Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-lmg95 Total loading time: 2.281 Render date: 2021-10-18T23:51:57.749Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Disrupted salience network functional connectivity and white-matter microstructure in persons at risk for psychosis: findings from the LYRIKS study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2016

C. Wang
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
F. Ji
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Z. Hong
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
J. S. Poh
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
R. Krishnan
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
J. Lee
Affiliation:
Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
G. Rekhi
Affiliation:
Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
R. S. E. Keefe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
R. A. Adcock
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
S. J. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia
A. Fornito
Affiliation:
Monash Clinical and Imaging Neuroscience, School of Psychology and Psychiatry & Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Australia
O. Pasternak
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
M. W. L. Chee
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
J. Zhou*
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore Clinical Imaging Research Centre, the Agency for Science, Technology and Research and National University of Singapore, Singapore
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr J. Zhou, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience & Behavioral Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, #06-15, Singapore 169857, Singapore. (Email: helen.zhou@duke-nus.edu.sg)
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Salience network (SN) dysconnectivity has been hypothesized to contribute to schizophrenia. Nevertheless, little is known about the functional and structural dysconnectivity of SN in subjects at risk for psychosis. We hypothesized that SN functional and structural connectivity would be disrupted in subjects with At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) and would be associated with symptom severity and disease progression.

Method

We examined 87 ARMS and 37 healthy participants using both resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. Group differences in SN functional and structural connectivity were examined using a seed-based approach and tract-based spatial statistics. Subject-level functional connectivity measures and diffusion indices of disrupted regions were correlated with CAARMS scores and compared between ARMS with and without transition to psychosis.

Results

ARMS subjects exhibited reduced functional connectivity between the left ventral anterior insula and other SN regions. Reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) and axial diffusivity were also found along white-matter tracts in close proximity to regions of disrupted functional connectivity, including frontal-striatal-thalamic circuits and the cingulum. FA measures extracted from these disrupted white-matter regions correlated with individual symptom severity in the ARMS group. Furthermore, functional connectivity between the bilateral insula and FA at the forceps minor were further reduced in subjects who transitioned to psychosis after 2 years.

Conclusions

Our findings support the insular dysconnectivity of the proximal SN hypothesis in the early stages of psychosis. Further developed, the combined structural and functional SN assays may inform the prognosis of persons at-risk for psychosis.

Type
Original Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Introduction

Schizophrenia is increasingly viewed as a disease that involves the dysconnectivity of brain networks (Pettersson-Yeo et al. Reference Pettersson-Yeo, Allen, Benetti, McGuire and Mechelli2011; Fornito et al. Reference Fornito, Zalesky, Pantelis and Bullmore2012). Functional network architecture characterized by intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) has been widely studied in patients with schizophrenia. ICNs are defined as coherent patterns of low-frequency fluctuations in blood oxygen level-dependent signals derived from task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Greicius, Gennatas, Growdon, Jang, Rabinovici, Kramer, Weiner, Miller and Seeley2010). The salience network (SN) is one of the major ICNs and consists of the fronto-insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), orbital frontal cortex (OFC), striatum, as well as limbic structures (Seeley et al. Reference Seeley, Menon, Schatzberg, Keller, Glover, Kenna, Reiss and Greicius2007). The functional integration of nodes within the SN is crucial to sustain human emotion and cognition, especially during the detection and processing of salient information (Seeley et al. Reference Seeley, Menon, Schatzberg, Keller, Glover, Kenna, Reiss and Greicius2007; Craig, Reference Craig2009; Menon & Uddin, Reference Menon and Uddin2010). Dysfunction of the SN has been hypothesized to occur in schizophrenia, resulting in inappropriate neural responses to internal and external stimuli. These inappropriate neural responses are thought to eventually lead to positive psychotic symptoms such as hallucination and delusions (Williamson, Reference Williamson2007; Palaniyappan & Liddle, Reference Palaniyappan and Liddle2012; Palaniyappan et al. Reference Palaniyappan, Simmonite, White, Liddle and Liddle2013; Zhou & Seeley, Reference Zhou and Seeley2014).

SN-related abnormalities in schizophrenia have been consistently found in neuroimaging studies. A number of imaging studies have reported reductions in gray-matter volume (Saze et al. Reference Saze, Hirao, Namiki, Fukuyama, Hayashi and Murai2007; Fornito et al. Reference Fornito, Yucel, Patti, Wood and Pantelis2009; Takahashi et al. Reference Takahashi, Wood, Soulsby, Tanino, Wong, McGorry, Suzuki, Velakoulis and Pantelis2009) and task-related activation (Minzenberg et al. Reference Minzenberg, Laird, Thelen, Carter and Glahn2009; Wilmsmeier et al. Reference Wilmsmeier, Ohrmann, Suslow, Siegmund, Koelkebeck, Rothermundt, Kugel, Arolt, Bauer and Pedersen2010) and connectivity (Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Palaniyappan, Smieskova, Simon, Riecher-Rossler, Lang, Fusar-Poli, McGuire and Borgwardt2016) within the insula and ACC in schizophrenia. Task-free fMRI studies have demonstrated reduced functional connectivity (FC) within the insula (Liang et al. Reference Liang, Zhou, Jiang, Liu, Tian, Liu and Hao2006; Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Liang, Tian, Wang, Hao, Liu, Liu and Jiang2007), ACC (Boksman et al. Reference Boksman, Theberge, Williamson, Drost, Malla, Densmore, Takhar, Pavlosky, Menon and Neufeld2005; Honey et al. Reference Honey, Pomarol-Clotet, Corlett, Honey, McKenna, Bullmore and Fletcher2005) and other key SN regions. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been used to examine altered white-matter (WM) microstructures in schizophrenia. Reduction in DTI indices purported to quantify WM diffusion properties, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) and axial diffusivity (AD) in frontal and temporal regions (forming part of the SN) has been reported in schizophrenia (Buchsbaum et al. Reference Buchsbaum, Friedman, Buchsbaum, Chu, Hazlett, Newmark, Schneiderman, Torosjan, Tang, Hof, Stewart, Davis and Gorman2006) using voxel-based morphometry (Le Bihan, Reference Le Bihan2003) and region-of-interest (ROI; Price et al. Reference Price, Bagary, Cercignani, Altmann and Ron2005; Li et al. Reference Li, Kale Edmiston, Chen, Tang, Ouyang, Jiang, Fan, Ren, Liu, Zhou, Jiang, Liu, Xu and Wang2014) approaches as well as tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS; Lee et al. Reference Lee, Smith, Su, Honer, Macewan, Lapointe, Vertinsky, Vila-Rodriguez, Kopala and Lang2012; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Lai, Wang, Hao, Chen, Zhou, Yu and Hong2013). Furthermore, diffusion tractography studies have directly demonstrated altered structural connectivity within key SN regions in schizophrenia patients (Oh et al. Reference Oh, Kubicki, Rosenberger, Bouix, Levitt, McCarley, Westin and Shenton2009; Bracht et al. Reference Bracht, Horn, Strik, Federspiel, Razavi, Stegmayer, Wiest, Dierks, Muller and Walther2014).

Recently, there has been growing interest in the study of adolescents and young adults who are in the putative prodromal stage of schizophrenia and are experiencing subthreshold psychotic symptoms. These individuals are at high risk of transitioning to clinical psychosis over a 36-month period and are labeled as having an ‘At-Risk Mental State’ (ARMS; Yung et al. Reference Yung, McGorry, McFarlane, Jackson, Patton and Rakkar1996; Fusar-Poli et al. Reference Fusar-Poli, Bonoldi, Yung, Borgwardt, Kempton, Valmaggia, Barale, Caverzasi and McGuire2012). Several functional and structural imaging studies have attempted to examine changes in FC and diffusion in WM within ARMS subjects (Wood et al. Reference Wood, Reniers and Heinze2013); these studies have reported mixed results. Both increases and decreases in FC were found across multiple ICNs in ARMS subjects. In one seed-based task-free fMRI study, ARMS subjects showed increased FC within the default mode network (DMN; Shim et al. Reference Shim, Oh, Jung, Jang, Choi, Kim, Park, Choi, Jung and Kwon2010), while another recent study found reduced FC associated with the dorsal striatum and preserved FC in the ventral striatum (Dandash et al. Reference Dandash, Fornito, Lee, Keefe, Chee, Adcock, Pantelis, Wood and Harrison2014). DTI studies of ARMS subjects have found reduced FA in frontal regions, the anterior limb of the internal capsule, the posterior cingulate and the angular gyrus (Hoptman et al. Reference Hoptman, Nierenberg, Bertisch, Catalano, Ardekani, Branch and Delisi2008; Karlsgodt et al. Reference Karlsgodt, Niendam, Bearden and Cannon2009; Peters et al. Reference Peters, Schmitz, Dingemans, van Amelsvoort, Linszen, de Haan, Majoie and den Heeten2009; von Hohenberg et al. Reference von Hohenberg, Pasternak, Kubicki, Ballinger, Vu, Swisher, Green, Giwerc, Dahlben, Goldstein, Woo, Petryshen, Mesholam-Gately, Woodberry, Thermenos, Mulert, McCarley, Seidman and Shenton2014). Increased FA has also been reported in the ACC and the right middle and superior frontal gyri (Hoptman et al. Reference Hoptman, Nierenberg, Bertisch, Catalano, Ardekani, Branch and Delisi2008) as well as in the superior longitudinal fasciculus (Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Lenz, Smieskova, Harrisberger, Walter, Riecher-Rossler, Simon, Lang, McGuire, Fusar-Poli and Borgwardt2015). Although these inconsistent findings may reflect true heterogeneity in ARMS patients, they may also be attributed to the small sample sizes used in the aforementioned studies. Moreover, the majority of previous studies have examined ARMS patient samples in North America, Europe and Australia. There is a dearth of DTI and functional connectivity studies in East Asian populations. As culture plays an important role in defining and shaping the presentation of psychotic symptoms in patients (Laroi et al. Reference Laroi, Luhrmann, Bell, Christian, Deshpande, Fernyhough, Jenkins and Woods2014), here we aim to fill this gap by studying a group of Asian ARMS participants in Singapore. Another advantage of conducting this research in Singapore is the relatively low prevalence of drug use (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2008). Substance use is a problematic confound in ARMS research in Western countries (Habets et al. Reference Habets, Marcelis, Gronenschild, Drukker, van Os and Genetic2011; Welch et al. Reference Welch, McIntosh, Job, Whalley, Moorhead, Hall, Owens, Lawrie and Johnstone2011) and has been shown to have the potential to affect both structural and functional brain integrity (Liao et al. Reference Liao, Tang, Fornito, Liu, Chen, Chen, Xiang, Wang and Hao2012; Edward Roberts et al. Reference Edward Roberts, Curran, Friston and Morgan2014). Our recent work found no gray-matter volume reduction in substance-free ARMS subjects; this finding contrasts with results found for Western ARMS subjects with a high prevalence of drug use (Klauser et al. Reference Klauser, Zhou, Lim, Poh, Zheng, Tng, Krishnan, Lee, Keefe, Adcock, Wood, Fornito and Chee2015). Therefore, the study of ARMS subjects who have minimal exposure to substance use allows for a more precise characterization of symptom-related brain connectivity changes.

