Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:29:50.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22.—Organic Scintillators with Improved Timing Characteristics.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

J. B. Birks
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
R. W. Pringle
Affiliation:
Nuclear Enterprises, Edinburgh

Synopsis

Theoretical and experimental studies have been made of the scintillation pulse shapes of organic scintillators. In a unitary crystal the pulse shape is characterised by the scintillation decay time τs. In solution scintillators additional parameters are required to describe the pulse shape: Δt, the pulse width (FWHM); tm, the time at which the intensity reaches a maximumpmax; and t½, the time at which the intensity reaches ½pmax. General relations are derived for τs, Δτ, τm, τ½, and pmax for binary liquid solutions in terms of molecular parameters, and the corresponding expression is given for the scintillation pulse shape of a binary plastic solution.

The scintillation pulse shapes of 4 binary liquid solutions and 12 binary and 15 ternary plastic solutions were measured using a single-photon sampling fluorometer. The results confirm the theoretical analysis. A new plastic scintillator (NE 111) with improved timing characteristics has thus been developed, and some of its applications in nuclear physics are briefly discussed. The time association of nuclear events can be measured to within 130 ps with this scintillator, the limiting factor being the time jitter of the photomultiplier itself.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bengtson, B. and Moszynski, M., 1970. Timing properties of scintillation counters. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 81, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, J. B., 1964. Theory and Practice of Scintillation Counting. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Birks, J. B., 1968. Energy transfer in organic systems. VI. Fluorescence response functions and scintillation pulse shapes. J. Phys. B., 1, 946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, J. B., 1970 a. Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules. London and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Birks, J. B., 1970 b. Triplet-triplet interactions in organic scintillators. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, J. B., 1971. Liquid scintillator solvents. Organic Scintillators and Liquid Scintillation Counting (Ed. Horrocks, D. L. and Peng, C.-T.) 3. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Birks, J. B. and Kuchela, K. N., 1961. Energy transfer in organic systems II. Solute-solute transfer in liquid solutions. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond., 77, 1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollini, D., et al., 1970. Accurate position determination of particle trajectories using plastic scintillation counters. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 81, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochavi, S., et al., 1970. E2 Transition Strengths between (1f ℸ12)±2 States of Ca42, Ti50, and Fe54 Phys. Rev. C., 2, 2241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Th., 1949. Experimentelle und theoretische Untersuchung des zwischenmolekularen Überangs von Elektroniregungsenergie. Z. Naturf., 4A, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, T. A. and Voltz, R., 1966. The time dependence of scintillation intensity in aromatic materials. Proc. Roy. Soc., A289, 424.Google Scholar
Moszynski, M. and Bengtson, B., 1971. Plasma delay and plasma time jitter in subnanosecond timing with a surface barrier detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 91, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, R. W., 1950. The Scintillation Counter. Nature, 166, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pringle, R. W., Black, L. D., Funt, B. L. and Sobering, S., 1953. A new quenching effect in liquid scintillators. Phys. Rev., 92, 1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Saville, R. J. and Ness, S., 1968. Experimental investigation of the time response of some organic scintillators. Proc. Colloque d'Electronique Nucléaire et Radioprotection, Toulouse, 2.Google Scholar