Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:03:51.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The light elements in a helio- and asteroseismic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2010

Sylvie Vauclair
Sylvie Vauclair*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Astronomie de Toulouse-Tarbes, Université de Toulouse, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France email: sylvie.vauclair@ast.obs-mip.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Asteroseismology is a powerful tool to derive stellar parameters, including the helium content and internal helium gradients, and the macroscopic motions which can lead to lithium, beryllium, and boron abundance variations. Precise determinations of these parameters need deep analyses for each individual stars. After a general introduction on helio and asteroseismology, I first discuss the solar case, the results which have been obtained in the past two decades, and the crisis induced by the new determination of the abundances of heavy elements. Then I discuss asteroseismology in relation with light element abundances, especially for the case of main sequence stars.

Keywords

Sun: abundancesheliosismology – stars: interiors
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S268: Light Elements in the Universe , November 2009 , pp. 387 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Angulo, C., Arnould, M., & Rayet, M., (NACRE collaboration) 1999, Nuclear Physics A, 656, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., & Sauval, J. 2005, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 336, 25Google Scholar
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481Google Scholar
Balachandran, S. & Bell, R.A. 1997, AAS meeting 29, 1325Google Scholar
Basu, S., Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., New, R., & Serenelli, A. M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazot, M., Vauclair, S., Bouchy, F., & Santos, N. C. 2005, A&A, 440, 615Google Scholar
Brun, A. S., Antia, H. M., Chitre, S. M., & Zahn, J.-P. 2002, A&A, 391, 725Google Scholar
Bouchy, F., Bazot, M., Santos, N. C., Vauclair, S., & Sosnowska, D. 2005, A&A, 440, 609Google Scholar
Castro, M. & Vauclair, S. 2006, A&A, 456, 611Google Scholar
Castro, M., Vauclair, S., & Richard, O. 2007, A&A, 463, 755Google Scholar
Charbonnel, C. & Talon, S. 2005, Science, 309, 2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charbonnel, C. & Zahn, J. P. 2007, A&A (Letters), 467, 15Google Scholar
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. et al. 1996, Science, 272, 1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggenberger, P. 2009, this conferenceGoogle Scholar
Geiss, J. & Gloecker, G. 1998, Space Science Reviews, 84, 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, D. O. 1986, in Hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic problems in the Sun and stars, ed. Osaki, Y. (Uni. of Tokyo Press), p. 117Google Scholar
Gough, D. O. 1990, In Progress of Seismology of the Sun and Stars, Proc. Oji International Seminar (Hakone) (Japan: Springer Verlag), Lect. Notes Phys., 367, 283, eds Osaki, Y., Shibahashi, H.Google Scholar
Grevesse, N. & Sauval, A. J. 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houdek, G. & Gough, D.O. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, C. A. & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, D. W. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laymand, M. & Vauclair, S. 2007, A&A, 463, 657Google Scholar
Leibacher, J. W. & Stein, R. F. 1971, APL, 7, 191LGoogle Scholar
Leighton, R. B., Noyes, R. W., & Simon, G. W. 1962, ApJ, 135, 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, O., Vauclair, S., Charbonnel, C., & Dziembowski, W. A. 1996, A&A, 312, 1000Google Scholar
Richer, J., Michaud, G., & Turcotte, S. 2000, ApJ, 529, 338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, F. J. & Nayfonov, A. 2002, ApJ, 576, 1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roxburgh, I. W 2009, A&A, 493, 185Google Scholar
Serenelli, A. M., Basu, S., Ferguson, J. W., & Asplund, M. 2009, ApJ, 705, L123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soriano, M., Vauclair, S., Vauclair, G., & Laymand, M. 2007, A&A, 471, 885Google Scholar
Soriano, M. & Vauclair, S. 2008, A&A 488, 975Google Scholar
Talon, S. & Charbonnel, C. 2008, A&A, 482, 597Google Scholar
Tassoul, M. 1980, ApJS, 43, 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theado, S., Vauclair, S., Alecian, G. & Le Blanc, F. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turck-Chieze, S., Appourchaux, T., Ballot, J., et al. , 2005, ESASP, 588, 193Google Scholar
Turcotte, S., Richer, J., Michaud, G., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2000, A&A, 360, 603Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. K. 1970, ApJ, 162, 993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauclair, G., Vauclair, S., & Pamjatnikh, A. 1974, A&A, 31, 63Google Scholar
Vauclair, S. 2004, ApJ, 605, 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauclair, S. & Théado, S. 2004, A&A, 425, 179Google Scholar
Vauclair, S., Laymand, M., Bouchy, F., Vauclair, G., Hui Bon Hoa, A., Charpinet, S. & Bazot, M. 2008, A&A (Letters), 482, 5Google Scholar