Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-23T13:25:38.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Paul Humphreys
Paul Humphreys*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A great deal of attention has been paid by philosophers to the use of computers in the modelling of human cognitive capacities and in the construction of intelligent artifacts. This emphasis has tended to obscure the fact that most of the high-level computing power in science is deployed in what appears to be a much less exciting activity: solving equations. This apparently mundane set of applications reflects the historical origins of modem computing, in the sense that most of the early computers in Britain and the U.S. were devices built to numerically attack mathematical problems that were hard, if not impossible, to solve non-numerically, especially in the areas of ballistics and fluid dynamics. The latter area was especially important for the development of atomic weapons at Los Alamos, and it is still true that a large portion of the supercomputing capacity of the United States is concentrated at weapons development laboratories such as Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore.

Information

Type
Part XIII. Computer Simulations in the Physical Sciences
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 496 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

1

Research for this paper was supported by NSF grant DIR-8911393. I should like to thank Fritz Rohrlich for helpful discussions in connection with the PSA symposium

References

Bennett, A.W. (1974), Introduction to Computer Simulation. St. Paul, West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Denef, J. and Lipshitz, L. (1984), “Power Series Solutions of Algebraic Differential Equations”, Mathematische Annalen, 267:213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denef, J. and Lipshitz, L. (1989), “Decision Problems for Differential Equations” J. Symbolic Logic 54:941–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyring, H., Walter, J., and Kimball, G. (1944), Quantum Chemistry. New York, J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1980), Classical Mechanics, (2nd Edition). Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Jaskowski, S. (1954), “Example of a Class of Systems of Ordinary Differential Equations Having No Decision Method for Existence Problems” Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Classes III, vol. 2, pp. 155–157.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. and Rumelhart, D. (1986), Parallel Distributed Processing, Vols 1,2. Cambridge, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McWeeny, R. and Sutcliffe, B.T. (1969), Methods of Molecular Quantum Mechanics, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neelamkavil, F., (1987), Computer Simulation and Modelling, New York, J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Ord-Smith, R.J. and Stephenson, J. (1975), Computer Simulation of Continuous Systems. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, R. (1987), “Epistemology of Knowledge-Based Systems”, Simulation, 48:161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrlich, F. (1991), “Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences”, in PSA 1990, Volume 2, Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Wessels, L. (eds). East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 497–506.Google Scholar