Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Testing the Robustness of Circularity Indicators: Empirical Insights from Workshops on an Industrial Product

  • Michael Saidani (a1), François Cluzel (a1), Yann Leroy (a1) and Bernard Yannou (a1)

Abstract

Monitoring properly the circularity performance of technical products is a point of increasing importance. Yet, evaluating the circularity potential of products during (re)design and development phases is a challenging task. In this study, several C-indicators are experienced by doctoral students and industrialists through two workshops on a real-world industrial product. The values obtained for each indicator are collected and analyzed: as all participant are working on the same technical product with the same dataset, the circularity scores calculated are compared to discuss the reliability and the uncertainty related to these indicators. These new empirical insights are put in parallel with the existing critical analyses of C-indicators from literature. As a result, future research directions on circularity indicators are advanced and discussed, including: the integration of uncertainty considerations into the assessment methodology of circularity indicators; the uptake by industry of such indicators during product design and development; the link between circularity and sustainability scores.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Testing the Robustness of Circularity Indicators: Empirical Insights from Workshops on an Industrial Product
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Testing the Robustness of Circularity Indicators: Empirical Insights from Workshops on an Industrial Product
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Testing the Robustness of Circularity Indicators: Empirical Insights from Workshops on an Industrial Product
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Saidani, Michael, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay Laboratoire Génie Industriel, France, michael.saidani@centralesupelec.fr

References

Hide All
Blessing, L. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer-Verlag London Limited.
Bonet, D., Petit, I. and Lancini, A. (2014), “L’économie circulaire : quelles mesures de la performance économique, environnementale et sociale?”, Revue française de gestion industrielle, Vol. 33 No. 4.
Cayzer, S., Griffiths, P. and Beghetto, V. (2017), “Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 10, pp. 289298.
Earley, R. (2017), “Circular Design Futures”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 421434.
EASAC-European Academies Science Advisory Council (2016), Indicators for a Circular Economy, EASAC Policy Report No. 30, Halle, Germany.
EEA-European Environment Agency (2016), Circular economy in Europe – Developing the knowledge base, EEA Report No. 2/2016.
EMF-Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015), Circularity Indicators – An Approach to Measure Circularity. Methodology & Project Overview, Cowes, UK.
Evans, J. and Bocken, N. (2013), The Circular Economy Toolkit. Available online: http://circulareconomytoolkit.org (accessed 1 November 2018).
Eyckmans, J., García-Barragán, J.-F. and Rousseau, S. (2018), “Defining and measuring the circular economy: A mathematical approach”, IECOMAT (Integrated economic modeling of material flows) Project, Pre-print, March 2018.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. and Hultink, E. (2017), “The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 143, pp. 757768.
Griffiths, P. and Cayzer, S. (2016), “Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy”, International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (SDM 2016), pp. 307321.
Leroy, Y., Tyl, B., Vallet, F. and Cluzel, F. (2015), “Environmental evaluation of ideas in early phases: a challenging issue for design teams”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, Jul. 2015.
Linder, M., Sarasini, S. and van Loon, P. (2017), “A Metric for Quantifying Product-Level Circularity”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 21, pp. 545558.
OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (November 2014), Measuring and managing results in development co-operation, Report.
Parchomenko, A., Nelen, D., Gillabel, J. and Rechberger, H. (2019), “Measuring the circular economy - A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 210, pp. 200216.
Saidani, M. (2018), Monitoring and advancing the circular economy transition – Circularity indicators and tools applied to the heavy vehicle industry, PhD Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay.
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y. and Cluzel, F. (2017a), “Hybrid top-down and bottom-up framework to measure products’ circularity performance”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vancouver, Canada, Aug. 2017.
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y. and Cluzel, F. (2017b), “How to Assess Product Performance in the Circular Economy? Proposed Requirements for the Design of a Circularity Measurement Framework”, Recycling, Vol. 2 No. 6.
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F. and Kendall, A. (2019), “A taxonomy of circular economy indicators”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 207, pp. 542559.
Walker, S., Coleman, N., Hodgson, P., Collins, N. and Brimacombe, L. (2018), “Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 666680.

Keywords

Testing the Robustness of Circularity Indicators: Empirical Insights from Workshops on an Industrial Product

  • Michael Saidani (a1), François Cluzel (a1), Yann Leroy (a1) and Bernard Yannou (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed