Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T12:29:29.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing relatives' needs for psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: a relatives' version of the Cardinal Needs Schedule (RCNS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 1998

C. BARROWCLOUGH
Affiliation:
From the School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester and Clinical Psychology Department, Withington Hospital, Manchester
M. MARSHALL
Affiliation:
From the School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester and Clinical Psychology Department, Withington Hospital, Manchester
A. LOCKWOOD
Affiliation:
From the School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester and Clinical Psychology Department, Withington Hospital, Manchester
J. QUINN
Affiliation:
From the School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester and Clinical Psychology Department, Withington Hospital, Manchester
W. SELLWOOD
Affiliation:
From the School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester and Clinical Psychology Department, Withington Hospital, Manchester

Abstract

Background. The methodology for measuring the needs of patients with severe mental illness is now well established through the MRC Needs for Care Assessment Schedule and its modification in the form of the Cardinal Needs Assessment. This paper reports the rationale and construction of a relatives' version of the Cardinal Needs Schedule and looks at preliminary data reporting on reliability and validity.

Methods. Potential problem areas for relatives were identified from the literature. The criteria determining Cardinal Needs for each problem included objective threshold, carer concern, and carer cooperation. The reliability of the Schedule was assessed in a study whereby 27 relatives of patients with established schizophrenic illness completed two Schedules administered by two independent raters within a short time period.

Results. The Schedule was acceptably reliable for most areas of need although there were some difficulties associated with the cooperation criteria. Concurrent measures of relatives and patients including EE, relative distress and patient psychopathology indicated that the Relatives' Cardinal Needs Schedule shows acceptable validity when used with a sample of 45 relatives.

Conclusions. The paper suggests that the Schedule may prove to be a useful tool for both clinicians and researchers interested in establishing and evaluating family interventions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)