Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-2ktwh Total loading time: 0.27 Render date: 2021-04-17T17:41:32.823Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Analysing the Relevance of Serious Game Elements for Effectively Teaching Innovation Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Yiming Ma
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
Flore Vallet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; IRT SystemX, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
François Cluzel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
Bernard Yannou
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
Corresponding

Abstract

Serious games (SGs) as a new educational format have gained interest among many scholars from diverse fields. SGs seem to be useful tools for teaching innovation processes (IP) as they guarantee intrinsic motivation and provide situated learning. So far, there is no guideline on designing IP games and lowering their development time while ensuring their effectiveness. To fill this gap, we should first analyse the existing IP games with evaluation methods and synthesise their commonalities. Numerous methods have been put forward in the literature to assess digital SGs; however, most of the SGs for IP are board games. That is why we explore in this paper the use of Serious Game Design Assessment (SGDA) framework to analyse IP board games. According to the case study on an open innovation board game, we suggest applying this method to examine the a priori relevance of game elements (components that make up a game system). Moreover, we make recommendations to complement the SGDA framework with Game and Learning Mechanics, and real-world information. This contribution should help designers transform traditional educational supports into serious board games for teaching IP.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Alkan, S. and Cagiltay, K. (2007), “Studying computer game learning experience through eye tracking”. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 538542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agustin, R. D., Purwarianti, A., Surendro, K. and Suwardi, I. S. (2015), “Instructional Design in Serious Game for Learning Based on Inquiry and Situated Learning Theory”. Advanced Science Letters, Vol. 21 No. 12, pp. 36673671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R. and De Gloria, A. (2015), “Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis”. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 46, pp. 391411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J. J. and Wits, W. (2014), “An Experience-Based Approach to Teaching Product Design”. In DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations, University of Twente, The Netherlands, 04-05.09. 2014 (pp. 688693).Google Scholar
Bogers, M. and Sproedt, H. (2012), “Playful collaboration (or not): using a game to grasp the social dynamics of open innovation in innovation and business education”. Journal of Teaching in International Business, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boks, C. and McAloone, T. (2009), “The design of Eco Board Games as an umbrella approach to sustainable product design education”. Global Engineering Alliance for Research and Education (GEARE)-A Comprehensive Study & Intern Abroad Program for Engineering Students.Google Scholar
Diaz, V. (2017), “Serious Game & innovation : Trouver les innovations possibles d'un produit en jouant”. Available at: https://www.grenoble-em.com/actualite-serious-game-innovation-trouver-les-innovations-possibles-dun-produit-en-jouant. (Accessed: 21 Nov, 2018)Google Scholar
Emmerich, K. and Bockholt, M. (2016), “Serious games evaluation: processes, models, and concepts”. In Entertainment Computing and Serious Games (pp. 265283). Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharbi, N. (n.d.). “Creativ’, Le jeu des idées neuves”. Available at: https://www.cipe.fr/jeux-et-formations/creativ/#1447438165937-ca8c92d6-d3adf177-6859. (Accessed: 21 Nov, 2018)Google Scholar
Glassman, A. M. and Opengart, R. (2016), “Teaching Innovation and Creativity: Turning Theory into Practice”. Journal of International Business Education, Vol. 11, p. 113.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, C., Croset, M. C., Ney, M., Balacheff, N. and Bosson, J. L. (2010), “Authenticity in learning game: how it is designed and perceived”. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 109122). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Innovation Makers. (n.d.), Available at: https://www.daesign.com/innovation-makers. (Accessed: 21 Nov, 2018)Google Scholar
Jeu, IØ. (2016), Available at: http://jeuio.rhizome.group/about. (Accessed: 15 Mar, 2018)Google Scholar
Kerga, E., Akaberi, A., Tasich, M., Rossi, M. and Terzi, S. (2012), “Lean product development: Serious game and evaluation of the learning outcomes”. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (pp. 590597)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, B. and Samson, D. (2001), “Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach”. International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 377400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marczewski, A. (2017), “52 GAMIFICATION MECHANICS AND ELEMENTS”. Available at: https://www.gamified.uk/user-types/gamification-mechanics-elements/. (Accessed: 30 Apr, 2018)Google Scholar
Mitgutsch, K. and Alvarado, N. (2012), “Purposeful by design? : a serious game design assessment framework”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 121128). ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenda, M. (2003), “In search of the elusive ADDIE model”. Performance improvement, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 3436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossoux, S., Delcamp, A., Poppe, S., Michellier, C., Canters, F. and Kervyn, M. (2016), “Hazagora: will you survive the next disaster?–A serious game to raise awareness about geohazards and disaster risk reduction”. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, M., Rodrigues, L. and González, M. (2018), “Business games and creativity stimulus: the behavior of three different teams in the ideation process”. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, E. (2010), “SCVNGR's Secret Game Mechanics Playdeck”. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2010/08/25/scvngr-game-mechanics/. (Accessed: 30 Apr, 2018)Google Scholar
Tohidi, H. and Jabbari, M. M. (2012). “The important of innovation and its crucial role in growth, survival and success of organisations”. Procedia Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 535538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño-Guzmán, N. and Pomales-García, C. (2014). “How Can a Serious Game Impact Student Motivation and Learning?”. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 514). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers.Google Scholar
Van Oudenhove, S. (2017). “The business innovation game”. Available at: http://www.businessvaluedesign.com/. (Accessed: 21 Nov, 2018)Google Scholar
Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H. and Van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). “A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games”. Journal of educational psychology, Vol. 105 No. 2, p. 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 320 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th July 2019 - 17th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access
Open access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Analysing the Relevance of Serious Game Elements for Effectively Teaching Innovation Processes
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Analysing the Relevance of Serious Game Elements for Effectively Teaching Innovation Processes
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Analysing the Relevance of Serious Game Elements for Effectively Teaching Innovation Processes
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *