Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-03T03:06:37.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Circumstellar interaction in Type IIn supernovae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

Poonam Chandra ,
Roger A. Chevalier ,
Nikolai Chugai ,
Alicia M. Soderberg  and
Claes Fransson
Poonam Chandra
Affiliation:
National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, Pune University Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune-411 007, INDIA email: poonam@ncra.tifr.res.in
Roger A. Chevalier
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
Nikolai Chugai
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyatnitskaya Street 48, 109017 Moscow, Russia
Alicia M. Soderberg
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Claes Fransson
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Type IIn supernovae have bright optical emission and high bolometric luminosities. Due to their high mass loss, their are expected to have dense circumstellar interaction, thus produce bright radio and X-ray emission. We aim to carry out systematic study to understand their circumstellar interaction, mass loss properties. Here, I provide specific examples of two Type IIn supernovae, 2006jd and 2010jl.

Keywords

dense matterradiation mechanisms: generalcircumstellar matterstars: mass losssupernovae: individual (2006jd, 2010jl)

Information

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S296: Supernova Environmental Impacts , January 2013 , pp. 135 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Benetti, S., Bufano, F., Vinko, J., et al. 2010, CBET, 2536, 1Google Scholar
Blondin, S., Modjaz, M., Kirshner, R., et al. 2006, CBET, 679, 1Google Scholar
Chandra, P., Chevalier, R. A., Irwin, C. M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, L2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, P., Chevalier, R. A., Chugai, N., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 110Google Scholar
Chandra, P. & Soderberg, A. 2007, ATel, 1297, 1.Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A. & Fransson, C. 2003, in: Weiler, K. (eds.), Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters: Lecture Notes in Physics (Berlin: Springer), vol. 598, p. 171Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A. 1982, ApJ, 259, 302Google Scholar
Chugai, N. N. & Danziger, I. J. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippenko, A. V. 1997, ARAA, 35, 309Google Scholar
Fransson, C., Lundqvist, P., & Chevalier, R. A. 1996, ApJ, 461, 993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransson, C. 1982, A&A, 111, 140Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. L., Leonard, D. C., Chornock, R., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immler, S., Milne, P., & Pooley, D. 2010, ATel, 3012, 1Google Scholar
Immler, S., Brown, P. J., Filippenko, A. V., & Pooley, D. 2007, ATel, 1290, 1Google Scholar
Kallman, T. R., Palmeri, P., Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C., & Krolik, J. H. 2004, ApJS, 155, 675Google Scholar
Kiewe, M., Gal-Yam, A., Arcavi, I., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 10Google Scholar
Leonard, D. C., Filippenko, A. V., Barth, A. J., & Matheson, T. 2000, ApJ, 536, 239Google Scholar
Newton, J. & Puckett, T. 2010, CBET, 2532, 1Google Scholar
Patat, F., Taubenberger, S., Benetti, S., Pastorello, A., & Harutyunyan, A. 2011, A&A, 527, L6Google Scholar
Pooley, D., Immler, S., & Filippenko, A. V. 2007, ATel, 1023, 1Google Scholar
Pooley, D. & Lewin, W. H. G. 2004, IAU Circ., 8323, 2Google Scholar
Prasad, R. R. & Li, W. 2006, CBET, 673, 1Google Scholar
Schlegel, E. M. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 269Google Scholar
Smith, N., Li, W., Miller, A. A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 63Google Scholar
Stoll, R., Prieto, J. L., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 34Google Scholar
Stritzinger, M., Taddia, F., Fransson, C., et al. 2012, ApJ 756, 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, D. A., Ghosh, K. K., Tennant, A. F., & Wu, K. 2004, ApJS, 154, 519Google Scholar
van Dyk, S. D., Weiler, K. W., Sramek, R. A., & Panagia, N. 1993, ApJ, 419, L69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verner, D. A. & Ferland, G. J. 1996, ApJS, 103, 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., Montes, M. J., & Sramek, R. A. 2002, ARAA, 40, 387Google Scholar
Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., & Sramek, R. A. 1990, ApJ, 364, 611Google Scholar
Williams, C. L., Panagia, N., Van Dyk, S. D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 396Google Scholar