Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:17:14.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraining planetary interiors with the Love number k2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Ulrike Kramm
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, University of Rostock, D-18051 Rostock, email: ulrike.kramm2@uni-rostock.de
Nadine Nettelmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, University of Rostock, D-18051 Rostock, email: ulrike.kramm2@uni-rostock.de Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Ronald Redmer
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, University of Rostock, D-18051 Rostock, email: ulrike.kramm2@uni-rostock.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the solar sytem giant planets the measurement of the gravitational moments J2 and J4 provided valuable information about the interior structure. However, for extrasolar planets the gravitational moments are not accessible. Nevertheless, an additional constraint for extrasolar planets can be obtained from the tidal Love number k2, which, to first order, is equivalent to J2. k2 quantifies the quadrupolic gravity field deformation at the surface of the planet in response to an external perturbing body and depends solely on the planet's internal density distribution. On the other hand, the inverse deduction of the density distribution of the planet from k2 is non-unique. The Love number k2 is a potentially observable parameter that can be obtained from tidally induced apsidal precession of close-in planets (Ragozzine & Wolf 2009) or from the orbital parameters of specific two-planet systems in apsidal alignment (Mardling 2007). We find that for a given k2, a precise value for the core mass cannot be derived. However, a maximum core mass can be inferred which equals the core mass predicted by homogeneous zero metallicity envelope models. Using the example of the extrasolar transiting planet HAT-P-13b we show to what extend planetary models can be constrained by taking into account the tidal Love number k2.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Bakos, G. A., Howard, A. W., Noyes, R. W., Hartman, J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batygin, K., Bodenheimer, P., & Laughlin, G. 2009, ApJL, 704, L49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramm, U., Nettelmann, N., Redmer, R., & Stevenson, D. J. 2011, A&A, 528, A18Google Scholar
Love, A. E. H. 1911, Some problems of geodynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press)Google Scholar
Mardling, R. A. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettelmann, N., Kramm, U., Redmer, R., & Neuhäuser, R. 2010, A&A, 523, A26Google Scholar
Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011, ApJ, 733, id.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragozzine, D. & Wolf, A. S. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJ, 99, 713Google Scholar
Zharkov, V. N. & Trubitsyn, V. P. 1978, Physics of planetary interiors (Astronomy and Astrophysics Series, Tucson: Pachart, 1978)Google Scholar