Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE–OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare

  • Chris Leach (a1), Mike Lucock (a2), Michael Barkham (a3), Rachael Noble, Linda Clarke (a4) and Steve Iveson (a5)...
Abstract
Aims and Method

There is interest in how outcome measures routinely used in mental health settings compare with each other in assessing risk and emotional disturbance. The relation between the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure (CORE–OM), a client-completed measure, and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS), a clinician-completed measure, was explored using data from 297 clients referred to secondary services by a primary care mental health liaison team.

Results

The correlation between CORE–OM and HoNOS was 0.50, with cluster and factor analyses revealing overlap between the measures in assessing risk to self and others and general emotional issues.

Clinical Implications

Although the measures are typically used in different settings, the overlap suggests that both might be useful in any setting where assessment for mental health problems and risk is needed.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE–OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE–OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE–OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Audin, K., Margison, F. R., Mellor Clark, J., et al (2001) Value of HoNOS in assessing patient change in NHS psychotherapy and psychological treatment services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 561566.
Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., et al (2001) Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: towards practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184196.
Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., et al (2005) Suitability and utility of the CORE–OM and CORE–A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 239246.
Beck, A.T. & Steer, R. A. (1993) Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., et al (1976) The Global Assessment Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766771.
Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., et al (2002) Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 5160.
Fonagy, P., Matthews, R. & Pilling, S. (2004) The Mental Health Outcomes Measurement Initiative: Report from the Chair of the Outcomes Reference Group. London: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Department of Health.
Goldberg, D. P. (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Slough: NFER/Nelson.
Kazarian, S. S. & Joseph, L.W. (1994) A brief scale to help identify outpatients' level of need for community support services. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 935937.
Leach, C., Lucock, M., Barkham, M., et al (2005) Transforming between Beck Depression Inventory and CORE–OM scores in routine clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, in press.
Mcclelland, R., Trimble, P., Fox, M. L., et al (1998) Validation of an outcome scale for use in adult psychiatric practice. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 9, 98105.
National Institute for Mental Health in England (2002) Outcome Measures for Routine Practice in Mental Health Services. London: NIMHE (http://83.223.102.91/archivepolicy/nsf.asp).
National Institute for Mental Health in England (2004) Organising and Delivering Psychological Therapies. London: NIMHE.
Orrell, M., Yard, P., Handysides, J., et al (1999) Validity and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in psychiatric patients in the community. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 409412.
Overall, J. E. & Gorham, D. R. (1962) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799812.
Ozer, D. J. (1985) Correlation and the coefficient of determination. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307315.
Rees, A., Richards, A. & Shapiro, D. A. (2004) Utility of the HoNOS in measuring change in a Community Mental Health Care population. Journal of Mental Health, 13, 295304.
Ware, J. E. & Sherbourne, C. D. (1990) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF–36): conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473483.
Wing, J. K., Beevor, A. S., Curtis, R. H., et al (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 1118.
Wykes, T. & Sturt, E. (1986) The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 111.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 21st May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE–OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare

  • Chris Leach (a1), Mike Lucock (a2), Michael Barkham (a3), Rachael Noble, Linda Clarke (a4) and Steve Iveson (a5)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *