Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-02T21:47:53.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Close-up view of an ongoing merger between the NGC 4839 group and the Coma cluster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Natalia Lyskova
Affiliation:
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya str. 20, Moscow101000, Russia Space Research Institute (IKI), Profsoyuznaya str. 84/32, Moscow117997, Russia email: natalya.lyskova@gmail.com
Eugene Churazov
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute (IKI), Profsoyuznaya str. 84/32, Moscow117997, Russia email: natalya.lyskova@gmail.com Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 1, 85741Garching, Germany
Congyao Zhang
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 1, 85741Garching, Germany
William Forman
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA02138, USA
Christine Jones
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA02138, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyse archival XMM-Newton observations of the massive galaxy group NGC 4839 falling into the Coma cluster core, which reveal a complex morphology for the merger. By comparing high quality X-ray maps of the merging subcluster with SPH simulations, we propose an infall scenario which qualitatively reproduces the observed structure of the NGC 4839 tail.

References

Adami, C., Biviano, A., Durret, F., & Mazure, A., 2005, A&A, 443, 17Google Scholar
Akamatsu, H., Inoue, S., Sato, T., Matsusita, K., Ishisaki, Y., & Sarazin, C. L., 2013, PASJ, 65, 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biviano, A., Durret, F., Gerbal, D., Le Fevre, O., Lobo, C., Mazure, A., & Slezak, E., 1996, A&A, 311, 95Google Scholar
Burns, J. O., Roettiger, K., Ledlow, M., & Klypin, A., 1994, ApJ, 427, L87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, A., & Fusco-Femiano, R., 1978, A&A, 70, 677Google Scholar
Churazov, E., Gilfanov, M., Forman, W., & Jones, C., 1996, ApJ, 471, 673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colless, M., & Dunn, A. M., 1996, ApJ, 458, 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, J. M., & Lockman, F. J., 1990, ARA&A, 28, 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, D. M., et al., 2001, A&A, 365, L74 Neumann D. M., Lumb D. H., Pratt G. W., & Briel U. G., 2003, A&A, 400, 811Google Scholar
Ogrean, G. A., & Brüggen, M., 2013, MNRAS, 433, 170110.1093/mnras/stt846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collaboration, Planck, et al., 2013, A&A, 554, A140Google Scholar
Springel, V., Yoshida, N., & White, S. D. M., 2001, NewA, 6, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. K., Brickhouse, N. S., Liedahl, D. A., & Raymond, J. C., 2001, ApJ, 556, L91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W., & Jones, C., 1997, ApJ, 474, L7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Yu, Q., & Lu, Y., 2014, ApJ, 796, 138 Zhang C., Yu Q., & Lu Y., 2015, ApJ, 813, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar