Atkinson, M. (1994) Regulation of science by peer review. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 25, 147–158.
Barber, B. (1961) Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596–602.
Bornstein, R. F. (1990) Epistemic progress and journal page limitations: a proposal for increasing the base rate of manuscript acceptance in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 45, 673–674.
Bradley, J. V. (1982) Editorial overkill. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 271–274.
Cotton, P. (1993) Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 2775–2778.
Finke, R. A. (1990) Recommendations for contemporary editorial practices. American Psychologist, 45, 669–670,
Iltis, H. (1966) Life of Mendel
New York: Hafner.
Ingelfinger, F. J. (1974) Peer review in biomedical publication. American Journal of Medicine, 56, 686–692.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lock, S. (1986) Getting the balance right. British Medical Journal, 292, 428–429.
Marsh, H. W. & Ball, S. (1989) The peer review process used to evaluate manuscripts submitted to academic journals: interjudgmental reliability. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 151–169.
O'Connor, M. (1978) Editing Scientific Books and Journals.
Tunbridge Wells: Pitman-Medical.
Peters, D. P. & Ceci, S. (1982) Peer review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles. submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187–195.
Wilkinson, G. (1995) Jim Birley in conversation with Greg Wilkinson. Psychiatric Bulletin, 19, 33–30.