Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Empirical Study of Good, Bad and Ugly Modular Engineering Solutions in Machinery Manufacturing Industry

  • Tero Juuti, Jarkko Pakkanen and Timo Lehtonen

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the product structuring principles chosen in modular product families and the business results of companies. In the three case studies of the article, it can be seen that products that meet the modularity definitions discussed in the literature have been able to utilise the benefits of modularity in a very varied way. In one business case, the effect of modularity on business has been negative. In two other cases, the effect has been positive - in one of these even the profitability of the business has significantly improved. The aim of this article is to identify whether product designing consistently has been following some product structuring principles previously mentioned in modularisation literature or whether case studies bring new principles to consciousness. In all case studies, the product structuring principles used are also discussed in the previous modularisation studies at a varying extent. In the discussion section, we raise the question of whether the recording and use of product structuring principles in design briefs could lead to making the product design decisions that affect the business positively.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Empirical Study of Good, Bad and Ugly Modular Engineering Solutions in Machinery Manufacturing Industry
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Empirical Study of Good, Bad and Ugly Modular Engineering Solutions in Machinery Manufacturing Industry
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Empirical Study of Good, Bad and Ugly Modular Engineering Solutions in Machinery Manufacturing Industry
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Pakkanen, Jarkko Tapani, Tampere University of Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Systems Finland, jarkko.pakkanen@tut.fi

References

Hide All
Andreasen, M.M. (2011), “45 Years with design methodology”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 293332.
Borjesson, F. (2010), “A systematic qualitative comparison of five approaches to modularity”, DESIGN 2010 - 11th International Design Conference, p. 147.
Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A. and Lindemann, U. (2007), Cost-Efficient Design, edited by Hundal, M.S., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, available at: https://doi/org/10.1007/978-3-540-34648-7.
Erixon, G. (1998), Modular Function Deployment - A Method for Product Modularisation, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fellini, R., Kokkolaras, M. and Papalambros, P.Y. (2006), “Commonality Decisions in Product Family Design”, In: Simpson, T.W., Siddique, Z. and Jiao, J.R. (Eds.), Product Platform and Product Family Design, Springer, pp. 158185.
Förg, A., Stocker, J., Kreimeyer, M. and Lienkamp, M. (2014), “Enabling modularisation potentials by standardized vehicle layouts”, In: Laakso, M. and Ekman, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of NordDesign 2014, The Design Society, Espoo, Finland, pp. 754764.
Fujimoto, T. (2007), Competing to Be Really, Really Good – The behind-the-Scenes Drama of Capability Building Competition in the Automobile Industry, International House of Japan, Tokyo.
Holmqvist, T. (2004), Managing Product Variety through Product Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology.
Huang, G.Q. (Ed.). (1996), Design for X - Concurrent Engineering Imperatives, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, available at: https://doi/org/10.1007/978-94-011-3985-4.
Järvenpää, E., Hylli, O., Siltala, N. and Lanz, M. (2018), “Utilizing SPIN rules to infer the parameters for combined capabilities of aggregated manufacturing resources”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 51 No. 11, pp. 8489.
Krause, D. and Ripperda, S. (2013), “An assessment of methodological approaches to support the development of modular product families”, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED13, Aug 19-22, Sungkyunkwan University, Seol, Korea.
Lehtonen, T. (2007), Designing Modular Product Architecture in the New Product Development, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere.
Lehtonen, T., Juuti, T., Mela, J. and Riitahuhta, A. (2009), “On the development of product family architectures; Comparison of business-oriented and function-based product structuring”, In: Bergendahl, Norell, Grimheden, M., Leifer, M., Skogstad, L., , P. and Lindemann, U. (Eds.), DS 58-2: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 2, Design Theory and Research Methodology, Design Society, Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp. 167178.
Lindh, B.-E. (1992), Scania and Its Vehicles, 1891-1991, Streiffert.
MacGregor. (2012), “Keeping research behind closed doors can be counter-productive”, MacGregor News, No. 164, pp. 1819.
Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P. (1997), The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadershop, The Free Press, New York.
Okudan Kremer, G.E. and Gupta, S. (2013), “Analysis of modularity implementation methods from an assembly and variety viewpoints”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 66 No. 9–12, pp. 19591976.
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (2013), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Vol. 11, Springer Science & Business Media.
Pakkanen, J., Juuti, T. and Lehtonen, T. (2016), “Brownfield process: A method for modular product family development aiming for product configuration”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 45, pp. 210241.
Pakkanen, J., Juuti, T. and Lehtonen, T. (2019), “Identifying and addressing challenges in the engineering design of modular systems – case studies in the manufacturing industry”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 3261.
Pentikäinen, P.P. (2006), Iso Vaalee (in Finnish), Petrin viestintä.
Salvador, F. (2007), “Toward a product system modularity construct: Literature review and reconceptualization”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 219240.
Siltala, N., Järvenpää, E. and Lanz, M. (2016), “Formal Information Model for Representing Production Resources”, In: Nääs, I., Vendrametto, O., Mendes Reis, J., Gonçalves, R.F., Silva, M.T., von Cieminski, G. and Kiritsis, D. (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. Initiatives for a Sustainable World, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 5360.
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2008), Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
United States Department of Defense. (1995), “MIL-STD-1913”.
USB Implementers Forum. (n.d.). “USB”, available at: https://www.usb.org/.
Winterkorn, M. and Pötsch, H.D. (2012), “Volkswagen Golf VII: Launch of a new era”, Sardinia.

Empirical Study of Good, Bad and Ugly Modular Engineering Solutions in Machinery Manufacturing Industry

  • Tero Juuti, Jarkko Pakkanen and Timo Lehtonen

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.