No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
TOWARDS THE DESIGN OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY SYSTEMS: OBJECTIVES AND BARRIERS FROM THE FRENCH LOCAL AUTHORITIES’ PERSPECTIVE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Within the on-going ecological transition, mobility systems are considered as sociotechnical systems that raise several challenges for local authorities due to the different levels of decision, a complex stakeholder network and the numerous objectives to be dealt with. Designers are therefore seeking to develop new frameworks to support local authorities moving towards more sustainable mobility systems. Based on the French context, this study relies on an analysis of the regulation and an interview-based survey that depict the mobility design from the local authorities’ perspective. First, it investigates the objectives defined in the law and the difficulties met by local authorities. Then, it highlights the main political, organisational, and knowledge barriers for sustainable mobility. Finally, it proposes a set of recommendations to create a framework to better define and prioritise the objectives, ensure efficient planning and monitoring, clarify the interactions between actors, and enhance mobility plans.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Al Maghraoui, O., Vallet, F., Puchinger, J. and Yannou, B. (2017), “Framing key concepts to design a human centered urban mobility system”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 3: Product, Services and Systems Design, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Auvinen, H. and Tuominen, A. (2014), “Future transport systems: long-term visions and socio-technical transitions”, European Transport Research Review, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-014-0135-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardal, K.G., Gjertsen, A. and Reinar, M.B. (2020), “Sustainable mobility: Policy design and implementation in three Norwegian cities”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 82, p. 102330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigo, A. (2020), Les transports face au défi de la transition énergétique. Explorations entre passé et avenir, technologie et sobriété, accélération et ralentissement, Économies et finances, Institut Polytechnique de Paris.Google Scholar
Bouillass, G. (2021), Sustainability assessment of electric mobility scenarios with the integration of a life cycle perspective, Engineering Sciences, MINES ParisTech - Université PSL.Google Scholar
Cluzel, F. (2012), Eco-design implementation for complex industrial system: from scenario-based LCA to the definition of an eco-innovative R&D projects portfolio, Industrial Engineering, École Centrale Paris.Google Scholar
Foussard, A. and Riedinger, N. (2019), Les émissions de CO2 liées à l’énergie en France de 1990 à 2017 - Facteurs d’évolution et éléments de comparaison internationale, Commissariat général au développement durable.Google Scholar
Government, French (1977), Code de la construction et de l'habitation, version in effect on November 29, 2022.Google Scholar
Government, French (1982), Loi n°82-1153 du 30 décembre 1982 d'orientation des transports intérieurs, version in effect on December 31, 1982.Google Scholar
Government, French (1996), Code général des collectivités territoriales, version in effect on November 29, 2022.Google Scholar
Government, French (2000), Code de l'environnement, version in effect on November 29, 2022.Google Scholar
Government, French (2010), Code des transports, version in effect on November 29, 2022.Google Scholar
Government, French (2019), Loi n°2019-1428 du 24 décembre 2019 d'orientation des mobilités, version in effect on November 29, 2022.Google Scholar
Government, French (2021), Loi n° 2021-1104 du 22 août 2021 portant lutte contre le dérèglement climatique et renforcement de la résilience face à ses effets, version in effect on November 29, 2022.Google Scholar
Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Hartmann-Petersen, K., Friis, F., Rudolf Lindberg, M. and Grindsted, T.S. (2020), “Sustainable Mobility in the Mobile Risk Society—Designing Innovative Mobility Solutions in Copenhagen”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 17, p. 7218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F.W. (2005), “Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 72 No. 6, pp. 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, E.W., van Houdenhoven, M. and Hulshof, P.J.H. (2012), “A Framework for Healthcare Planning and Control”, in Hall, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Healthcare System Scheduling, Vol. 168, Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1734-7_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joore, P. and Brezet, H. (2015), “A Multilevel Design Model: the mutual relationship between product-service system development and societal change processes”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 97, pp. 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Næss, P., Strand, A., Næss, T. and Nicolaisen, M. (2011), “On their road to sustainability? The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban planning and development in two Scandinavian capital regions”, Town Planning Review, Vol. 82 No. 3, pp. 285–316. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SDES (2018), Enquête nationale transports et déplacements (ENTD) 2008. [online] Available at: https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/enquete-nationale-transports-et-deplacements-entd-2008 (accessed 25 April 2022)Google Scholar
SDES (2021), Résultats détaillés de l'enquête mobilité des personnes de 2019. [online]. Available at: https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/resultats-detailles-de-lenquete-mobilite-des-personnes-de-2019 (accessed 25 April 2022)Google Scholar
Tietge, U., Díaz, S., Mock, P., Bandivadekar, A., Dornoff, J. and Ligterink, N. (2019), From Laboratory to Road: A 2018 Update of Official and “Real-World” Fuel Consumption and CO2 Values for Passenger Cars in Europe, The International Council on Clean Transportation.Google Scholar
Yannis, G., Kopsacheili, A., Dragomanovits, A. and Petraki, V. (2020), “State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector”, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access