Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T17:52:42.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy of Medicine: Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Marjorie Grene
Marjorie Grene*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The question before us is hard to get a handle on, or so I have found. For one thing, philosophy of science has been for almost half a century a growing industry, by now indeed a far flung empire, with its national and international organizations, its subsidiaries, its power struggles, its captains of industry, its apprentices and rising young executives. You name it, we've got it! Philosophy of medicine, on the other hand, though growing fast, largely, I fear, for practical rather than intellectual reasons, is a late comer. There isn't as much of it and there hasn't been time to develop the schisms that really make an academic discipline look as if it's doing something. For philosophy of medicine to instruct philosophy of science, therefore, seems a little like the corner grocer's telling General Foods how to run their business.

Type
Part II. What Does Philosophy of Medicine Have to Do with Philosophy of Science?
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1976 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1976 , 1976 , pp. 77 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Canguilhem, Georges La Connaissance de la Vie. Paris: Vrin, 1965.Google Scholar
[2] Canguilhem, Georges Le Normal et le Pathologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966.Google Scholar
[3] Hampshire, Stuart Thought and Action. New York: Viking Press, 1960.Google Scholar
[4] Margolis, Joseph Values and Conduct. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[5] Murray, John F. The Normal Lung: The Basis for Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1976.Google Scholar
[6] Pantin, C.F.A. The Relations Between the Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
[7] Stenzel, H.B. “A Generic Character, Can it be Lacking in Individuals of the Species in a Given Genus.” Systematic Zoology 12(1963): 118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Ziman, John. Public Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968Google Scholar