Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:43:53.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comprehensive Census and Complete Characterization of Nearby Debris Disk Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

Tara H. Cotten
Affiliation:
University of Georgia email: tara@physast.uga.edu email: song@uga.edu
Inseok Song
Affiliation:
University of Georgia email: tara@physast.uga.edu email: song@uga.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Debris disks are intimately linked to planetary system evolution since the rocky material surrounding the host stars is believed to be due to secondary generation from the collisions of planetesimals. With the conclusion and lack of future large scale infrared excess survey missions, it is time to summarize the history of using excess emission in the infrared as a tracer of debris and exploit all available data as well as provide a comprehensive study of the parameters of these important objects. We have compiled a catalog of infrared excess stars from peer-reviewed articles and performed an extensive search for new debris disks by cross-correlating the Tycho-2 and AllWISE catalogs. This study will conclude following the thorough examination of each debris disk star's parameters obtained through high-resolution spectroscopy at various facilities which is currently ongoing. We will maintain a webpage (www.debrisdisks.org) devoted to these infrared excess sources and provide various resources related to our catalog creation, SED fitting, and data reduction.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Aumann, H. H., Beichman, C. A., & Gillett, F. C.et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, 23Google Scholar
Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102Google Scholar
Greaves, J. S., Fischer, D. A., & Wyatt, M. C. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 283Google Scholar
Høg, E., Fabricius, C., & Makarov, V. V.et al. 2000, A&A, 355, 27Google Scholar
Mizusawa, T. F., Rebull, L. M., & Stauffer, J. R.et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 135Google Scholar
Patel, R. I., Metchev, S. A., & Heinze, A. 2014, ApJS, 786, 10Google Scholar
Patience, J., Akeson, R. L., & Jensen, E. L. N. 2008 ApJ, 677, 616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Zuckerman, B., & McElwain, M. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L, & Stansberry, J. A.et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 1010Google Scholar
Rodriguez, D. R. & Zuckerman, B. 2012, ApJ, 745, 147Google Scholar
Sierchio, J. M., Rieke, G. H., & Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 712, 1421Google Scholar
Trilling, D. E., Stansberry, J. A., & Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1289Google Scholar
Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., & Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868.Google Scholar
Wu, C.-J., Wu, H., & Lam, M.-I.et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339Google Scholar