Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T09:18:31.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supporting the digital thread through the principles of complementarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Yana Brovar ,
Saina Sadeghzadeh  and
Clement Fortin
Yana Brovar
Affiliation:
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia
Saina Sadeghzadeh*
Affiliation:
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia
Clement Fortin
Affiliation:
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia
*
Saina.Sadeghzadeh@skoltech.ru

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To establish a coherent Digital Thread, encompassing diverse information obtained during the design process, it is imperative to ensure the traceability of information particularly between engineering and manufacturing teams. A challenge lies in maintaining links between data, particularly in the context of configuration management. Through the principles of complementarity, we explore links between the Engineering and the Manufacturing definitions through a major structural element. We forsee the principles of complementarity as a support for Digital Thread throughout the product lifecycle.

Keywords

digital threadcomplementarityconfiguration managementdesign structure matrix (DSM)bill of materials
Type
Design Information and Knowledge
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 373 - 382
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Brovar, Y., Menshenin, Y., & Fortin, C. (2021). Study of system interfaces through the notion of complementarity. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 2751–2760. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions. In IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (Vol. 48, Issue 3).Google Scholar
Elaasar, M., and Neal, A. (2013). LNCS 8107 - Integrating Modeling Tools in the Development Lifecycle with OSLC: A Case Study. In LNCS (Vol. 8107). http://abc.com/toolB/resource/999Google Scholar
Eppinger, S. D., and Browning, T. R. (2012). Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8896.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, S., & Fortin, C. (2007). Application of the CMII model to an integrated engineering and manufacturing development environment. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 1(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-007-0002-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwin, C. H. (1979). Production Functions and Decision Models: Complementary Models. In Source: American Ethnologist (Vol. 6, Issue 4).Google Scholar
Hedberg, T. D. Jr, Bajaj, M., & Camelio, J. A. (2020). Using graphs to link data across the product lifecycle for enabling smart manufacturing digital threads. Journal of computing and information science in engineering, 20(1), 011011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, C. M., and Joan-Arinyo, R. (1998). CAD and the product master model.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), http://www.incose.org/, Accessed: February 2014.Google Scholar
Kwon, S., Monnier, L. v., Barbau, R., and Bernstein, W. Z. (2020). Enriching standards-based digital thread by fusing as-designed and as-inspected data using knowledge graphs. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, M., and Lindemann, U. (2008). The application of the Multiple-Domain Matrix: Considering multiple domains and dependency types in complex product design. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2487–2493. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2008.4811669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P, and Roberts, J. The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. Am Econ Rev. (1990) 80:511–28.Google Scholar
OSLC (2023), “Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration”. http://open-services.net/wiki (accessed 10 November2023).Google Scholar
PTC (2024) ‘Windchill PLM Software'Available online: https://www.ptc.com/en/products/plm/plm-products/windchill (accessed on 9 February 2024).Google Scholar
Steward, D. V. (1981). The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems. In IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (Issue 3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toche, B., Mcsorley, G., Pellerin, R., & Fortin, C. (2017). A framework to support collaboration during prototyping and testing. In Int. J. Product Lifecycle Management (Vol. 10, Issue 4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar