Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-08T06:16:35.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Requirements elicitation in board game design for children with developmental language disorder (DLD)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Edward Abela ,
Emanuel Balzan ,
Philip Farrugia ,
Donia Stellini  and
Daniela Gatt
Edward Abela*
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Emanuel Balzan
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Philip Farrugia
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Donia Stellini
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Daniela Gatt
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
*
edward.abela@um.edu.mt

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Developmental Language Disorders (DLDs) affects a significant number of children during early childhood. Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) are vital in providing the adequate treatment through Speech and Language Therapeutic Toys (SALTTs) including board games, which have substantial benefits for children undergoing therapy. However, designers require support in designing board games which specifically target child therapy. A framework is proposed to assist designers in designing more efficient, inclusive and usable games which in turn are aligned with therapy goals defined by SLPs.

Keywords

design activitiesboard game designuser experience

Information

Type
Design for Healthcare
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1547 - 1556
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Zaki, Ahmad, Tengku Wook, N. A., & Ahmad, T. S. M. T. W., K. (2017). Therapeutic serious game design guidelines for stimulating cognitive abilities of children with speech and language delay. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 16, 284–312. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2017.16.2.5Google Scholar
Allen, L., & Kelly, B. B. (2015). Transforming the Workforce for Children Birth Through Age 8: A Unifying Foundation. National Academies Press (US), https://doi.org/10.17226/19401Google Scholar
Balzan, E. (2022). An affordance-based design task clarification framework for speech and language therapeutic toys, University of Malta, https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106690Google Scholar
Balzan, E., Farrugia, P., & Casha, O. (2021). A User-Centred Design Framework for the Development of Speech and Language Therapeutic Toys. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzan, E., Farrugia, P., Wirth, L., Casha, O., & Gatt, D. (2022). An Affordance-Based Requirements Approach for Developing Therapeutic Artefacts—A Case Study of Speech and Language Toys. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2023.S6.13-24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elo, C., Inkinen, M., Autio, E., Vihriälä, T., & Virkki, J. (2022). The Role of Games in Overcoming the Barriers to Paediatric Speech Therapy Training (pp. 181–192). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22124-8_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaina, R. D., Balla, M., Dockhorn, A., Montoliu, R., & Perez-Liebana, D. (2020). Design and Implementation of TAG: A Tabletop Games Framework, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.12065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadi, A. (2019). Improving the communication for children with speech disorder using the smart toys, https://doi.org/10.5121/ijaia.2019.10303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloep, L., Helten, A.-L., & Peifer, C. (2023). A Playful Way to Promote Team Flow: Evaluation of a Positive Psychological Board Game for Team Building. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 8(2), 405–427, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-023-00096-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research.Google Scholar
Laasonen, M., Smolander, S., Lahti-Nuuttila, P., Leminen, M., Lajunen, H.-R., Heinonen, K., Pesonen, A.-K., Bailey, T. M., Pothos, E. M., Kujala, T., Leppänen, P. H. T., Bartlett, C. W., Geneid, A., Lauronen, L., Service, E., Kunnari, S., & Arkkila, E. (2018). Understanding developmental language disorder - the Helsinki longitudinal SLI study (HelSLI): A study protocol. BMC Psychology, 6, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0222-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, J., Dennis, J. A., & Charlton, J. J. (2017). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and/or language disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(1), CD012490. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012490Google Scholar
Noda, S., Shirotsuki, K., & Nakao, M. (2019). The effectiveness of intervention with board games: A systematic review. Biopsychosocial Medicine, 13, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0164-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, D., & Holmes, P. (2022). The Power of Board Games for Multidomain Learning in Young ChildrenGoogle Scholar
Silpasuwanchai, C., Ma, X., Shigemasu, H., & Ren, X. (2016). Developing a Comprehensive Engagement Framework of Gamification for Reflective Learning, https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, A. (2015). Association of the Type of Toy Used During Play With the Quantity and Quality of Parent-Infant Communication. JAMA Pediatrics, 170, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3753Google Scholar
Sousa, M. (2023). Mastering Modern Board Game Design to Build New Learning Experiences: The MBGTOTEACH Framework. 1, 68–93. https://doi.org/10.24140/ijgsi.v1.n1.04Google Scholar
Tahir, R., & Wang, A. (2018). Codifying Game-Based Learning: The LEAGUE framework for Evaluation.Google Scholar
Tan, P. H., Ling, siew-woei, & Yee, T. (2007). Adaptive digital game-based learning framework. 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1306813.1306844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venker, C. E., & Johnson, J. R. (2022). Electronic Toys Decrease the Quantity and Lexical Diversity of Spoken Language Produced by Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Age-Matched Children With Typical Development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, C. H. T., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Board Games in Improving Pupils’ Speaking Skills: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168772CrossRefGoogle Scholar