Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T12:37:36.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A statistical view of low-ionization structures in planetary nebulae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2025

M. Belén Mari Open the ORCID record for M. Belén Mari [Opens in a new window] ,
Stavros Akras Open the ORCID record for Stavros Akras [Opens in a new window]  and
Denise R. Gonçalves
M. Belén Mari*
Affiliation:
Valongo Observatory, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil email: mbmari@unc.edu.ar
Stavros Akras
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National Observatory of Athens, Greece
Denise R. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Valongo Observatory, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil email: mbmari@unc.edu.ar
*
Email: mbmari@unc.edu.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

More than three decades after the pioneering imaging catalog by Balick (1987), where the small-scale and low-ionization structures (LISs) in planetary nebulae (PNe) became evident, the present study conducts a comprehensive statistical analysis of LISs’ physical-chemical and excitation properties. Gathering the largest dataset to date, we compare LISs with high-ionization components (rims/shells) across a diverse sample of PNe. Key findings include lower electron densities (NeS ii) in LISs than in adjacent rims/shells and comparable electron temperatures (Te N ii and O iii) between these two nebular componets. Various optical diagnostic diagrams, while revealing a clear excitation stratification between these groups of components, are not good enough to clearly pinpoint the main excitation mechanism behind the LISs line-emission. Photoionization and shock models highlight a notable overlap between mechanisms, emphasizing the coexistence of both excitation processes. Contrary to expectations, shocks are unlikely to be the primary excitation source for most of LISs in PNe.

Keywords

ISM: jets and outflowsISMkinematics and dynamicsplanetary nebulae: general

Information

Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 19 , Symposium S384: Planetary Nebulae: A Universal Toolbox in the Era of Precision Astrophysics , December 2023 , pp. 156 - 162
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akras, S., Gonçalves, D. R., 2016, MNRAS, 455, 930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akras, S., Gonçalves, D. R., Ramos-Larios, G., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akras, S., Gonçalves, D. R., Ramos-Larios, G., Aleman, I., 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alarie, A., Morisset, C., 2019, RMxAA, 55, 377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, A., Dopita, M. A., 2017, PASA, 34, e036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., Terlevich, R., 1981, PASP, 93, 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balick, B., Rugers, M., Terzian, Y., Chengalur, J. N., 1993, ApJ, 411, 778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balick, B., Perinotto, M., Maccioni, A., Terzian, Y., Hajian, A., 1994, ApJ, 424, 800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balick, B., Frank, A., Liu, B., 2020, ApJ, 889, 13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. M., et al. 2017, Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. 1st Ed., 10.1201/9781351072304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, X., Guerrero, M. A., Miranda, L. F., Riera, A., Velázquez, P. F., Raga, A. C., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, X., Zhang, Y., Kwok, S., Hsia, C.-H., Chau, W., Ramos-Larios, G., Guerrero, M. A., 2018, ApJ, 859, 92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, D. R., Corradi, R. L. M., Mampaso, A., 2001, ApJ, 547, 302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, D. R., Corradi, R. L. M., Mampaso, A., Perinotto, M., 2003, ApJ, 597, 975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, D. R., Mampaso, A., Corradi, R. L. M., Perinotto, M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, D. R., Mampaso, A., Corradi, R. L. M., Quireza, C., 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, M. A., Suzett Rechy-Garca, J., Ortiz, R., 2020, ApJ, 890, 50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajian, A. R., Balick, B., Terzian, Y., Perinotto, M., 1997, ApJ, 487, 304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintze, J. L., Nelson, R. D., 1998, The American Statistician, 52, 181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, J. A., Vazquez, R., Rodriguez, L. F., 1995, Astrophys. J. Let., 455, L63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mari, M. B., Gonçalves, D. R., Akras, S., 2023a, MNRAS, 518, 3908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mari, M. B., Akras, S., Gonçalves, D. R., 2023b, MNRAS, 525, 1998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, L. F., et al., 2021, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2105.05186 Google Scholar
Morisset, C., Delgado-Inglada, G., Flores-Fajardo, N., 2015, RMxAA, 51, 103 Google Scholar
Perinotto, M., 2000, Astrophys. Space Sci., 274, 205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raga, A. C., Riera, A., Mellema, G., Esquivel, A., Velázquez, P. F., 2008, A&A, 489, 1141 Google Scholar
Sabbadin, F., Minello, S., Bianchini, A., 1977, A&A, 60, 147 Google Scholar