Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:40:10.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STRONG SUSTAINABILITY ASPECTS IN THE IDEATION PROCESS: A PEDAGOGICAL EXPERIMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Melissa Escobar ,
Valérie Laforest ,
Nadège Troussier  and
Jenny Faucheu
Melissa Escobar*
Affiliation:
Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, CNRS, Univ Jean Monnet, Univ Lumière Lyon 2, Univ Lyon 3 Jean Moulin, ENS Lyon, ENTPE, ENSA Lyon, UMR 5600 EVS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France; Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5307 LGF, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France; ICD, CREIDD, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10 0 04 Troyes, France
Valérie Laforest
Affiliation:
Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, CNRS, Univ Jean Monnet, Univ Lumière Lyon 2, Univ Lyon 3 Jean Moulin, ENS Lyon, ENTPE, ENSA Lyon, UMR 5600 EVS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France;
Nadège Troussier
Affiliation:
ICD, CREIDD, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10 0 04 Troyes, France
Jenny Faucheu
Affiliation:
Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5307 LGF, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France;
*
Escobar, Melissa, Ecole de Mines de Saint Etienne, France, melissa.escobar.c@emse.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The progress of science and technology has considerably increased the quality of life - especially the material standard of living - (e.g. disappearance of famines, increase in life expectancy) On the other hand, climate change, reduction of biodiversity, decrease of natural resources, and increase of environmental risks are some of the consequences of this human activities. Addressing these new challenges will require holistic comprehension and actionable approaches. The mitigation of these consequences requires effective responses in terms of transition. In this context, engineering and design students need time but also adapted curricula focused on sustainability and eco design concepts to support evolution of their skills, their knowledge and their culture. This article discusses the integration of a strong sustainability knowledge within the ideation process through a pedagogical experience, in order to develop new knowledge-based approaches, methodologies and tools

Keywords

Strong SustainabilityCreativityDesign educationSustainability
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3205 - 3214
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahlborg, H., Ruiz-Mercado, I., Molander, S., Masera, O. (2019). “Bringing Technology into Social-Ecological Systems Research—Motivations for a Socio-Technical-Ecological Systems Approach”. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocken, Nancy M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). “A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes”. Journal of Cleaner Production 65, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). “Change by Design. The Journal of Product Innovation Management” 28(3), 381–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F., Gaziulusoy, I., (2019) “Design for sustainability. A Multi-level framework from products to socio-technical systems”. Routledge. London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510Google Scholar
Chaminade, (2020) “Innovation for What? Unpacking the Role of Innovation for Weak and Strong Sustainability”. (2020). Journal of Sustainability Research, 2(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200007.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). “Natural Capital and Sustainable Development”. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2385849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, HE (1999a) Wirtschaft jenseits von Wachstum: die Volkswirtschaftslehre nachhaltiger. Entwicklung. Pustet, SalzburgGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, A.; Vaishar, A.; Št'astná, M. Preparedness of Young People for a Sustainable Lifestyle: Awareness and Willingness. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedenus, F., Persson, M., & Sprei, F. (2015) History, Definition & The Role of the Engineer. GothenburgGoogle Scholar
Leach, M, et al. : “Equity and sustainability in the anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures”. Glob Sustain 2018, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, C.; Koide, R.; Akenji, L. Applying Foresight to Policy Design for a Long-Term Transition to Sustainable Lifestyles. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raworth, K: “A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live Within the Doughnut?” Available (November 2019) at: Oxford: Oxfam; 2012-https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/dp-a-safe-and-just-space-for-humanity-130212-en_5.pdf.Google Scholar
Ott, K. (2003). “The case for strong sustainability”. Greifswald's environmental ethics, 59–64.Google Scholar
Ott, K (2009) “On substantiating the conception of strong sustainability”. In: Döring, R (ed) Sustainability, natural capital and nature conservation. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 49–72Google Scholar
Ott, K, Döring, R (2008) “Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit” 2nd edition, Metropolis, Marburg.Google Scholar
Perpignan, C., Robin, V., Eynard, B., 2018. From Ecodesign to dfs in engineering Education. In: In DS 93: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2018), pp. 622–627. Raworth, K. (2012). “A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the doughnut?” Oxfam Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 674–680.Robert K-H, 2000Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., & Foley, …, A, J.. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. Steffen et al 2009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solow, R.M. (1992), “An almost practical step toward sustainability”, in Oates, W.E. (ed.), The RFF reader in environmental and resource management, Washington DC, RFF, 1999, p. 263–272.Google Scholar
Turner, R. K., & Pearce, D. W. (1993). Sustainable economic development: economic and ethical principles. In Economics and ecology (pp. 177–194). Springer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape ecology, 28(6), 999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar