Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:30:46.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Personas in the Design Process. Towards the Development of Green Product Personality for In-Car User Interfaces

Part of: Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Franka Wehr  and
Martin Luccarelli

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The desire to combine advanced user-friendly interfaces with a product personality communicating environmental friendliness to customers poses new challenges for car interior designers, as little research has been carried out in this field to date. In this paper, the creation of three personas aimed at defining key German car users with pro-environmental behaviour is presented. After collecting ethnographic data of potential drivers through literature review, information about generation and Euro car segment led to the definition of three key user groups. The resulting personas were applied to determine the most important interaction points in car interior. Finally, present design cues of eco-friendly product personality developed in the field of automotive design were explored. Our work presents three strategic directions for the design development of future in-car user interfaces named as a) foster multimodal mobility; b) emphasize the interlinkage economy - sustainable driving; and c) highlight new technological developments. The presented results are meant as an impulse for developers to fit the needs of green customers and drivers when designing user-friendly HMI components.

Keywords

HMIUser centred designSustainabilityIndustrial designGreen design cues
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2911 - 2920
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Adam, N. (2016), “Key Success Factors for Automotive Premium Brands in Answer to the Change of Luxury and Societal Changes”, in International Marketing Trends Conference Proceedings, Venice.Google Scholar
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Verbrauchs- und Medienanalyse (2017), VuMA Touchpoints 2017. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Verbrauchs- und Medienanalyse (Ed.), Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Ashby, M.F. and Johnson, K. (2002), Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
BMW, DLR, DB Rent, Landeshauptstadt München, Universität der Bundeswehr München and Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt Berlin (2016), Wirkung von E-Car Sharing Systemen auf Mobilität und Umwelt in urbanen Räumen (WiMobil), available at: https://www.erneuerbar-mobil.de/sites/default/files/2016-10/Abschlussbericht_WiMobil.pdf (accessed 6 December 2018).Google Scholar
Bogenberger, K., Müller, J., Weikl, S. and Schmöller, S. (2016), “Entwicklung und Nutzungsstruktur von Carsharing-Systemen in Deutschland”, in Wappelhorst, S., Jacoby, C. and Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung -Leibniz-Forum für Raumwissenschaften (Eds.), Potenziale neuer Mobilitätsformen und -technologien für eine nachhaltige Raumentwicklung., Verl. d. ARL, Hannover.Google Scholar
Bolton, R.N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Komarova Loureiro, Y. and Solnet, D. (2013), “Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 245–267. http://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326987.Google Scholar
Bundesverband CarSharing (2018), Aktuelle Zahlen und Daten zum CarSharing in Deutschland. Bundesverband CarSharing (Ed.), available at: https://carsharing.de/alles-ueber-carsharing/carsharing-zahlen/aktuelle-zahlen-daten-zum-carsharing-deutschland (accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Chatterjee, K., Goodwin, P., Schwanen, T., Clark, B., Jain, J., Malia, S., Middleton, J., Plyushteva, A., Ricci, M. and Santos, G. and Stokes, G. (2018), Young People's Travel – What's Changed and Why? Review and Analysis: Report to Department for Transport, UWE Bristol (Ed.), Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Choo, S. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2004), “What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 201–222. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.10.005.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1999), Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 Merger Procedure, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg (Ed.), Brussel, Belgium.Google Scholar
Ford (2016), Ford-Studie erklärt anhaltende Beliebtheit von SUVs, Ford (Ed.), available at: https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/feu/de/de/news/2016/05/12/ford-studie-erklaert-anhaltende-beliebtheit-von-suvs.html (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Govers, P.C.M. (2004), “Product Personality”, Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 15 June.Google Scholar
Govers, P.C.M. and Schoormans, J.P. (2005), “Product personality and its influence on consumer preference”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 189–197.Google Scholar
He, H.A., Greenberg, S. and Huang, E.M. (2010), “One size does not fit all: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design”, in Mynatt, E., Schoner, D., Fitzpatrick, G., Hudson, S., Edwards, K. and Rodden, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp. 927–936. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753464.Google Scholar
Hekkert, P. and Dijk, M. (2001), “Designing from context: Foundations and applications if the ViP approach”, in Loyd, P. and Christiaans, H. (Eds.), Designing in Context: Proceedings of DTRS 5, Delft University Press.Google Scholar
Hetterich, J., Bonnemeier, S., Pritzke, M. and Georgiadis, A. (2012), “Ecological sustainability – a customer requirement? Evidence from the automotive industry”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 55 No. 9, pp. 1111–1133. http://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.636578.Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation Europe (2017), European Vehicle Market Statistics 2017/2018, Mock, P. (Ed.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Kambeck, R., Kasten, T. and Siemers, L.-H.R. (2009), Zur Einkommenssituation der privaten Haushalte in Deutschland: Endbericht, Projekt im Auftrag von AWD, Hannover. Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Essen (Ed.), Essen.Google Scholar
Karjalainen, T.M. (2003), “Strategic brand identity and symbolic design cues”, in 6th Asian Design Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Kopp, J.P. (2015), “GPS-gestützte Evaluation des Mobilitätsverhaltens von free-floating CarSharing-Nutzern”, Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, p. 2015.Google Scholar
Köster, U. and Pütz, E. (2018), Zahlen and Fakten 2017: Ausgabe 2018, Wirtschaftsgesellschaft des Kraftfahrzeuggewerbes mbH (Ed.), Bonn.Google Scholar
Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Wirtz, M. and Kalinowska, D. (2012), “Travel trends among young adults in Germany: increasing multimodality and declining car use for men”, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, pp. 443–450. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.018.Google Scholar
Landau, M., Koerber, M. and Loehmann, S. (2013), “Towards a Multisensory Representation of Electromobility Characteristics”, in Terken, J., Riener, A., Schroeter, R. and Osswald, S. (Eds.), Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Adjuct Proceedings, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Jung, B. and Chu, W. (2015), “Signaling Environmental Altruism through Design: The Role of Green Cue Prominence in Hybrid Cars”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
Loose, W. (2010), Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa, Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket, momo Carsharing-More options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing, Bundesverband CarSharing e. V. (Ed.), Freiburg.Google Scholar
Luccarelli, M. (2017), “Material Perception in Alternative Fuel Car Interiors. Increasing Marketability through Green Design Cues”, in Proceedings of the 30th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, EVS30, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, M. (2015), Von Babyboomer bis Generation Z: Der richtige Umgang mit unterschiedlichen Generationen im Unternehmen, Whitebooks, Gabal, Offenbach.Google Scholar
Merk, N. (2018), DriveNow Kunden, telephone interview, Reutlingen, München.Google Scholar
Miaskiewicz, T. and Kozar, K.A. (2011), “Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes?”, Design Studies, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 417–430. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003.Google Scholar
Montignies, F., Nosulenko, V. and Parizet, E. (2010), “Empirical identification of perceptual criteria for customer-centred design. Focus on the sound of tapping on the dashboard when exploring a car”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 592–603. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.04.004.Google Scholar
Naderer, G. and Balzer, E. (2007), Qualitative Marktforschung in Theorie und Praxis, Vol. 1. Aufl., Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Naumann, L. (2016), “Im Fokus: Attraktivität von Carsharing-Angeboten”, Horizont, Vol. 26 February, p. 26, available at: https://www.horizont.net/media/media/13/2015-009_HOR-Report_Zukunft_der_Mobilitaet.pdf-128140.pdf (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Newcomb, D. (2015), Six New Innovations That Set The 2016 BMW 7 Series Apart, Forbes, (Ed.), available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougnewcomb/2015/09/04/six-new-innovations-that-set-the-2016-bmw-7-series-apart/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Polchow, Y. (2017), Carit, available at: https://www.car-it.com/iaa-sonderedition-2017 (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. and Heppelmann, J.E. (2014), “How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition”, Harvard Business Review, November 2014.Google Scholar
Ramzy, A. (2016), Tesla Model 3 Orders Surge Even Before Its Unveiling, New York Times (Ed.), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/02/business/international/tesla-model-3.html.Google Scholar
Schreier, H., Becker, U. and Heller, J. (2015), Evaluation CarSharing (EVA-CS) Landeshauptstadt München, Endbericht. teamred (Ed.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Shaheen, S.A. and Cohen, A.P. (2013), “Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends”, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 5–34. http://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.660103.Google Scholar
Statista (2016), Welche dieser Funktionen wünschen Sie sich für Ihr Auto?, Statista (Ed.), available at: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/633897/umfrage/funktionen-die-sich-autofahrer-in-deutschland-fuer-ihr-auto-wuenschen/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Statista (2017a), Für welchen Fahrzeugtyp würden Sie sich beim nächsten Autokauf entscheiden?, Statista (Ed.), available at: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/715205/umfrage/umfrage-zum-fahrzeugtyp-bei-zukuenftigem-pkw-kauf-in-deutschland-nach-geschlecht/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Statista (2017b), Planen Sie in den kommenden 2 Jahren die Anschaffung eines neuen Pkw - egal ob dienstlich oder privat?, Statista (Ed.), available at: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/715259/umfrage/umfrage-zur-planung-der-neuanschaffung-eines-pkw-in-deutschland/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Statista (2017c), Welche Fahrzeugmerkmale bei der Kaufentscheidung für Ihr Fahrzeug sind Ihnen besonders wichtig?, Statista (Ed.), available at: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/716905/umfrage/umfrage-zu-den-wichtigsten-fahrzeugmerkmalen-beim-autokauf-in-deutschland/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2018), Durchschnittliche Bruttomonatsverdienste, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (Ed.), available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesamtwirtschaftUmwelt/VerdiensteArbeitskosten/VerdiensteVerdienstunterschiede/Tabellen/Bruttomonatsverdienste.html (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Steg, L. (2005), “Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39 No. 2-3, pp. 147–162. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001.Google Scholar
Stillwater, T. and Kurani, K.S. (2013), “Drivers discuss ecodriving feedback: Goal setting, framing, and anchoring motivate new behaviors”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 19, pp. 85–96. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.03.007.Google Scholar
Turner, A. (2015), “Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest”, The Journal of Individual Psychology, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 103–113. http://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021.Google Scholar
Weßner, K. (2017), Hohe Kundenloyalität und weiteres Wachstum: puls Studie zum Siegeszug der SUVs, puls Marktforschung GmbH, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Wever, R., van Kuijk, J. and Boks, C. (2008), “User-centred design for sustainable behaviour”, International journal of sustainable engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 9–20. http://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802166205.Google Scholar