Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-7x8lp Total loading time: 0.727 Render date: 2021-03-01T22:47:29.286Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

NICE guidelines on treating schizophrenia – audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rob Macpherson
Affiliation:
Wotton Lawn, Horton Rd, Gloucester GL1 3WL, email: rob.macpherson@glos.nhs.uk
Nicola Hovey
Affiliation:
Gloucestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Rikenell, Montpellier, Gloucester
Amjad Uppal
Affiliation:
Wotton lawn, Gloucester
Andy Thompson
Affiliation:
Orygen Youth Health, Melbourne, Australia
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article
Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008

We recently carried out an audit of clinical practice in our assertive community treatment team, against the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines on ‘core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia’ (NICE, 2002). The guidelines included recommendations that clinical practice should be audited against them and guidance about how to do this.

Our audit aimed to study the compliance with NICE guidelines in a specific team, using direct care-coordinator inquiry and to try to identify reasons for patients not receiving interventions recommended by NICE. Of the assertive community treatment team 84 case-load, 61 were diagnosed with schizophrenia (ICD–10). An eight-item audit tool was used to collect data from care coordinators, using a structured interview method.

We found variable levels of compliance, ranging from 0% for production of advance directive to 85% for the provision of written information to service users/carers. Where interventions were not carried out, this often appeared understandable. In the example of family therapy, only 20% had received formal approach but of the remainder 20% declined, 15% had other forms of family/care support, 51% were not in contact with their family and 8% had no clinical indication. Similarly, of the 21 cases where cognitive–behavioural therapy had not been offered, 11 were unable to make an informed choice and 3 had no persisting symptoms. Non-compliance was often associated with problems which seemed understandable and perhaps insurmountable. This raises questions about the utility of NICE guidelines as a means to guide best practice, and suggests that compliance with guidelines needs to be considered carefully in the context of the overall treatment plan.

The findings relating to cognitive–behavioural therapy and antipsychotic polypharmacy were interesting: several patients appeared to be choosing to continue to take more than one antipsychotic or not to have the therapy. This raises a dilemma, which seems common clinically, of how to promote best practice while also being mindful of patient choice and empowerment.

Although no patients had advance directives, 70% had crisis/’rainy day’ plans. It is our view that explicit managerial prioritisation would be needed to bring in a routine use of advance directives, and this is unlikely to occur. As Dopson et al (Reference Dopson, Locock and Cambers2001) point out, the key factors in implementing clinical guidelines are a strong evidence base, supportive opinion leaders and integration of the use of a guideline approach within an organisation.

Our perception is that the link between clinical interventions and outcome, particularly in the treatment of mental disorders, is not straightforward. Dent & Sadler (Reference Dent and Sadler2002) rightly note that professionals perceive ambiguity about how NICE reaches its conclusions, the lack of consistent support for implementation and uncertainty about who should monitor compliance.

We found the results of the audit interesting and it has enabled a form of reflective practice at the team level. We would be interested to hear from other teams that have gone through a similar process, and recommend the method used as a simple way to benchmark a team's work and consider training needs. Further audit and research into the impact of guidelines on meeting the needs of individuals with severe mental illness is needed.

References

Dent, T. H. & Sadler, M. (2002) From guidance to practice: why NICE is not enough. BMJ, 324, 842845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dopson, S., Locock, L., Cambers, D., et al (2001) Implementation of evidence-based medicine: evaluation of the Promoting Action on Clinical Effectiveness programme. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 187, 248255.Google Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002) Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=byID&o=10916.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd January 2018 - 1st March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Open access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

NICE guidelines on treating schizophrenia – audit
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

NICE guidelines on treating schizophrenia – audit
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

NICE guidelines on treating schizophrenia – audit
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *