Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T12:00:34.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potentials for the Integration of Design Thinking along Automotive Systems Engineering Focusing Security and Safety

Part of: Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Julian Tekaat ,
Aschot Kharatyan ,
Harald Anacker  and
Roman Dumitrescu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The increasingly intelligent, highly complex, technical systems of tomorrow - for instance autonomous vehicles - result in the necessity for a systematic security- and safety-oriented development process that starts in the early phases of system design. Automotive Systems Engineering (ASE) as one approach is increasingly gaining ground in the automotive industry. However, this approach is still in a prototype stage. The consideration of security and safety within the early stages of systems design leads to so- called ill-defined problems. Such are not covered by ASE, but can be addressed by means of Design Thinking. Therefore we introduce an approach to combine both approaches. Based on this combination, we derive potentials in the context of the consideration of security and safety. Essential advantages are the possibility to think ahead of threat scenarios at an early stage in system design. Due to an incomplete database, this is not supported or only partially supported by conventional approaches. The resulting potentials are derived based upon a practical example.

Keywords

Systems Engineering (SE)New product developmentEarly design phasesSecurity & SafetyDesign Thinking

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2883 - 2892
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bakirtzis, G., Simon, B.J., Fleming, C.H. and Elks, C.R. (2018), Looking for a Black Cat in a Dark Room: Security Visualization for Cyber-Physical System Design and Analysis, available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.08081v2.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, London.Google Scholar
Brenner, W. and Uebernickel, F. (Eds.) (2016), Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice, 1st ed. 2016, Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google Scholar
Checkoway, S., McCoy, D., Kantor, B., Anderson, D., Shacham, H., Savage, S., Koscher, K., Czeskis, A., Roesner, F., Kohno, T. and others (2011), “Comprehensive experimental analyses of automotive attack surfaces”.Google Scholar
Conway, R., Masters, J. and Thorold, J. (2017), “From Design Thinking to Systems Change”, Royal Society of Arts (London, UK).Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Rammig, F.J. and Schäfer, W. (Eds.) (2014), Design Methodology for Intelligent Technical Systems: Develop Intelligent Technical Systems of the Future, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) (2015), Automation: From Driver Assistance Systems to Automated Driving, Magazine - Automation, Berlin.Google Scholar
ISO 26262 (2011), Road vehicles: Functional safety, ICS 01.040.43; 43.040.10 No. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Israilidis, J., Lock, R. and Cooke, L. (2013), “Ignorance Management”, Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
Koscher, K., Czeskis, A., Roesner, F., Patel, S., Kohno, T., Checkoway, S., McCoy, D., Kantor, B., Anderson, D., Shacham, H. and Savage, S. (2010), “Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile”, in IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 2010: 16 - 19 May 2010, Berkeley/Oakland, California, Oakland, CA, USA, 5/16/2010 - 5/19/2010, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 447–462.Google Scholar
Lewrick, M., Patrick, L. and Leifer, L. (2018), The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams, Products, Services, Businesses and Ecosystems, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Lukei, M., Hassan, B., Dumitrescu, R., Sigges, T. and Derksen, V. (2016), “Requirement analysis of inspection equipment for integrative mechatronic product and production system development: Model-based systems engineering approach”, in 10th Annual International Systems Conference proceedings, April 18-21, 2016, Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress, Orlando, Florida, USA, Orlando, FL, USA, 4/18/2016 - 4/21/2016, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Macher, G., Sporer, H., Berlach, R., Armengaud, E. and Kreiner, C. (2015), “SAHARA: A security-aware hazard and risk analysis method”.Google Scholar
Maurer, M. and Winner, H. (2013), Automotive Systems Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Miller, C. and Valasek, C. (2013), “Adventures in automotive networks and control units”, Def Con, Vol. 21, pp. 260–264.Google Scholar
Miller, C. and Valasek, C. (2015), “Remote Exploitation of an Unaltered Passenger Vehicle”, available at: http://www.ioactive.com/labs/resources-white-papers.html5 (accessed 7 March 2019).Google Scholar
Nourian, A. and Madnick, S. (2018), “A Systems Theoretic Approach to the Security Threats in Cyber Physical Systems Applied to Stuxnet”, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar
Plattner, H., Meinel, C. and Leifer, L. (Eds.) (2016), Design thinking research: Making design thinking foundational, Understanding innovation, Springer, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar
Strafaci, A. (2008), “What does BIM mean for civil engineers”, CE News, Tranportation, No. 127.Google Scholar
Tomita, Y., Watanabe, K., Shirasaka, S. and Maeno, T. (2017), “Applying design thinking in systems engineering process as an extended version of DIKW model”.Google Scholar
VDI 2206 (2004), Design methodology for mechatronic systems, Vol. 03.100.40; 31.220, Beuth Verlag, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D. and Shortell, T. M. (Eds.) (2015), Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities ; INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04, 2015, 4. edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Winner, H. (2013), “Challenges of automotive systems engineering for industry and academia”, in Automotive Systems Engineering, Springer, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-Y. (2015), “Towards innovative system development: A joint method of design thinking and systems thinking”.Google Scholar