van Dooren, Fleur E.P. Verhey, Frans R.J. Pouwer, Frans Schalkwijk, Casper G. Sep, Simone J.S. Stehouwer, Coen D.A. Henry, Ronald M.A. Dagnelie, Pieter C. Schaper, Nicolaas C. van der Kallen, Carla J.H. Koster, Annemarie Schram, Miranda T. and Denollet, Johan 2017. Association of Type D personality with increased vulnerability to depression: Is there a role for inflammation or endothelial dysfunction? – The Maastricht Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 189, p. 118.
Kupper, Nina Pedersen, Susanne S. Höfer, Stefan Saner, Hugo Oldridge, Neil and Denollet, Johan 2017. Cross-cultural analysis of Type D (distressed) personality in 6222 patients with ischemic heart disease: A study from the International HeartQoL Project. International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 166, Issue. 2, p. 327.
Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon and van Reekum, Robert 2017. Social inhibition as a mediator of neuroticism and depression in the elderly. BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,
Denollet, Johan Gidron, Yori Vrints, Christiaan J. and Conraads, Viviane M. 2017. Anger, Suppressed Anger, and Risk of Adverse Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 105, Issue. 11, p. 1555.
Kunst, Maarten J. J. Bogaerts, Stefan and Winkel, Frans W. 2017. Peer and inmate aggression, type D-personality and post-traumatic stress among Dutch prison workers. Stress and Health, Vol. 25, Issue. 5, p. 387.
Van Hiel, Alain and De Clercq, Barbara 2017. Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 33.
Razzini, Cinzia Bianchi, Francesco Leo, Roberto Fortuna, Enzo Siracusano, Alberto and Romeo, Francesco 2017. Correlations between personality factors and coronary artery disease: from type A behaviour pattern to type D personality. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol. 9, Issue. 8, p. 761.
Song, Eun Kyeung and Son, Youn Jung 2017. The Analysis of Type D Personality Research as a Psychosocial Risk Factor in Cardiovascular Disease for Elders with a Chronic Disease. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 19.
Kupper, Nina and Denollet, Johan 2017. Type D Personality as a Prognostic Factor in Heart Disease: Assessment and Mediating Mechanisms. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 89, Issue. 3, p. 265.
SCHIFFER, ANGÉLIQUE A. DENOLLET, JOHAN PEDERSEN, SUSANNE S. BROERS, HERMAN and WIDDERSHOVEN, JOS W. 2017. Health Status in Patients Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Modulating Effects of Personality. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 28.
André-Petersson, Lena Hagberg, Bo Janzon, Lars and Steen, Gunilla 2017. Adaptive behavior in stressful situations in relation to postinfarction mortality results from prospective cohort study ‘men born in 1914’ in malmö, Sweden. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 79.
Habra, Martine E Linden, Wolfgang Anderson, Jeremy C and Weinberg, Joanne 2017. Type D personality is related to cardiovascular and neuroendocrine reactivity to acute stress. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 55, Issue. 3, p. 235.
Barger, Steven D. Bachen, Elizabeth A. Marsland, Anna L. and Manuck, Stephen B. 2017. Repressive Coping and Blood Measures of Disease Risk: Lipids and Endocrine and Immunological Responses to a Laboratory Stressor1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 30, Issue. 8, p. 1619.
De Raad, Boele 2017. Five Big, Big Five Issues. European Psychologist, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 113.
Denollet, Johan 2017. Personality and coronary heart disease: The type-D scale-16 (DS16). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 209.
Grossi, Giorgio Perski, Aleksander Feleke, Elehu and Jakobson, Ulrika 2017. State anxiety predicts poor psychosocial outcome after coronary bypass surgery. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Pignalberi, Carlo Patti, Giuseppe Chimenti, Cristina Pasceri, Vincenzo and Maseri, Attilio 2017. Role of different determinants of psychological distress in acute coronary syndromes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 613.
Denollet, Johan 2017. Personality, emotional distress and coronary heart disease. European Journal of Personality, Vol. 11, Issue. 5, p. 343.
Sanderman, Robbert and Ranchor, Adelita V. 2017. The predictor status of personality variables: etiological significance and their role in the course of disease. European Journal of Personality, Vol. 11, Issue. 5, p. 359.
Denollet, J Rombouts, H Gillebert, T.C Brutsaert, D.L Sys, S.U Brutsaert, D.L and Stroobant, N 2017. Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. The Lancet, Vol. 347, Issue. 8999, p. 417.
We used cluster analysis to delineate coping subtypes in a sample of 166 men with coronary heart disease who completed the Antwerp out-patient rehabilitation programme. These subtypes were identified on the basis of three well-defined superordinate traits that were selected from a comprehensive taxonomy: negative affectivity, social inhibition, and self-deception. Using Ward's minimum variance method and the cubic clustering criterion, we identified four coping subtypes; low-negative affectivity (N = 48), high-negative affectivity (N = 30), inhibited (N = 62), and repressive (N = 26) individuals. The accuracy of the resulting classification was demonstrated across parallel data sets and was further validated against external, health-related correlates that were not included in the clustering. The identified coping subtypes were significantly related to self-reports of subjective distress/perceived stress, ratings of Type A behaviour and anger-in, return to work, prevalence of chest-pain complaints, and use of minor tranquillizers and sleeping pills. The major findings of this study suggest that (a) male coronary patients represent a heterogeneous population with distinctly different coping subtypes, and that (b) a relatively small number of homogeneous subtypes can account for a substantial amount of variance in subjective well-being, coronary-prone behaviour, and return to work. These findings indicate that psychosomatic research should focus on how superordinate traits interact within individuals and corroborate the appropriateness of a class model to describe coping styles of male coronary patients. It is argued that discrepant findings across studies of Type-A behaviour and hostility may be related to the coping subtypes of the subject sample. Further attempts to cross-validate this classification scheme and to examine its health-related correlates are needed.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.