Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-h5th4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T12:51:35.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting your papers published

Or how to win editors and influence assessors∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Herschel Prins
Herschel Prins*
Affiliation:
1 Home Close Road, Houghton on the Hill, Leicester
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

During the past three years it has been my task and privilege to act as an assessor for The British Journal of Psychiatry. In this time I have assessed, and in some cases reassessed, over 30 papers. Having looked back on my comments on these papers a number of common criticisms emerge. I thought intending contributors to the Journal might find it helpful if I commented upon some of these. I hope I do so with a sense of humility, since it is always easy to criticise the work of others and appear to be patronising. However, I have the impression that if intending authors paid heed to some of my suggestions (which are certainly not original) they would save themselves a great deal of disappointment and save the assessors and the Editors of the Journal a degree of frustration and occasional irritation.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 14 - 15
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1989

References

Useful sources of guidance Google Scholar
In addition to dictionaries of one kind or another there are some other very useful sources of guidance for authors. I have listed a selection of these. The pamphlet by Booth is a very useful short primer.Google Scholar
Booth, V. (1975) Writing a Scientific Paper, (3rd edn). London: Biochemical Society in association with Koch-Light Laboratories. (This booklet of only 26 pages contains very relevant information in summary form).Google Scholar
Collins, F. H. (1969) Author's and Printer's Dictionary, (10th edn), London: Oxford University Press. (A very useful complement to the conventional dictionary. Contains some less familiar words and phrases).Google Scholar
Hart's Rules for Compositors and Readers at the Oxford University Press , (1970) (32nd edn). London: Oxford University Press. (Contains a mine of information about style, punctuation, grammar, spelling and the correction of proofs. Anyone who intends to write regularly would do well to possess this little book).Google Scholar
King, L. S. (1978) Why Not Say it Clearly? A Guide to Scientific Writing, Boston: Little Brown & Co. (A good introductory text aimed at a medical readership. Contains some useful and amusing examples of how not to express yourself!).Google Scholar
Linton, M. (1972) A Simplified Style Manual For the Preparation of Journal Articles in Psychology, Social Sciences, Education and Literature, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Although not intended primarily for medical writers this book contains some very relevant information).Google Scholar
Lock, S. (1977) Thorne's Better Medical Writing, (2nd edn), London: Pitman Publishing. (A useful introductory text for medical authors).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.