Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of using supervised discharge Results of a national survey

  • Donna Franklin (a1), Vanessa Pinfold (a2), Jonathan Bindman (a2) and Graham Thornicroft (a2)
Abstract
Aims and Method

Supervised discharge orders (SDOs) enable a degree of compulsion to be exerted over patients in the community. We aimed to establish the level of, and reasons for, their use and consultants' perceptions of their effectiveness. All mental health provider NHS trusts in England were surveyed, and a random sample cohort of cases was identified. Community responsible medical officers (CRMOs) were surveyed using a semi-structured questionnaire.

Results

We identified 596 cases subject to SDOs in 170 mental health provider trusts (100%) in England, involving 18% of consultant psychiatrists. Responses were obtained from the CRMOs of 185 patients (84%) from a sample of 221 cases. The SDO was described as helpful or very helpful in 77% of cases in which it had been in place for over 2 months. In 58% of cases the SDO was intended to improve medication compliance, and in 46% of these cases it was perceived to be effective in doing so.

Clinical Implications

SDOs are not widely used in England. However, for those patients who are made subject to supervised discharge, the order appears to be effective and may improve medication compliance, despite the absence of the legal power to enforce treatment.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of using supervised discharge Results of a national survey
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of using supervised discharge Results of a national survey
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of using supervised discharge Results of a national survey
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Burns, T. (1999) Invited commentary: community treatment orders. Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 647648.
Davies, S., Bruce, J. & Fallows, S. (1999) Section 25 Aftercare under supervision: the first eighteen months' experience. Medicine, Science and the Law, 39, 214218.
Department of Health (1993) Legal Powers on the Care of Mentally III People in the Community. Report of the Internal Review. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (1999) Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983: Proposals for Consultation. Cm 4480. London: Stationery Office.
Eastman, N. (1995) Anti-therapeutic community mental health law. British Medical Journal, 310, 10811082.
Knight, A., Mumford, D. & Nichol, B. (1998) Supervised discharge order: the first year in the South and West Region. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 418420.
Mays, N. & Pope, C. (1995) Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109112.
Moncrieff, J. & Smyth, M. (1999) Community treatment orders: a bridge too far? Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 644646.
Pinfold, V., Bindman, J., Friedli, K., et al (1999) Supervised discharge orders in England: compulsory care in the community. Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 199203.
Trauer, T. & Sacks, T. (1998) Medication compliance: a comparison of the views of severely mentally ill clients in the community, their doctors and their case managers. Journal of Mental Health, 7, 621629.
Weber, R. P. (1985) Basic Content Analysis: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (no. 49). London: Sage Publications.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 20th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of using supervised discharge Results of a national survey

  • Donna Franklin (a1), Vanessa Pinfold (a2), Jonathan Bindman (a2) and Graham Thornicroft (a2)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *