Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.275 Render date: 2021-10-16T22:48:06.983Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2014

A. van Straten*
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
J. Hill
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
D. A. Richards
Affiliation:
University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
P. Cuijpers
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
* Address for correspondence: A. van Straten, Ph.D., VU University, FPP, Department of Clinical Psychology, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (Email: a.van.straten@vu.nl)

Abstract

Background

In stepped care models patients typically start with a low-intensity evidence-based treatment. Progress is monitored systematically and those patients who do not respond adequately step up to a subsequent treatment of higher intensity. Despite the fact that many guidelines have endorsed this stepped care principle it is not clear if stepped care really delivers similar or better patient outcomes against lower costs compared with other systems. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized trials on stepped care for depression.

Method

We carried out a comprehensive literature search. Selection of studies, evaluation of study quality and extraction of data were performed independently by two authors.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included and 10 were used in the meta-analyses (4580 patients). All studies used screening to identify possible patients and care as usual as a comparator. Study quality was relatively high. Stepped care had a moderate effect on depression (pooled 6-month between-group effect size Cohen's d was 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.20–0.48). The stepped care interventions varied greatly in number and duration of treatment steps, treatments offered, professionals involved, and criteria to step up.

Conclusions

There is currently only limited evidence to suggest that stepped care should be the dominant model of treatment organization. Evidence on (cost-) effectiveness compared with high-intensity psychological therapy alone, as well as with matched care, is required.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, G, Cuijpers, P, Craske, MG, McEvoy, P, Titov, N (2010). Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 5, e13196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G, Tolkein II Team (2006). A Needs-Based, Costed Stepped-Care Model for Mental Health Services. CRUFAD, University of New South Wales: Sydney.Google Scholar
Apil, SRA, Hoencamp, E, Haffmans, PMJ, Spinhoven, P (2012). A stepped care relapse prevention program for depression in older people: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Geriatratric Psychiatry 27, 583591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araya, R, Flynn, T, Rojas, G, Fritsch, R, Simon, G (2006). Cost-effectiveness of a primary care treatment program for depression in low-income women in Santiago, Chile. American Journal of Psychiatry 163, 13791387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araya, R, Rojas, G, Fritsch, R, Gaete, J, Rojas, M, Simon, G, Peters, TJ (2003). Treating depression in primary care in low-income women in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361, 9951000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, J, Bower, P, Gilbody, S, Lovell, K, Richards, D, Gask, L, Dickens, C, Coventry, P (2012). Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD006525.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J, Richards, DA, Farrand, P (2010). Low intensity CBT interventions: a revolution in mental health care. In Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Richards, D. A., Farrand, P., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., Kavanagh, D. J., Klein, B., Lau, M. A., Proudfoot, J., Ritterband, L., White, J. and Williams, C.), pp. 318. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bijl, RV, de Graaf, R, Hiripi, E, Kessler, RC, Kohn, R, Offord, DR, Ustun, TB, Vicente, B, Vollebergh, WAM, Walters, EE, Wittchen, HU (2003) The prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders in five countries. Health Affairs 22, 122133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bot, M, Pouwer, F, Ormel, J, Slaets, JP, de Jonge, P (2010). Predictors of incident major depression in diabetic outpatients with subthreshold depression. Diabetic Medicine 27, 12951301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, P, Gilbody, S (2005). Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency – narrative literature review. British Journal of Psychiatry 186, 1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, P, Gilbody, S, Richards, D, Fletcher, J, Sutton, A (2006). Collaborative care for depression in primary care – making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression. British Journal of Psychiatry 189, 484493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, P, Kontopantelis, E, Sutton, A, Kendrick, T, Richards, DA, Gilbody, S, Knowles, S, Cuijpers, P, Andersson, G, Christensen, H, Meyer, B, Huibers, M, Smit, F, van Straten, A, Warmerdam, L, Barkham, M, Bilich, L, Lovell, K, Liu, ET (2013). Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data. British Medical Journal 346, f540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braamse, AMJ, van Meijel, B, Visser, O, van Oppen, P, Boenink, AD, Eeltink, C, Cuijpers, P, Huijgens, PC, Beekman, ATF, Dekker, J (2010). Distress and quality of life after autologous stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the outcome of a web-based stepped care intervention. BMC Cancer 10, 361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buttorff, C, Hock, RS, Weiss, HA, Naik, S, Araya, R, Kirkwood, BR, Chisholm, D, Patel, V (2012). Economic evaluation of a task-shifting intervention for common mental disorders in India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 90, 813821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, DM (2011). Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. International Review of Psychiatry 23, 318327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, H, Hedges, LV (1994). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation Press: New York.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P, Beekman, ATF, Reynolds, CF III (2012). Preventing depression. A global priority. Journal of the American Medical Association 307, 10331034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuijpers, P, Donker, T, van Straten, A, Li, J, Andersson, G (2010). Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological Medicine 40, 19431957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, KW, Bigger, JT, Burg, MM, Carney, RM, Chaplin, WF, Czajkowski, S, Dornelas, E, Duer-Hefele, J, Frasure-Smith, N, Freedland, KE, Haas, DC, Jaffe, AS, Ladapo, JA, Lesperance, F, Medina, V, Newman, JD, Osorio, GA, Parsons, F, Schwartz, JE, Shaffer, JA, Shapiro, PA, Shep, DS, Vaccarino, V, Whang, GW, Ye, S (2013). Centralized, stepped, patient preference-based treatment for patients with post-acute coronary syndrome depression: CODIACS Vanguard randomized controlled trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 173, 9971004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, KW, Rieckmann, N, Clemow, L, Schwartz, JE, Shimbdo, D, Medina, V, Albanese, G, Kronish, I, Hegel, M, Burg, MM (2010). Enhanced depression care for patients with acute coronary syndrome and persistent depressive symptoms. Archives of Internal Medicine 170, 600608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dozeman, E, van Marwijk, HW, van Schaik, DJ, Smit, F, Stek, ML, van der Horst, HE, Bohlmeijer, ET, Beekman, AT (2012). Contradictory effects for prevention of depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the elderly: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. International Psychogeriatrics 24, 12421251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duval, S, Tweedie, R (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56, 455463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ell, K, Katon, W, Xie, B, Lee, PJ, Kaoetanovic, S, Guterman, J, Chou, CP (2010). Collaborative care management of major depression among low-income, predominantly Hispanic subjects with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 33, 706713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ell, K, Xie, B, Quon, B, Quinn, DI, Dwight-Johnson, M, Lee, PJ (2008). Randomized controlled trial of collaborative care management of depression among low-income patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 26, 44884496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gellatly, J, Bower, P, Hennessy, S, Richards, D, Gilbody, S, Lovell, K (2007). What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine 37, 12171228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, J, Diggens, J, Hegarty, K, Blashki, G (2006). A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care. BMC Health Services Research 6, 88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, JW, Katon, WJ, Ell, K, Lee, P-J, Guterman, JJ (2012). Cost effectiveness analysis of collaborative care management of major depression among low-income, predominantly Hispanics with diabetes. Value Health 15, 249254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedges, LV, Olkin, I (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.Google ScholarPubMed
Higgins, JPT, Green, S (ed.) (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) (www.cochrane-handbook.org). Accessed March 2014.Google Scholar
Huijbregts, KM, de Jong, FJ, van Marwijk, HW, Beekman, AT, Ader, HJ, Hakkaart-van Roijen, L, Unutzer, J, van der Feltz-Cornelis, CM (2013). A target-driven collaborative care model for major depressive disorder is effective in primary care in the Netherlands. A randomized clinical trial from the depression initiative. Journal of Affective Disorders 146, 328337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katon, W, Unutzer, J (2006). Collaborative care models for depression – time to move from evidence to practice. Archives of Internal Medicine 166, 23042306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katon, WJ, Schoenbaum, M, Fan, M-Y, Callahan, CM, Williams, J, Hunkeler, E, Harpole, L, Zhou, X-HA, Langston, C, Unutzer, J (2005). Cost-effectiveness of improving primary care treatment of late-life depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 13131320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katon, WJ, von Korff, M, Lin, EHB, Simon, G, Ludman, E, Russo, J, Ciechanowski, P, Walker, E, Bush, T (2004). The Pathways Study. A randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 61, 10421049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebber, A-MH, Leemans, CR, de Bree, R, van Straten, A, Smit, F, Smit, EF, Becker, A, Eeckhout, GM, Beekman, ATF, Cuijpers, P, Verdonck-de Leeuw, IM (2012). Stepped care targeting psychological distress in head and neck and lung cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer 12, 173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladapo, JA, Shaffer, JA, Fang, Y, Ye, S, Davidson, KW (2012). Cost-effectiveness of enhanced depression care after acute coronary syndrome: results from the Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Studies Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Internal Medicine 172, 16821683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipsey, MW, Wilson, DB (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational and behavioural treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist 48, 11811209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, K, Richards, D (2000). Multiple Access Points and Levels of Entry (MAPLE): ensuring choice, accessibility and equity for CBT services. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 28, 379391.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (2010). Depression: The NICE Guideline on the Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults, updated edition. British Psychological Society and Royal College of Psychiatrists: London.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Depression in Adults. The Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 90. NICE: London.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011). Common Mental Health Disorders: Identification and Pathways to Care. National Clinical Guideline CG123. NICE: London.Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, V, Weiss, HA, Neerja, C, Smita, N, Sulochana, P, Chatterjee, S, de Silva, MJ, Bhat, B, Araya, R, King, M, Simon, G, Verdeli, H, Kirkwood, BR (2010). Effectiveness of an intervention led by lay health counsellors for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care in Goa, India (MANAS): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376, 20862095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piek, E, Nolen, WA, van der Meer, K, Joling, KJ, Kollen, BJ, Penninx, BWJH, van Marwijk, HWJ, van Hout, HPJ (2012). Determinants of (non-)recognition of depression by general practitioners: results of the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders 138, 397404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piek, E, van der Meer, K, Penninx, BWJH, Verhaak, PFM, Nolen, WA (2011). Referral of patients with depression to mental health care by Dutch general practitioners: an observational study. BMC Family Practice 12, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommer, AM, Pouwer, F, Denollet, J, Pop, VJM (2012). Managing co-morbid depression and anxiety in primary care patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 13, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, D, Richardson, T (2012). Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 32, 329342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, DA, Bower, P, Pagel, C, Weaver, A, Utley, M, Cape, J, Pilling, S, Lovell, K, Gilbody, S, Leibowitz, J, Owens, L, Paxton, R, Hennessy, S, Simpson, S, Gallivan, S, Tomson, D, Vasilakis, C (2012). Delivering stepped care: an analysis of implementation in routine practice. Implementation Science 7, 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seekles, W, van Straten, A, Beekman, A, van Marwijk, H, Cuijpers, P (2011). Stepped care treatment for depression and anxiety in primary care. a randomized controlled trial. Trials 12, 171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, GE (2002). Evidence review: efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry 24, 213224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, GE, Katon, WJ, Lin, EHB, Rutter, C, Manning, WG, Von Korff, M, Ciechanoswki, P, Ludman, EJ, Young, BA (2007). Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment among people with diabetes mellitus. Archives of General Psychiatry 64, 6572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spijker, J, van Vliet, IM, Meeuwissen, JAC, van Balkom, AJLM (2010). Update of the multidisciplinary guidelines for anxiety and depression. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 52, 715718.Google ScholarPubMed
Unutzer, J, Katon, W, Callahan, CM, Williams, JW, Hunkeler, E, Harpole, L, Hoffing, M, Della Penna, RD, Noel, PH, Lin, EHB, Arean, PA, Hegel, M, Tang, LQ, Belin, TR, Oishi, S, Langston, C; for the IMPACT Investigators (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 288, 28362845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Weele, GM, de Waal, MWM, van den Hout, WB, de Craen, AJM, Spinhoven, P, Stijnen, T, Assendelft, WJJ, van der Mast, RC, Gussekloo, J (2012). Effects of a stepped-care intervention programme among older subjects who screened positive for depressive symptoms in general practice: the PROMODE randomized controlled trial. Age and Ageing 41, 482488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, SEM, Pols, AD, Adriaanse, MC, Bosmans, JE, Elders, PJM, van Marwijk, HWJ, van Tulder, MW (2013). Cost-effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention to prevent major depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease and subthreshold depression: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 13, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van ‘t Veer-Tazelaar, PJ, Smit, F, van Hout, HPJ, van Oppen, P, van der Horst, HE, Beekman, ATF, van Marwijk, HWJ (2010). Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care intervention to prevent depression and anxiety in late life: randomised trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 196, 319325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van ‘t Veer-Tazelaar, PJ, van Marwijk, HWJ, van Oppen, P, van Hout, HPJ, van der Horst, HE, Cuijpers, P, Smit, F, Beekman, ATF (2009). Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry 66, 297304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
116
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *