Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Supporting Early Stage Set-Based Concurrent Engineering with Value Driven Design

  • Alessandro Bertoni (a1) and Marco Bertoni (a1)

Abstract

Set-Based Concurrent Engineering is commonly adopted to drive the development of complex products and systems. However, its application requires design information about a future product that is often not mature enough in the early design stages, and that it is not encompassing a service and lifecycle- oriented perspective. There is a need for manufacturers to understand, since the early design stages, how customer value is created along the lifecycle of a product from a hardware and service perspective, and how to use such information to screen radically new technologies, trade-off promising design configurations and commit to a design concept. The paper presents an approach for the multidisciplinary value assessment of design concepts in sub-systems design, encompassing the high-level concept screening and the trade-off of different design concepts, and enabling the integration of value models results into a Set-based Concurrent Engineering process. The approach is described through its application in the case study of the development of a subsystem component for a commercial aircraft engine.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Supporting Early Stage Set-Based Concurrent Engineering with Value Driven Design
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Supporting Early Stage Set-Based Concurrent Engineering with Value Driven Design
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Supporting Early Stage Set-Based Concurrent Engineering with Value Driven Design
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Bertoni, Alessandro, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Sweden, alessandro.bertoni@bth.se

References

Hide All
Bertoni, A., Bertoni, M. and Isaksson, O. (2013), “Value visualization in Product Service Systems preliminary design”, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 53, pp. 103117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.012
Bertoni, A., Levandowski, C., Isaksson, O. and Larsson, T. (2016), “Virtual Modeling for Lifecycle Performance Assessment in aerospace design”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 47, pp. 335340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.219
Bertoni, M., Bertoni, A. and Isaksson, O. (2018), “Evoke: A value-driven concept selection method for early system design”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 4677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-016-5324-2
Bertoni, M., Wall, J. and Bertoni, A. (2018b), “Model Driven Decision Arena: an aerospace study”, In International Design Conference, Dubrovnik (pp. 171182). The Design Society. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0326
Blessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer Science and Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1_2
Canbaz, B., Yannou, B. and Yvars, P.A. (2014), “Improving process performance of distributed set-based design systems by controlling wellbeing indicators of design actors”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 136 No. 2, p. 021005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026034
Carlile, P.R. (2002), “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development”, Organization Science 2002, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 442455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
Castagne, S., Curran, R. and Collopy, P. (2009), “Implementation of value-driven optimisation for the design of aircraft fuselage panels”, International journal of production economics, Vol. 117 No. 2, pp. 381388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.005
Cheung, J., Scanlan, J., Wong, J., Forrester, J., Eres, H., Collopy, P., Hollingsworth, P., Wiseall, S. and Briceno, S. (2012), “Application of value-driven design to commercial aeroengine systems”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 688702. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031319
Collopy, P.D. and Hollingsworth, P.M. (2011), “Value-driven design”, Journal of aircraft, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 749759. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C000311
Eres, H., Bertoni, M. and Scanlan, J. (2014), “Mapping customer needs to engineering characteristics: an aerospace perspective for conceptual design”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 25 No. 1-3, pp. 6487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2014.903387
European Commission (2006), EC No 1907/2006. [online] available at https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/legislation_en accessed on March 19th, 2019.
Fine, C.H., Vardan, R., Pethick, R. and El-Hout, J. (2002), “Rapid-Response Capability In Value-Chain Design”, MIT Sloan Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1.1.127.1479
Inoue, M., Nahm, Y.E., Okawa, S. and Ishikawa, H. (2010), “Design support system by combination of 3D-CAD and CAE with preference set-based design method”, Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 4153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X09360833
Isaksson, O., Bertoni, A., Levandowski, C., Müller, J., Wiklund, D. and Johansson, P.B.V. (2016), “Virtual contextual validation of technologies and methods for product development”, In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference (pp. 669678).
Isaksson, O., Kossmann, M., Bertoni, M., Eres, H., Monceaux, A., Bertoni, A., Wiseall, S. and Zhang, X. (2013, June), “Value-Driven Design–A methodology to Link Expectations to Technical Requirements in the Extended Enterprise”, In INCOSE International Symposium (Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 803819). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2013.tb03055.x
Johannesson, H., Landahl, J., Levandowski, C. and Raudberget, D. (2017), “Development of product platforms: Theory and methodology”, Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 195211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X17709866
Kim, G., Park, C.S. and Yoon, K.P. (1997), “Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00014-5
Levandowski, C., Michaelis, M.T. and Johannesson, H. (2014), “Set-based development using an integrated product and manufacturing system platform”, Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 234252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X14537654
Malak, R. J. Jr, Aughenbaugh, J.M. and Paredis, C.J. (2009), “Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 214227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.004
McManus, H.M., Richards, M.G., Ross, A.M. and Hastings, D.E. (2007), “A Framework for Incorporating “ilities” in Tradespace Studies”, AIAA Space 2007, Long Beach, CA, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-6100
Miles, L.D. (1962), Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Monceaux, A., Kossmann, M., Wiseall, S., Bertoni, M., Isaksson, O., Eres, H., Bertoni, A. and Rianantsoa, N. (2014), “Overview of Value-Driven Design Research: Methods, Applications, and Relevance for Conceptual Design”, Insight, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 3739.
Normann, R. and Ramirez, R. (1993), “From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy”, Harvard business review, Vol. 71 No. 4, pp. 6577.
Panarotto, M. (2015), A Model-Based Methodology for Value Assessment in Conceptual Design (Doctoral dissertation, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola). ISBN: 978-91-7295-316-1
Park, R. (2017), Value engineering: a plan for invention, Routledge. ISBN: 1-57444-235-X
Qureshi, A.J., Dantan, J.-Y., Bruyere, J. and Bigot, R. (2010), “Set based robust design of mechanical systems using the quantifier constraint satisfaction algorithm”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 11731186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.02.003
Ross, A.M., Hastings, D.E., Warmkessel, J.M. and Diller, N.P. (2004), “Multi-attribute tradespace exploration as front end for effective space system design”, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 2028. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9204
Ross, A.M., Rhodes, D.H. and Hastings, D.E. (2008), “Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 246262. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20098
Shapiro, B.P. and Jackson, B.B. (1978), “Industrial pricing to meet customer needs”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 119127.
Shih, H.S., Shyur, H.J. and Lee, E.S. (2007), “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 45 No. 7, pp. 801813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
Sobek, D.K. II, Ward, A.C. and Liker, J.K. (1999), “Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 2, p. 67.
Steiner, F. and Harmon, R. (2009), “The Impact of Intangible Value on the Design and Marketing of New Products and Services: An Exploratory Approach”, Proceedings of PICMET 2009. Portland, Oregon USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261890
Whyte, W.F. (1991), “Participatory action research: Through practice to science in social research”, Participatory action research, pp. 1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428903200500

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed