Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:07:04.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low/High Redshift Classification of Emission Line Galaxies in the HETDEX survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2015

Viviana Acquaviva
Affiliation:
Physics Department, New York City College of Technology, Brooklyn, NY 11201 email: vacquaviva@citytech.cuny.edu
Eric Gawiser
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08554
Andrew S. Leung
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08554
Mario R. Martin
Affiliation:
Physics Department, New York City College of Technology, Brooklyn, NY 11201 email: vacquaviva@citytech.cuny.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss different methods to separate high- from low-redshift galaxies based on a combination of spectroscopic and photometric observations. Our baseline scenario is the Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy eXperiment (HETDEX) survey, which will observe several hundred thousand Lyman Alpha Emitting (LAE) galaxies at 1.9 < z < 3.5, and for which the main source of contamination is [OII]-emitting galaxies at z < 0.5. Additional information useful for the separation comes from empirical knowledge of LAE and [OII] luminosity functions and equivalent width distributions as a function of redshift. We consider three separation techniques: a simple cut in equivalent width, a Bayesian separation method, and machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines. These methods can be easily applied to other surveys and used on simulated data in the framework of survey planning.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Adams, J. J., et al.ApJS 192, 5 (2011).Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., et al.ApJ 744, 110 (2012).Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., et al.ApJ 769, 83 (2013).Google Scholar
Gronwall, C., et al.ApJ 667, 79 (2007).Google Scholar
Leung, A. S., et al., in preparation (2014).Google Scholar
Boser, E. B., Guyon, I. B., & Vapnik, V. N., 5th Annual ACM Workshop on COLT, 144 (1992).Google Scholar