Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T07:32:43.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marine Fish Cages—The Physical Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. Edwards  and
D. J. Edelsten
A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban.
D. J. Edelsten
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban.
Get access

Synopsis

The distributions of the four variables—temperature, salinity, currents and dissolved oxygen—are discussed with particular reference to the Scottish west coast. In fjords, the distributions are related to the sources of change—tides, freshwater runoff, winds and, in the case of currents, to friction, which makes currents very variable over small areas. Current speed in floating cages has been found less than that outside. A model of the oxygen concentration in such a cage has been used to examine the conditions of current and fish stocking density under which the cage can be operated without reaching dangerously low oxygen concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 75 , Issue 4: Fish Farming: Scientific and Technical Aspects , 1976 , pp. 207 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon., 1973. International Oceanographic Tables, 2, 83–89. National Institute of Oceanography of Great Britain and UNESCO.Google Scholar
Beamish, F. W. H., 1964. Respiration of fishes with special emphasis on standard oxygen consumption. II. Influence of weight and temperature on respiration of several species. Can. J.Zool., 42,177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J. R., 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. J. Fish Res. Bd Can., 21, 1183–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J. R., 1965. The relation of size to rate of oxygen consumption and sustained swimming speed of sockeye salmon oncorhynchus nerka. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 22, 1491–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. E., 1959. Hydrography of Scottish coastal waters. Mar. Res., 2.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. and Edelsten, D. J., 1976. Control of fjordic deep water renewal by runoff modification. Bull. Inf. Ass. Int. Hydro!. Scient., 21, 445–450.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. R. C.Finlayson, D. M. and Steele, J. H., 1972. An experimental study of the oxygen consumption, growth, and metabolism of the cod (Gadus morhua L.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 8, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gade, H. G., 1963. Some oceanographic observations of the inner Oslo fjord during 1959. Hvalråd. Skr., 46, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Hisaoka, M., Nogami, K., Takeuchi, O.,Suzuki, M. and Sugmoto, H., 1966. Studies on sea water exchange in fish farm—II. Exchange of sea water in floating net. Bull. Naikai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab., 115, 21–43.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, J., 1963. On the exchange of gases between the atmosphere and the sea. Deep Sea Res., 10, 195–207.Google Scholar
Landless, P. J., 1974. An economical floating cage for marine culture. Aquaculture, 4, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landless, P. J. and Edwards, A., 1976. Economical methods of assessing hydrography for fish farms. Aquaculture, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, P. H. 1972a. Hydrography of Scottish west coast sea lochs. Mar. Res., 3, 50 pp.Google Scholar
Milne, P. H., 1912b. Fish and Shellfish Farming in Coastal Waters. Fishing News (Books), London, 208 pp.Google Scholar
Rao, G. M. M., 1971. Influence of activity and salinity on the weight dependent oxygen consumption of the rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri. Mar. Biol., 8, 205–212.Google Scholar
Wood, B. J. B., Tett, P. B. and Edwards, A., 1973. An introduction to the phytoplankton, primary production and relevant hydrography of Loch Etive. J. Ecol., 61, 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar