Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T15:37:33.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Errors on errors – Estimating cosmological parameter covariance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2015

Benjamin Joachimi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Place, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom email: b.joachimi@ucl.ac.uk
Andy Taylor
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, United Kingdom email: ant@roe.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Current and forthcoming cosmological data analyses share the challenge of huge datasets alongside increasingly tight requirements on the precision and accuracy of extracted cosmological parameters. The community is becoming increasingly aware that these requirements not only apply to the central values of parameters but, equally important, also to the error bars. Due to non-linear effects in the astrophysics, the instrument, and the analysis pipeline, data covariance matrices are usually not well known a priori and need to be estimated from the data itself, or from suites of large simulations. In either case, the finite number of realisations available to determine data covariances introduces significant biases and additional variance in the errors on cosmological parameters in a standard likelihood analysis. Here, we review recent work on quantifying these biases and additional variances and discuss approaches to remedy these effects.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Dodelson, S. & Schneider, M. D. 2013, Phys Rev D, 88, 063537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlap, J., Simon, P., & Schneider, P. 2007, A&A, 464, 399Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. M. 1967, Report No. 6710, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Catholic University of Louvain, Heverlee, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Percival, W., Ross, A. J., Sanchez, A. G., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2531Google Scholar
Pope, A. C. & Szapudi, I. 2008, Tech. Report No. 37, Depart. Statist., Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Stein, C., Efron, B., & Morris, C. 1972, 389, 766Google Scholar
Taylor, A. N. & Joachimi, B. 2014, MNRAS, accepted (TJ14)Google Scholar
Taylor, A. N., Joachimi, B., & Kitching, T. 2013, MNRAS 432 1928 (TJK13)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, J. 1928, Biometrika, 20A, 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar