Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:35:39.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LINKING CROSS-DOMAIN INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Julian Baschin ,
Ronald Schmidt ,
David Schneider ,
Thomas Vietor  and
Umut Volkan Kizgin
Julian Baschin*
Affiliation:
TU Braunschweig;
Ronald Schmidt
Affiliation:
fme AG
David Schneider
Affiliation:
TU Braunschweig;
Thomas Vietor
Affiliation:
TU Braunschweig;
Umut Volkan Kizgin
Affiliation:
TU Braunschweig;
*
Baschin, Julian, TU Braunschweig, Germany, j.baschin@tu-braunschweig.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Due to an expanding number of mechatronic functionalities in modern technical products, the proportion of software and electronic components is also increasing. As a result, the products are developed by different engineering domains in complex development processes. To handle the growing complexity, Systems Engineering (SE) is increasingly important for development organizations of enterprises. System Engineering (SE) is understood as an approach to network the individual engineering domains and shall lead to a collaborative development of complex systems. Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE) expands SE by using common models and software tools to describe und visualize the systems. However, MBSE is not widely established in enterprises today. On the one hand, the introduction requires a distinct and consistent system understanding and collaborative way of working. On the other hand, the application of the existing tools requires extensive tool competencies due to many possible functions and features. Therefore, this paper presents a concept and a software based tool for a lean implementation of SE/MBSE to support the collaborative development of complex technical systems in small and medium-sized enterprieses.

Keywords

Systems Engineering (SE)Product modelling / modelsProcess modellingFunctional modellingDesign methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2455 - 2464
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Alt, O. (2012), Modellbasierte Systementwicklung mit SysML, Carl Hanser, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baschin, J., Huth, T., Vietor, T. (2020), “An Approach for Systematic Planning of Project Management Methods and Project Processes in Product Development”, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM 2020), online, 14-17 December 2020, IEEE, Singapore, pp. 1037–1041. 10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309809Google Scholar
Borky, J.M., & Bradley, T. H. (2019), Effective model-based systems engineering, Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J., Zanker, W. (2004), “Change and customisation in complex engineering domains”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 15, No. 1, Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00163-003-0031-7 (25th November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0031-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., & Steiner, R. (2015), A practical guide to SysML: The systems modeling language, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Steffen, D., Czaja, A., Wiederkehr, O., & Tschirner, C. (2015), Systems Engineering in der industriellen Praxis, IEM Fraunhofer. Available at: https://www.iem.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iem/de/documents/Studie%20Systems%20Engineering_deutsch.pdf (25th February 2019).Google Scholar
Haberfellner, R., de Weck, O., Fricke, E., & Vössner, S. (2019), Systems engineering, Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, T., Inkermann, D., Wilms, R., & Vietor, T. (2018), “Model-based process engineering - an approach to integrated product system and process modelling”, Tag des Systems Engineerings, 5-7 November 2018, tdse, Berlin.Google Scholar
Huth, T., Vietor, T. (2020), „Systems Engineering in der Produktentwicklung: Verständnis, Theorie und Praxis aus ingenieurswissenschaftlicher Sicht“, Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), Vol. 51, No. 1, Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11612-020-00505-1 (25th November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-020-00505-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INCOSE (2022), Systems Engineering. International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE), Available at: https://www.incose.org/about-systems-engineering/system-and-se-definition/systems-engineering-definition (25th November 2022).Google Scholar
Kauffeld, S., Paulsen, H. (2018), Kompetenzmanagement in Unternehmen. Kompetenzen beschreiben, messen, entwickeln und nutzen, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. N. (1996), Systems Engineering Guidebook: A Process for Developing Systems and Products, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Noël, F., Roucoules, L. (2008), “The PPO design model with respect to digital enterprise technologies among product life cycle”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 139–145, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09511920701607782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Object Management Group (2017a), OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML™), OMG. Available at: https://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.5/ (25th November 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Object Management Group (2017b), OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), OMG. Available at: https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/ (25th November 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropohl, G. (1975), Systemtechnik – Grundlagen und Anwendung, Hanser, Munich.Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (2012), Allgemeine Systemtheorie: Einführung in transdisziplinäres Denken, edition sigma, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, T., Raulf, C., Kizgin, V., Huth, T., Vietor, T. (2021), “A Cross-domain System Architecture Model of Dynamically Configurable Autonomous Vehicles”, Proceedings of 21st Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium, Stuttgart, Germany, 30-31 March 2021, Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33521-2_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G. J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D., Shortell, T.M. (2015), INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, INCOSE, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar