Skip to main content
×
×
Home

In hospital, at home, or not at all: A cross-sectional survey of patient preferences for receipt of compulsory treatment

  • Mike J. Crawford (a1), Rebecca Gibbon (a2), Elizabeth Ellis (a2) and Hannah Waters (a2)
Abstract
Aims and Method

In view of plans to reform Mental Health Act legislation to allow compulsory treatment in the community, we examined the views of service users about this form of care, and the most acceptable setting for its delivery. A cross-sectional survey of patients discharged from two in-patient units in West London over a 5-month period was carried out.

Results

Half of the 109 respondents stated that compulsory treatment was justified under some circumstances; 103 people told us where they would prefer to receive compulsory treatment – 49 in their home, 41 in hospital and 13 in a community treatment centre. The most commonly stated reason for favouring home treatment was dislike of in-patient care.

Clinical Implications

Compulsory treatment in the community may provide a means of improving patient experiences of non-consensual care. However, a significant minority of service users would rather this form of treatment was restricted to in-patient units. Continuing efforts are required to improve patient experiences of in-patient care.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      In hospital, at home, or not at all
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      In hospital, at home, or not at all
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      In hospital, at home, or not at all
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Crawford, M. J., Hopkins, W. & Henderson, C. (2000) Concerns over reform of the Mental Health Act [letter]. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 563.
David, A. S. (1990) Insight and psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 798808.
Department of Health (1999) Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983: Proposals for Consultation. London: Department of Health.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Greenwood, N., Key, A., Burns, T., et al (1999) Satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric services. Relationship to patient and treatment factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 159163.
Griffiths, H. (2002) Acute wards: problems and solutions. Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 428430.
Mind (2004) Are You Listening? Service Users Speak Out About Mental Health Act Reform. London: Mind.
Moncrieff, J. & Smyth, M. (1999) Community treatment orders – a bridge too far? Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 644646.
National Schizophrenia Fellowship (1999) Better Act Now! NSF's Views in the Mental Health Act Review. London: NSF.
Pinfold, V., Rowe, A., Hatfield, B., et al (2002) Lines of resistance: exploring professionals' views of compulsory community supervision. Journal of Mental Health, 11, 177190.
Shipley, K., Hilborn, B., Hansell, A., et al (2000) Patient satisfaction: a valid index of quality of care in a psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101, 303333.
Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J.W., Wagner, H. R., et al (2003) Assessment of four stakeholder groups' preferences concerning outpatient commitment for persons with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 11391146.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 7 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 21st July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

In hospital, at home, or not at all: A cross-sectional survey of patient preferences for receipt of compulsory treatment

  • Mike J. Crawford (a1), Rebecca Gibbon (a2), Elizabeth Ellis (a2) and Hannah Waters (a2)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *