Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T02:06:26.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using product profiles for retrospective case studies in SGE – system generation engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Felix Pfaff ,
Michael Schlegel ,
Thomas Alexander Völk ,
Karl Thomas Reinheckel  and
Albert Albers
Felix Pfaff*
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Michael Schlegel
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Thomas Alexander Völk
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Karl Thomas Reinheckel
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
felix.pfaff@kit.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Supporting product developers in innovating is an important task of design research. An invention and a valid need situation described through a product profile are necessary elements of innovation. But how can we derive recommendations on how to develop “innovative” products if the success of a product can only be measured retrospectively? Retrospective case studies are one approach to investigate relationships between context factors, variations in systems and product profiles, and innovation success. To investigate these, we use product profiles in case studies across system generations.

Keywords

design researchinnovationcase studyproduct development

Information

Type
Systems Engineering and Design
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 2695 - 2704
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A., Fahl, J., Hirschter, T. and Rapp, S. (2021), “Application of the generic variation operator in the model of PGE – Product Generation Engineering onto the element types of properties and functions of technical systems”, in 31st CIRP Design Conference 2021 (CIRP Design 2021), 19.-21.05.2021, Eschede, Netherlands, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 870–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.029Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Walter, B., Basedow, G., Reiss, N., Heitger, N., Ott, S. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Product Profiles: Modelling customer benefits as a foundation to bring inventions to innovations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Hirschter, T., Fahl, J., Wöhrle, G., Reinemann, J. and Rapp, S. (2020), “Generic Reference Product Model for specifying complex Products by the Example of the Automotive Industry”, TMCE, 11-15 May, 2020, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Rapp, S. (2022), “Model of SGE: System Generation Engineering as Basis for Structured Planning and Management of Development”, in Krause, D. and Heyden, E. (Eds.), Design Methodology for Future Products: Data Driven, Agile and Flexible, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Spadinger, M., Richter, T., Birk, C., Marthaler, F., Heimicke, J., Kurtz, V. and Wessels, H. (2019), “The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, Netherlands, August 5-8, Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.175Google Scholar
Arthur, W.B. (2009), The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves, Simon and Schuster, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, R. (2006), Gescheiterte Innovationen: Fehlschläge und technologischer Wandel, Zugl.: Hamburg, Helmut-Schmidt-Univ., Habil.-Schr., 2004, Campus-Forschung, Vol. 893, Campus-Verl., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, P.J. (2018), “Developing theory-driven design research”, Design Studies, Vol. 56, pp. 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Y.T. and Chen, C.-H. (2010), “Customer needs as moving targets of product development: a review”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 48 No. 1–4, pp. 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2282-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1987), “Success factors in product innovation”, Industrial Marketing Management. Vol.16, pp. 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(87)90029-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990), “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria”, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1990-0602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebel, B. (2015), “Modellierung von Zielsystemen in der interdisziplinären Produktentstehung. Dissertation”, in Albers, A. (Ed.), Forschungsberichte des IPEK - Institut für Produktentwicklung, ISSN: 1615-8113, Vol. 85, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, 6th ed., Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadatsch, A. (2019), Datenmodellierung: Einführung in die Entity-Relationship-Modellierung und das Relationenmodell, essentials, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Allan, George (2003), “A critique of using grounded theory as a research method”, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 2 No. 1.Google Scholar
Kirchner, E. and Neudörfer, A. (2021), “Grundregeln der Gestaltung”, in Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9. Aufl., Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Deutschland, pp. 467–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubin, A., Wagenmann, S., Reichert, F., Mandel, C. and Albers, A. (2023), “Stakeholder Needs in Systems Engineering: A Proposal for a Formal Definition”, in SYSCON 2023: the 17th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference: April 17-20, 2023, Vancouver, Canada conference proceedings, 4/17/2023 - 4/20/2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon53073.2023.10131072Google Scholar
Pfaff, F., Eberhardt, C., Patlakis, C., Nowak, M., Rapp, S. and Albers, A. (2022), “Descriptive model for evolutionary innovation research in Product Generation Engineering”, in The XXXIII ISPIM Innovation Conference: Innovating in a Digital World, 5-8 June, Copenhagen, Denmark, LUT Scientific and Expertise Publications. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000153615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, F., Rapp, S. and Albers, A. (2021), “Modelling and Visualizing Knowledge on the Reference System and Variations Based on the Model of PGE - Product Generation Engineering for Decision Support”, Proceedings of the Design Society. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.478Google Scholar
Ramminger, H. (1995), Turmuhren der Firma Weule im Zeitraum von 1848 bis 1952. Materialien für den Technikunterricht, Hausarbeit zur Prüfung für das Lehramt an Grund- und Hauptschulen, Universtität Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (2009), Allgemeine Technologie eine Systemtheorie der Technik, KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäschle, M., Timucin, M., Radimersky, A., Mandel, C., Fahl, J. and Hirschter, T. (2021), “Vorgehen zur systematischen Verknüpfung von Produktanforderungen und Systemarchitektur unter Berücksichtigung der PGE”, in Binz, H.-G., Spath, D. and Roth, D. (Eds.), Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2021 Stuttgart, 20. Mai 2021, Wissenschaftliche Konferenz, Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung, Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Woodside, A.G. and Wilson, E.J. (2003), “Case study research methods for theory building”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 6/7, pp. 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620310492374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2018), Case study research and applications: Design and methods, Sixth edition, Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Dehli, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne.Google Scholar