Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T15:59:52.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responsibility Assignment in Systems Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

I. Gräßler ,
H. Thiele ,
B. Grewe  and
M. Hieb
I. Gräßler
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
H. Thiele*
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
B. Grewe
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
M. Hieb
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
*
henrik.thiele@hni.upb.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Increasing system complexity can be controlled by using systems engineering processes. INCOSE defines processes with inputs and outputs (artifacts) for this purpose. Specific SE roles are used to organize the tasks of the processes within the company. In this work, the responsibilities for artifacts are evaluated by means of the RACI scheme and examined by a cluster analysis and discussed for a SE transformation project with a German automotive OEM. As a result of the study, the optimal composition for systems engineering teams is identified and the systems engineering roles are prioritized.

Keywords

systems engineering (SE)project managementmodel-based systems engineering (MBSE)

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 1875 - 1884
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Costello, Tom (2012): RACI—Getting Projects "Unstuck”. In: IT Prof. 14 (2), 64–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2012.41.Google Scholar
Gräßler, Iris (2015): Umsetzungsorientierte Synthese mechatronischer Referenzmodelle. Implementation-oriented synthesis of mechatronic reference models. In: Fachtagung Mechatronik 2015. Dortmund, pp. 167–172.Google Scholar
Gräßler, Iris; Hentze, Julian; Oleff, Christian (2018): Systems Engineering Competencies in Academic Education. An industrial survey about skills in Systems Engineering. In: IEEE (Hg.): 13th System of Systems Engineering Conference. Paris, 2018. IEEE, pp. 542–547. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8428741Google Scholar
Gräßler, Iris; Oleff, Christian; Hentze, Julian (2019): Role Model for Systems Engineering Application. In: Design Society (Hg.): International Conference on Engineering Design 2019, Bd. 1. International Conference on Engineering Design 2019. Delft, 05.-08.08., pp. 1265–1274.Google Scholar
Gräßler, Iris; Pottebaum, Jens (2021): Generic Product Lifecycle Model: A Holistic and Adaptable Approach for Multi-Disciplinary Product–Service Systems. In: Applied Sciences 11 (10), pp. 4516. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11104516.Google Scholar
Gräßler, Iris; Pottebaum, Jens (2022): From Agile Strategic Foresight to Sustainable Mechatronic and Cyber-Physical Systems in Circular Economies. In: Dieter Krause und Emil Heyden (Hg.): Design Methodology for Future Products. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Gräßler, Iris; Wiechel, Dominik; Pottebaum, Jens (2021): Role model of model-based systems engineering application. In: IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1097 (1), S. 12003. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1097/1/012003.Google Scholar
Haberfellner, Reinhard (2012): Systems Engineering. Grundlagen und Anwendung. 12., Zürich: Orell Füssli.Google Scholar
Jacka, J. Mike, ; Keller, Paulette J. (2009): Business process mapping workbook. Improving customer satisfaction. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley., https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119198406.Google Scholar
NASA (2007): NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office (rev1).Google Scholar
Selig, Christoph J.; Baltes, Guido H. (2017): Clarifying the roles in corporate entrepreneurship. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)., Funchal, 2017: IEEE, pp. 879–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheard, Sarah A. (1996): Twelve Systems Engineering Roles. In: Proceedings of the INCOSE Sixth Annual International Symposium. Systems Engineering: Practices and Tools., Boston, Massachusetts, USA 2009: Systems Engineering Guidebook for Intelligent Transportation Systems.Google Scholar
Tealeb, Ahmed; Awad, Ahmed; Galal-Edeen, Galal (2016): Towards RAM-Based Variant Generation of Business Process Models. In: Alex, Norta, Walid Gaaloul, G. R. Gangadharan und Hoa Khanh Dam (Hg.): Service-oriented computing - ICSOC 2015 workshops, Goa, India, 2015, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (Services science, 9586), pp. 91–102.Google Scholar
United States Department of Defense (2001): Systems Engineering Fundamentals. Hg. v. Department of Defence - Systems Management College. Fort Belvour, Virginia.Google Scholar
Walden, David D.; Roedler, Garry J.; Forsberg, Kevin; Hamelin, R. Douglas; Shortell, Thomas M. (2015): Systems engineering handbook. A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, Clifford A.; White, Corina; Khan, Rabia; Grambow, Dana; Velez, Jose; Delgado, Jessica (2017): The U.S. Department of Defense Systems Engineering Competency Model. In: INCOSE International Symposium 27 (1), pp. 214–228. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00355.x.Google Scholar
White, Corina; Whitcomb, Clifford A.; Khan, Rabia; Grambow, Dana; Delgado, Jessica; Vélez, José G. (2016): Development of a Systems Engineering Career Competency Model for the U.S. Department of Defense. In: INCOSE International Symposium 26 (1), pp. 1864–1874. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00266.x.Google Scholar