Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T12:44:50.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Three-Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Model of Active Region Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2005

S. T. Wu
Affiliation:
Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA email: wus@cspar.uah.edu Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA email: wanga@cspar.uah.edu
A. H. Wang
Affiliation:
Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA email: wus@cspar.uah.edu
D. A. Falconer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA email: David.Falconer@msfc.nasa.gov XD12, NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A three-dimensional, time-dependent, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is constructed for the study of active region (AR) evolution. The new physics included in this model is differential rotation, meridional flow, effective diffusion and cyclonic turbulence effects, which means, that the photospheric shear is automatically generated instead of prescribed as is usually done for modeling. To benchmark this newly developed model, we have used observed active region NOAA/AR-8100 (October 29 - November 3, 1997) to verify the model by computation of the total magnetic flux and magnetic field maps of that active region. Then, we apply this model to compute the non-potentiality magnetic field parameters for possible coronal mass ejection production. These parameters are: (i) magnetic flux content ($\Phi$), (ii) the length of strong shear, strong-field main neutral line, ($L_{ss}$), (iii) the net electric current ($I_N$) and (iv) the flux normalized measure of the field twist ($\alpha$ = $\mu$$\frac{I_N}{\Phi}$). These parameters are compared with the measured values which showed remarkable agreement.To search for other articles by the author(s) go to: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© 2005 International Astronomical Union