Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-qvhhc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-13T00:27:15.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological treatment of social anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2008

C. Acarturk*
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit University Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
P. Cuijpers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit University Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), Utrecht, The Netherlands
A. van Straten
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit University Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
R. de Graaf
Affiliation:
Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
*Address for correspondence: C. Acarturk, M.Sc., Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (Email: c.acarturk@psy.vu.nl)

Abstract

Background

Older meta-analyses of the effects of psychological treatments of social anxiety disorder have found that these treatments have moderate to large effects. However, these earlier meta-analyses also included non-randomized studies, and there are many featured studies in this area which were published after the recent meta-analysis.

Method

We conducted a systematic literature search and identified 29 randomized studies examining the effects of psychological treatments, with a total of 1628 subjects. The quality of studies varied. For the analyses, we used the computer program comprehensive meta-analysis (version 2.2.021; Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA).

Results

The mean effect size on social anxiety measures (47 contrast groups) was 0.70, 0.80 on cognitive measures (26 contrast groups) and 0.70 both on depression (19 contrast groups) and general anxiety measures (16 contrast groups). We found some heterogeneity, so we conducted a series of subgroup analyses for different variables of the studies. Studies with waiting-list control groups had significantly larger effect sizes than studies with placebo and treatment-as-usual control groups. Studies aimed at subjects who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for social anxiety disorder had smaller effect sizes than studies in which other inclusion criteria were used.

Conclusions

This study once more makes it clear that psychological treatments of social anxiety disorder are effective in adults, but that they may be less effective in more severe disorders and in studies in which care-as-usual and placebo control groups are used.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable