Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:15:10.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Process and Operations of Shape Generation and Manipulation during the Architectural Designing Activity

Part of: Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Walid Bouhelis  and
Abdelmalek Arrouf

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This piece of work is concerned with how shapes are generated, explored and transformed during the architectural designing process. It postulates that the relations and connections between sketches, produced during the design activity, can be defined in terms of shape transformations and described according to a closed list of shape operators. These latters provide a formal description of the shape exploration process and allow a deep understanding of its logic. To achieve its goal, this study creates a model to describe the different shape transformations, performed by designers, during the sketching activity.

Keywords

Early design phasesShape operatorsDesign processProtocol analysisDesign cognition
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1683 - 1692
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Arrouf, A. and Bensaci, A: (2006), Modélisation du processus de conception, Étude expérimentale du système compositionnel, instance conception, in Courrier du savoir, Vol. 7, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Arrouf, A. (2012), “Vers une théorie scientifique de la conception architecturale, contribution à l’épistémologie architecturale et à la modélisation de l'acte de concevoir”, Editions Universitaires Européennes, Searbrucken, Germany.Google Scholar
Borie, A., Micheloni, P. and Pinon, P. (2006), Forme et déformation des objets architecturaux et urbains, Editions Parenthèses, Paris.Google Scholar
Ching, F.D.K. (2007), Architecture : Form, Space & Order, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
De Biasi, P-M. (2000), pour une approche génétique de l'architecture, in Genesis, n°14/2000, Centre canadien d'architecture et Jean Michel Place, Paris, pp. 13–66.Google Scholar
Do, E.Y., Gross, M.D., Neiman, B. and Zimring, C. (2000), Intentions in and relations among design drawings, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00020-xGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, M. (1998), The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study, http://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(88)90034-8Google Scholar
Göel, V. (1995), Sketches of Thought, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jowers, I., Hogg, D. C., McKay, A., Chau, H. H. and De Pennington, A. (2010), Shape detection with vision: implementing shape grammars in conceptual design, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0088-zGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H. And Yen, C-C. (2009), Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review.Google Scholar
Lim, S., Prats, M., Jowers, I., Chase, S., Garner, S. W. and McKay, A. (2008), Shape Exploration in Design: Formalising and supporting a transformational Process. http://doi.org/10.1260/147807708787523303Google Scholar
Prats, M., Lim, S. and Jowers, I. (2008), “Describing shape transformations in design sketches”, Design Computing and Cognition DCC'08 workshop on Informing computational support for conceptual design: lessons learned from sketching studies, 21 June 2008, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
Prats, M; Lim, S.; Jowers, I.; Garner, S. W. and Chase, S. (2009), Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.002Google Scholar
Rodgers, P. A.; Green, G. and McGowan, A. (2000), Using concept sketches to track design progress. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00018-1Google Scholar
Suwa, M.; Purcell, T. A. and Gero, J. S. (1998), Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00016-7Google Scholar
Suwa, M.; Gero, J. S. and Purcell, T. A. (2006), The role of sketches in early conceptual design processes.Google Scholar
Terzidis, C. (1989), Transformational design.Google Scholar
Trescak, T., Esteva, M. and Rodriguez, I. (2012), A shape grammar interpreter for rectilinear forms. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.02.009Google Scholar
Wetzel, J. P. (2009), Proposition d'opérateurs morphosémantiques paramétriques d'assistance à la conception de formes architecturales, Phd. Thesis, École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Nancy.Google Scholar
Wetzel, J. P., Bignon, J-C and Belblidia, S. (2006), “Use of morphological operators to assist architectural design in early stage”. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5060-2_26Google Scholar
Yang, S. C. (2002), Reconceptualising think-aloud methodology: refining the encoding and categorizing techniques via contextualized perspectives. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00011-0Google Scholar