Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:51:08.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Twists and shear maps in nonlinear elasticity: explicit solutions and vanishing Jacobians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2019

Jonathan J. Bevan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK (j.bevan@surrey.ac.uk)
Sandra Käbisch
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK (j.bevan@surrey.ac.uk)

Abstract

In this paper we study constrained variational problems that are principally motivated by nonlinear elasticity theory. We examine, in particular, the relationship between the positivity of the Jacobian det ∇u and the uniqueness and regularity of energy minimizers u that are either twist maps or shear maps. We exhibit explicit twist maps, defined on two-dimensional annuli, that are stationary points of an appropriate energy functional and whose Jacobian vanishes on a set of positive measure in the annulus. Within the class of shear maps we precisely characterize the unique global energy minimizer $u_{\sigma }: \Omega \to {\open R}^2$ in a model, two-dimensional case. We exploit the Jacobian constraint $\det \nabla u_{\sigma} \gt 0$ a.e. to obtain regularity results that apply ‘up to the boundary’ of domains with corners. It is shown that the unique shear map minimizer has the properties that (i) $\det \nabla u_{\sigma }$ is strictly positive on one part of the domain Ω, (ii) $\det \nabla u_{\sigma } = 0$ necessarily holds on the rest of Ω, and (iii) properties (i) and (ii) combine to ensure that $\nabla u_{\sigma }$ is not continuous on the whole domain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Ball, J. M.. Minimizers and the Euler-Lagrange equations. In Trends and Applications of Pure Mathematics to Mechanics (ed. Ciarlet, P. and Roseau, M.). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 195, pp. 14 (New York: Springer, 1984).Google Scholar
2Ball, J. M.. Some open problems in elasticity. In Geometry, Mechanics and Dynamics (ed. Newton, P., Holmes, P. and Weinstein, A.). pp. 359 (New York: Springer, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Ball, J. M. and Murat, F.. W 1, p-quasiconvexity and variational problems for multiple integrals. J. Funct. Anal. 58 (1984), 225253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Bauman, P., Owen, N. C. and Phillips, D.. Maximum principles and a priori estimates for a class of problems from nonlinear elasticity. Annales de l'institut Henri Poincaré (C) Analyse non linéaire 8 (1991a), 119157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Bauman, P., Owen, N. C. and Phillips, D.. Maximal smoothness of solutions to certain Euler-Lagrange equations from nonlinear elasticity. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Math. 119 (1991b), 241263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bevan, J. J.. Extending the Knops-Stuart-Taheri technique to C 1 weak local minimizers in nonlinear elasticity. Proc. AMS 193 (2011), 16671679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Francfort, G. and Sivaloganathan, J.. On conservation laws and necessary conditions in the calculus of variations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Math. 132 (2002), 13611371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Giaquinta, M.. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 105 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
9Gilbarg, D. and Trudinger, N.. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order (Berlin: Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
10John, F.. Uniqueness of non-linear elastic equilibrium for prescribed boundary displacements and sufficiently small strains. Commun. Pure. Appl. Math. 25 (1972), 617634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Knops, R. J. and Stuart, C. A.. Quasiconvexity and uniqueness of equilibrium solutions in non-linear elasticity. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 86 (1984), 233249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Müller, S.. Higher integrability of determinants and weak convergence in L 1. J. Reine Angew. Math. 412 (1990), 2034.Google Scholar
13Post, K. D. E. and Sivaloganathan, J.. On homotopy conditions and the existence of multiple equilibria in finite elasticity. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Math. 127 (1997), 595614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Sivaloganathan, J. and Spector, S.. On the uniqueness of energy minimizers in finite elasticity. Preprint (2016).Google Scholar
15Taheri, A.. Quasiconvexity and Uniqueness of Stationary Points in the Multi-Dimensional Calculus of Variations. Proc. AMS 131 (2003), 31013107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Zhang, K.. Energy minimizers in nonlinear elastostatics and the implicit function theorem. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 114 (1991), 95117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar