Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T03:57:15.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MBSE-integrated Parametric Working Surfaces as part of a PLM Design Approach

Part of: Systems Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Tim Katzwinkel  and
Manuel Löwer

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper demonstrates a concept for a cross-domain strategy for the sustainable processing and dissemination of product information. Important functional product features are explicitly mapped as working surface information in different domain tools with the help of the contact channel method and are integrated using a model-based systems development approach. The approach uses established state of the art design tools and can be integrated into existing product development processes, knowledge based engineering concepts and product (system) lifecycle management strategies.

Keywords

Product modelling / modelsProduct Lifecycle Management (PLM)Systems Engineering (SE)MBSE

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3671 - 3680
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ashby, M.F. (2005), Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Third edition, Elsevier, Burlington. ISBN: 0-7506-6168-2.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer, London. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1Google Scholar
Blumör, A., Pregitzer, G. and Bothen, M. (2017), “Werkzeuge für die Entwicklung mechatronischer Systeme mit Methoden des MBSE”, In: Schulze, S.-O., Tschirner, C., Kaffenberger, R. and Ackva, S. (Ed.), Tag des Systems Engineering 2017, Carl Hanser, Munich, pp. 193–202. Paderborn, 8.-10. November.Google Scholar
CADENAS (2018), Strategic Parts Management Plattform PARTSolutions [online] CADENAS GmbH. Available at: https://partsolutions.com/partsolutions/ (06.03.2018)Google Scholar
Ersoy, M. (1975), Wirkfläche und Wirkraum. Ausgangselemente zum Ermitteln der Gestalt beim rechnerunterstützten Konstruieren, PhD Thesis, Department of mechanical and electrical engineering, TU Braunschweig University.Google Scholar
Friedenthal, S., Moore, A. and Steiner, R. (2012), A Practical Guide to SysML, The Systems Modeling Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam. ISBN: 978-0-12-385206-9Google Scholar
Xue, J. (2018), Integration of CAD/CAPP/CAM., De Gruiter, Bejing. ISBN: 978-3-11-057308-4 10.1515/9783110573091Google Scholar
Koller, R. and Kastrup, N. (1994), Prinziplösungen zur Konstruktion technischer Produkte, Mit 300 Abbildungen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58755-9Google Scholar
Katzwinkel, T., Jacobs, G., Löwer, M., Schmid, A. and Schmidt, W. (2017), “Functional surfaces as initial product design concept in 3d-CAD-systems”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vancouver, Canada, 21.-25. August, The Design Society, Vancouver, (Design Information and Knowledge, 6) pp. 197–206.Google Scholar
Lamm, J.G. and Weilkiens, T. (2010), “Functional Architectures in SysML”, In: Maurer, M. and Schulze, S.-O. (Ed.), Tag des Systems Engineerings 2010, Munich, Germany, 10.-12. November, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich, pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
OOSE Innovative Informatik eG, em engineering AG, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Hermut-Schmidt-Universität Hamburg (2016), Mechanics Modeling Language (MechML), Version 1.0. Available at: http://fasform.de/content/?ddownload=1431 (19.03.2019).Google Scholar
OMG (2017): OMG Systems Modeling Language™ Version 1.5. [online] The Object Management Group. Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.5/PDF (16.01.2018).Google Scholar
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (2007), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2Google Scholar
Siemens, PLM (2018), HD3D Visual Reporting Fact Sheet [online] Siemens Industry Software. Available at: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/Images/20674_tcm1023-94539.pdf (06.03.2018)Google Scholar
TraceParts (2018), TraceParts DVD, [online] TraceParts GmbH. Available at: https://info.traceparts.com/de/nutzen-und-verwalten-sie-3d-cad-modelle/traceparts-dvd/ubersicht/ (06.03.2018)Google Scholar
Ugarte, D. and Izaguirre, A. (2013), “Multistate Feature Modelling of a Very Complex Design Feature”, Smart Product Engineering: Proceedings of the 23rd CIRP Design Conference, Bochum, Germany, March 11th - 13th, 2013, Springer, pp. 451–461.10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_44Google Scholar
VDI 2219 (2016), Information technology in product development, Intoduction and usage of PDM systems, Verein deutscher Ingenieure e.V., Beuth Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf. ICS 03.100.40; 35.240.10.Google Scholar