Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:17:22.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing Physical-Digital Workspaces to Support Globally Collaborative Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Andrea Tucker*
Affiliation:
Université de Lille;
Thierry Gidel
Affiliation:
Université de Technologie de Compiègne
Cédric Fluckiger
Affiliation:
Université de Lille;
*
Contact: Tucker, Andrea, Université de Lille & Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CIREL-PROFEOR & COSTECH-CRI, France, anitucker62@gmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines some aspects of physical-digital workspaces, focusing on multi-user, multi-touch technologies and how different workspaces impact collaboration. We introduce the concept of globally collaborative work. We chose to use case studies completed by groups of students in an engineering course to test different workspace modalities: the use of a large multi-touch table top in conjunction with a multi-touch board (vertical), the use of tablets with the multi-touch board, and finally the multi-touch board alone. The evaluation criteria are based on modes of interaction which emerge during globally collaborative work sessions: individual work, communication, coordination, cooperation and collaboration. We hypothesized that the workspaces would influence collaborative activity, expecting to see higher rates of collaboration in the table top environment than in the other two modalities studied. However, results showed less co-building and more cooperative work, as students divided their work and later attempted to negotiate a coherent product built on individual contributions. Lastly, we share a few design recommendations based on these results.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Baker, M. (2015), “Collaboration in collaborative learning”, Interaction Studies, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 451473. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bakGoogle Scholar
Baudrit, A., (2007), “Apprentissage coopératif/Apprentissage collaboratif : d'un comparatisme conventionnel à un comparatisme critique.” Sci. Léducation - Pour LÈre Nouv. Vol. 40, pp. 115136. https://doi.org/10.3917/lsdle.401.0115Google Scholar
Bruffee, K. A. (1995), “Sharing Our Toys: Cooperative Learning versus Collaborative Learning”, Change, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1218. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.scd.univ-lille3.fr/stable/40165162Google Scholar
Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A. and Vernier, F. (2012), “How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration?Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 4959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.010Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (1999), “What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp. 119). Elsevier, Oxford. Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190240Google Scholar
Doise, W. and Mugny, G. (1984), The social development of the intellect (1st ed). Pergamon Press, Oxford [Oxfordshire]: New York.Google Scholar
Edmonson, A. (1999), “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 350383. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Edmondson%20Psychological%20safety.pdfGoogle Scholar
Henri, F. (2015), Chapitre 13. Collaboration, communautés et réseaux : partenariats pour l'apprentissage. Presses Universitaires de France. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/apprendre-avec-les-technologies–9782130575306-page-169.htmGoogle Scholar
Homaeian, L., Goyal, N., Wallace, J. and Scott, S. (2018), “Group vs Individual: Impact of TOUCH and TILT Cross-Device Interactions on Mixed-Focus Collaboration”, Presented at the 2018 International Conference on Human Factors on Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173647Google Scholar
Jones, A., Kendira, A., Lenne, D., Gidel, T. and Moulin, C. (2011), “The TATIN-PIC Project, A Multi-modal Collaborative Work Environment for Preliminary Design”, In 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (pp. 154161). Lausanne, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2011.5960069Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1946), Psychological Types or The Psychology of Individuation. (Baynes, G., Trans.). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., LTD, London Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/8/8d/Jung_Gustav_Carl_Psychological_Types_1946.PdfGoogle Scholar
Jung, J. H., Lee, Y. and Karsten, R. (2012), “The Moderating Effect of Extraversion–Introversion Differences on Group Idea Generation Performance”, Small Group Research, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 3049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411422130Google Scholar
Lissermann, R., Huber, J., Schmitz, M., Steimle, J. and Mühlhäuser, M. (2014), Permulin: mixed-focus collaboration on multi-view tabletops (pp. 31913200). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557405Google Scholar
Mercier, E., Higgins, S. and Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2014), “The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom”, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 24, pp. 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881392Google Scholar
Panitz, T. (1999). “Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning”. Retrieved January 26, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448443.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pastré, P. (2004). “13. Les compétences professionnelles et leur développement”, In Falzon, P., Ergonomie (1r ed., p. 213). Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.falzo.2004.01.0213Google Scholar
Rogers, Y. and Lindley, S. (2004), “Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best?Interacting with Computers, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 11331152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.008Google Scholar
Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C. and Ringel Morris, M. (2004), “Exploring the Effects of Group Size and Table Size on Interactions with Tabletop Shared-Display Groupware”, In CSCW ‘04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 284293). Chigago, Illinois. Retrieved from http://cs.stanford.edu/∼merrie/papers/table_size.pdfGoogle Scholar
Samurçay, R. and Rabardel, P. (2004), “Modèles pour l'analyse de l'activité et des compétences, propositions”, In Recherches en didactique professionnelle. Octarès éditions, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Shannon, . (1948), “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379423, 623–656. Retrieved from http://math.harvard.edu/∼ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Soller, A. (2001), “Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System”, International Journal of Artificial Intelligencne in Education, Vol. 12. Retrieved from http://iaied.org/pub/980/file/980_paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. (2006), “Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective”, In Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409426). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from http://gerrystahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tardif, J. and Dubois, B. (2010), Chapitre 8. Construire des dispositifs en vue de l’évaluation du développement des compétences. Comment? De Boeck Supérieur. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=DBU_PAQUA_2010_01_0131Google Scholar
Teasley, S. and Roschelle, J. (1995), “Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge”, In O'Malley, C. (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer-Verlag, New York. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/421e/ae7de485aa33bcbacd7af0ebc0fe4c6f235e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thoring, K., Mueller, R. M., Desmet, P. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2018), DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR CREATIVE SPACES (pp. 19691980). Presented at the 15th International Design Conference. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0233Google Scholar
Tucker, A., Gidel, T. and Villemonteix, F. (2018), “Apprendre à collaborer: l'utilisation des tables tactiles pour les projets pédagogiques” (p. 10). Presented at the CONFERE'18, Budapest, Hungary. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327602118_Apprendre_a_collaborer_l'utilisation_des_tables_tactiles_pour_les_projets_pedagogiquesGoogle Scholar
UTC. (2018). “Research projects”. Retrieved March 15, 2018, from http://www.utc.fr/∼gidelthi/Thierry_GIDEL/Research_projects.htmlGoogle Scholar
Zagermann, J., Pfeil, U., Radle, R., Jetter, H.-C., Klokmose, C. and Reiterer, H. (2016), “When Tablets meet Tabletops: The Effect of Tabletop Size on Around-the-Table Collaboration with Personal Tablets”, In CHI’16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 54705481). San Jose, California, USA. Retrieved from http://hci.uni-konstanz.de/downloads/2016_CHI_zagermann.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zumbach, J., Schönemann, J. and Reimann, P. (2005), “Analyzing and supporting collaboration in cooperative computer-mediated communication (pp. 758767). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/1149293.1149393Google Scholar