysis”, Computers, Vol. 12 (1) No. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12010014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kügler, P., Kestel, P., Schon, C., Marian, M., Schleich, B., Staab, S. and Wartzack, S. (2018), “Ontology-based Approach for the Use of Intentional Forgetting in Product Development”, in Proceedings of the 15th International DESIGN Conference, 21.-24.05.2018, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, pp. 15951606. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X., Zhang, L., Li, M., Zhang, H. and Wang, D. (2005), “Boosting image classification with LDA-based feature combination for digital photograph management”, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 887901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2004.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyu, G., Chu, X. and Xue, D. (2017), “Product modeling from knowledge, distributed computing and lifecycle perspectives: A literature review”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 84, pp. 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, M. (2007), “Ontology Mapping: An Information Retrieval and Interactive Activation Network Based Approach”, Lecture notes in Computer Science Vol. 4825, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 931935. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musen, M.A. (2015), “The Protégé Project: A Look Back and a Look Forward”, AI Matters, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757001.2757003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natho, N. (2005), Eine semantische Analyse der mathematischen Sprache für ein computergestütztes Information Retrieval System, [PhD Thesis], Technische Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Owen, R. and Horváth, I. (2002), “Towards product-related knowledge asset warehousing in enterprises”, Proceedings of the TMCE 2002, Wuhan, China, April 22-26, 2002, pp. 155-170.Google Scholar
Perzylo, A., Somani, N., Rickert, M. and Knoll, A. (2015), “An ontology for CAD data and geometric constraints as a link between product models and semantic robot task descriptions”, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, September 28 - October 02, 2015, IEEE, pp. 41974203. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protégé Project, (2022), Cellfie Plugin. [online] GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/protegeproject/cellfie-plugin (accessed 10.09.2023).Google Scholar
Rachuri, S., Subrahmanian, E., Bouras, A., Fenves, S.J., Foufou, S. and Sriram, R.D. (2008), “Information sharing and exchange in the context of product lifecycle management: Role of standards”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 40 No. 7, pp. 789800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2007.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, G. and Raimond, Y. (2014), RDF 1.1 Primer. [online] W3C OWL Working Group Note. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/ (accessed 15.10.2023).Google Scholar
Štorga, M., Andreasen, M.M. and Marjanović, D. (2010), “The design ontology: Foundation for the Design Knowledge Exchange and Management”, in Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 21, pp. 427454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802322557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subhashini, R. and Akilandeswari, J. (2011), “A Survey on Ontology Construction Methodologies”, International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, Vol 1. No. 1, pp. 6072.Google Scholar
Temal, L., Dojat, M., Kassel, G. and Gibaud, B. (2008), “Towards an ontology for sharing medical images and regions of interest in neuroimaging”, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 766778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VDI (2009), VDI 5610-2: Wissensmanagement im Ingenieurwesen - Wissensbasierte Konstruktion (KBE), Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Berlin.Google Scholar
VDI (2019), VDI 2221-1: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme: Modell der Produktentwicklung, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wache, H., Vögele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H. and Hübner, S. (2001), “Ontology-based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches”, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, USA, August 4-5, 2001, pp. 108-117.Google Scholar