Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T14:33:41.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A controlled investigation of right hemispheric processing enhancement after restricted environmental stimulation (REST) with floatation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Jody Raab  and
John Gruzelier
Jody Raab
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics; and Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, University of London
John Gruzelier*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics; and Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, University of London
*
1 Address for correspondence: Dr John Gruzelier, Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, University of London, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Two groups of 16 subjects, 8 of each gender, were examined on two occasions, one group before and after restricted environmental stimulation with floatation, and the other group without floatation was the control group. They were examined with a tactile object discrimination task carried out with each hand separately while blindfolded, and with a recognition memory test for words and unfamiliar faces, a test validated on neurological patients with left and right hemispheric lesions respectively. Consistent with both tasks the floatation group showed a significantly greater enhancement of right hemispheric processing after floatation than was found when retesting the controls. The results were distinguished from previous research on hypnosis where the same relative state of hemispheric imbalance was achieved with the same tasks, but largely through inhibitory influences on the left hemisphere.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 457 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barabasz, A. F. (1982). Restricted environmental stimulation and the enhancement of hypnotizability, P.A.M., EEG, alpha, skin conductance and temperature responses. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2, 147–166.Google Scholar
Barabasz, A. (1990). Spontaneous hypnosis in floatation restricted environmental stimulation. In Hypnosis: Current Theory, Research and Practice (ed. van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P. H. and van der Does, A. L. W.), pp. 113–120. VU University Press: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Barabasz, A. & Barabasz, M. (1989). Effects of restricted environmental stimulation (REST) in hypnotizability with chronic pain patients. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 37, 217–231.Google Scholar
Barabasz, A. F., Barabasz, M., Dyer, R. & Rather, N. (1992). Effects of chamber REST, floatation REST, and relaxation on transient mood state. In Clinical and Experimental Restricted Environmental Stimulation: New Developments and Perspectives (ed. Barabasz, A. F. and Barabasz, M.), pp. 41–52. Springer Verlag: New York.Google Scholar
Budzynski, T. (1990). Hemispheric asymmetry and REST. In Restricted Environmental Stimulation: Theoretical and Empirical Developments in Floatation REST (ed. Suedfeld, P., Turner, F. W. and Fine, T. H.), pp. 120–130. Springer Verlag: New York.Google Scholar
Cikurel, K. & Gruzelier, J. H. (1990). The effect of an active-alert hypnotic induction on lateral asymmetry in haptic processing. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis 1, 17–25.Google Scholar
Conway, A. V. & Gruzelier, J. H. (1994). Lateral asymmetry in electrodermal responses in conditions of baseline, hyperventilation and laboratory stressors in relation to anxiety and cardiovascular susceptibility factors. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Cooper, G. D., Adams, H. B. & Scott, J. C. (1988). Studies in REST I: Reduced environmental stimulation therapy (REST) and reduced alcohol consumption. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 5, 61–68.Google Scholar
Crawford, H. J. & Gruzelier, J. H. (1992). A midstream view of the neuropsychology of hypnosis: recent research and future directions. In Contemporary Perspectives in Hypnosis Research (ed. Fromm, E. and Nash, M.), pp. 227–266. Guildford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Fine, T. H. & Turner, J. W. (1982). The effect of brief restricted environmental therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Behaviour Research Therapy 20, 567–570.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. (1987). Individual differences in dynamic process asymmetries in the normal and pathological brain. In Individual Differences in Hemispheric Specialisation (ed. Glass, A.), pp. 301–330. Plenum: London.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. (1988). The neuropsychology of hypnosis. In Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices (ed. Heap, M.), pp. 68–76. Croom Helm: London.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. (1990). Neuropsychophysiological investigations of hypnosis: cerebral laterality and beyond. In Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Clinical Practice (ed. Van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P. H. and Van Der Does, A. L. W.), pp. 37–52. VU University Press: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. (1993). The laterality of electrodermal responses: A new perspective on individual differences in personality and psychopathology. In Progress in Electrodermal Research (ed. Roy, J.-C., Boucsein, W., Fowles, D. C. and Gruzelier, J. H.), pp. 257–270. Plenum: London.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. & Phelan, M. (1991). Laterality-reversal in a lexical divided visual field task under stress, International Journal of Psychophysiology 11, 269–276.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. & Warren, K. A. (1993). Neuropsychological evidence of left frontal inhibition and hypnosis in highly susceptible subjects. Psychological Medicine 23, 93–101.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H., Brow, T. D., Perry, A., Rhonder, J. & Thomas, M. (1984). Hypnotic susceptibility: a lateral predisposition and altered cerebral asymmetry under hypnosis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 83, 635–643.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H., Hancock, J. & Maggs, R. (1991). EEG topography during word versus face recognition in high and low susceptibles in baseline and hypnosis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 11, 36.Google Scholar
Kristeller, J. L., Schwartz, G. E. & Black, H. (1982). The use of restricted environmental stimulation therapy (REST) in the treatment of essential hypertension: two case studies. Behaviour Research and Therapy 20, 561–566.Google Scholar
Kugler, B. & Henley, S. (1979). Lateral effects in the tactile modality in schizophrenia. In Hemisphere Asymmetry of Function and Psychopathology (ed. Gruzelier, J. and Flor-Henry, P.), pp. 275–288. Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lilly, J. C. (1977). The Deep Self. Simon Schuster: New York.Google Scholar
McGrady, A., Turner, J. W., Fine, T. H. & Higgins, J. T. (1987). Effects of biobehaviorally-assisted relaxation training on blood pressure, plasma renin, cortisol, and aldosterone levels in borderline essential hypertension. Clinical Biofeedback and Health 10, 16–25.Google Scholar
Reiman, E. M., Raichle, M. E., Robbins, E., Butler, F., Herscovitch, P., Fox, P. & Perlmutter, J. (1986). The application of Positron Emission Tomography to the study of panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 143, 469–477.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. (1980). Restricted Environmental Stimulation. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. & Baker-Brown, G. (1987). Restricted environmental stimulation therapy and aversive conditioning in smoking cessation: active and placebo effects. Behaviour Research and Therapy 24, 421–428.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P., Roy, C. & Landon, P. B. (1982). Restricted environmental stimulation therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Behaviour Research and Therapy 20, 553–559.Google Scholar
Turner, J. W. & Fine, T. H. (1985). Effects of restricted environmental stimulation therapy (REST) on self-control of heart rate. Health and Clinical Psychology 1, 477–490.Google Scholar
Turner, J. W. & Fine, T. H. (1990). Restricted Environmental Stimulation: Research and Commentary. Medical College of Ohio Press: Ohio.Google Scholar
Turner, J. W. Jr. & Fine, T. H. (1991). Restricting environmental stimulation influences levels and variability of plasma cortisol. Journal of Applied Physiology 70, 2010–2013.Google Scholar