In addition to examining the structural and functional integrity of the SN in ARMS subjects, another aim of the present study is to investigate whether any of the SN abnormalities identified in ARMS subjects could be used to predict individual clinical outcomes. Several neuroimaging studies have found baseline differences between ARMS individuals who transition to psychosis (ARMS-T) and those who do not (ARMS-NT) in cortical thickness (Tognin et al. Reference Tognin, Pettersson-Yeo, Valli, Hutton, Woolley, Allen, McGuire and Mechelli2013), WM integrity (Bloemen et al. Reference Bloemen, de Koning, Schmitz, Nieman, Becker, de Haan, Dingemans, Linszen and van Amelsvoort2010; Carletti et al. Reference Carletti, Woolley, Bhattacharyya, Perez-Iglesias, Fusar Poli, Valmaggia, Broome, Bramon, Johns, Giampietro, Williams, Barker and McGuire2012) and task-related activations (Allen et al. Reference Allen, Luigjes, Howes, Egerton, Hirao, Valli, Kambeitz, Fusar-Poli, Broome and McGuire2012). These studies highlighted structural and functional changes in the prefrontal cortex, anterior insula (AI), temporal lobe and subcortical structures as potential features associated with transition. However, little is known about whether and how ICNs predict the transition to psychosis.

To this end, we tested the functional and structural SN dysconnectivity hypothesis in a relatively large East Asian sample of 96 drug-free ARMS subjects and 46 healthy controls (HCs) using both task-free fMRI and DTI approaches. We predicted that the FC and integrity of WM microstructure of SN would be reduced in ARMS individuals and that the degree of alteration would correlate with symptom severity. Within the ARMS group, we also expected that compared to ARMS-NT, the ARMS subgroup who transitioned to psychosis would have more reductions of FC and WM microstructure disruptions in the SN.

Method

Participants

We studied 96 ARMS subjects and 46 HCs (aged 14–29 years). The participants were assigned to the ARMS group if they met specific criteria based on the results of assessment with the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS; Yung et al. Reference Yung, Yuen, McGorry, Phillips, Kelly, Dell'Olio, Francey, Cosgrave, Killackey, Stanford, Godfrey and Buckby2005; Yaakub et al. Reference Yaakub, Dorairaj, Poh, Asplund, Krishnan, Lee, Keefe, Adcock, Wood and Chee2013). The study protocol for this investigation was approved by the National Healthcare Group Domain-Specific Review Board. Further details are included in the Supplementary Methods.

Participants were excluded from the study if they had a history of neurological or serious medical disorder, had a diagnosis of mental retardation, or were taking any antipsychotic medications. Participants with a current history of illicit substance use were also excluded from the study. Fifty-two of ARMS participants were taking prescription antidepressants. Age-matched HCs were recruited from the community if they had no history of neuropsychiatric disorder and no family history of psychosis in first-degree relatives.

Image acquisition

The participants underwent one neuroimaging session on a 3-T Siemens Tim Trio system (Siemens, Germany). The session included the acquisition of high-resolution T1-weighted images (TR/TE = 2300/3 ms, voxel size = 1.0  ×  1.0  ×  1.0 mm3) during a 6-min task-free fMRI scan (TR/TE = 2000/30 ms, voxel size = 3.0  ×  3.0  ×  3.0 mm3; participants were instructed to close their eyes and not fall asleep) and two runs of diffusion MRI (TR/TE = 9600/107 ms, voxel size = 2.0  ×  2.0  ×  2.0 mm3, 30 non-collinear diffusion directions with b = 1000 s/mm2, 6 volumes at b = 0 s/mm2).

FC analyses

The task-free fMRI data were preprocessed using procedures outlined in a previous study (Zuo et al. Reference Zuo, Ehmke, Mennes, Imperati, Castellanos, Sporns and Milham2012) using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL; Jenkinson et al. Reference Jenkinson, Beckmann, Behrens, Woolrich and Smith2012) and the Analysis of Functional NeuroImages software (Cox, Reference Cox1996) (see Supplementary Methods). A total of 87 of the 96 ARMS participants and 37 of the 46 HCs passed both the T1 and fMRI quality control measures.

AI is the key region in the SN underlying salience processing and introceptive awareness (Seeley et al. Reference Seeley, Menon, Schatzberg, Keller, Glover, Kenna, Reiss and Greicius2007; Uddin, Reference Uddin2015). We examined SN FC integrity using the seed-based FC approach based on AI. To account for structural and functional differences in AI subregions (Mesulam & Mufson, Reference Mesulam and Mufson1982; Mutschler et al. Reference Mutschler, Wieckhorst, Kowalevski, Derix, Wentlandt, Schulze-Bonhage and Ball2009; Wager & Barrett, Reference Wager and Barrett2004) and the lateralization of dysconnectivity reported in psychosis (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Sun, Cui, Du, Wang, Zhang, Cong, Hong and Zhang2004; Kunimatsu et al. Reference Kunimatsu, Aoki, Kunimatsu, Yoshida, Abe, Yamada, Masutani, Kasai, Yamasue, Ohtsu and Ohtomo2008), we estimated whole-brain voxel-wise FC using four AI seeds that covered the ventral and dorsal fields of the AI bilaterally; these seeds were chosen based on an independent meta-analysis of task-based fMRI studies of insular function (Kurth et al. Reference Kurth, Zilles, Fox, Laird and Eickhoff2010) (Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Fig. S1). Group differences in FC to each of the four AI seeds were examined using two-sample t tests with a height threshold of p < 0.05 and cluster threshold of p < 0.05 family-wise error (FWE) corrected.

Motion scrubbing

To further investigate if any observed group differences in FC were caused by head motion, we applied motion scrubbing on task-free fMRI data by computing frame displacement (FD) and variance of temporal derivative of time-courses over voxels (DVARS) from each subject's task-free fMRI data, following the steps outlined in a previous study (Power et al. Reference Power, Barnes, Snyder, Schlaggar and Petersen2012). We discarded fMRI volumes with FD > 0.2 mm, or DVARS > 0.3% (Power et al. Reference Power, Barnes, Snyder, Schlaggar and Petersen2013) and repeated the FC analysis with motion-scrubbed data.

WM microstructural analyses

The diffusion MRI data were preprocessed and analyzed using the TBSS pipeline (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Jenkinson, Johansen-Berg, Rueckert, Nichols, Mackay, Watkins, Ciccarelli, Cader, Matthews and Behrens2006) following our previous approach (Cortese et al. Reference Cortese, Imperati, Zhou, Proal, Klein, Mannuzza, Ramos-Olazagasti, Milham, Kelly and Castellanos2013; Hong et al. Reference Hong, Ng, Sim, Ngeow, Zheng, Lo, Chee and Zhou2015) (see Supplementary Methods). A total of 81 ARMS participants and 36 HCs passed the quality check for DTI data. A recent study indicated that early-stage schizophrenia was characterized by excessive extracellular-free water, which could result in a biased estimation of DTI metrics (Pasternak et al. Reference Pasternak, Westin, Bouix, Seidman, Goldstein, Woo, Petryshen, Mesholam-Gately, McCarley, Kikinis, Shenton and Kubicki2012). We thus implemented additional steps to derive DTI metrics after accounting for partial volume effects contributed by extracellular free water. This was achieved using a modified bi-tensor model to estimate the diffusion properties of WM tissue and surrounding free water separately (Pasternak et al. Reference Pasternak, Sochen, Gur, Intrator and Assaf2009). Group differences in the skeletonized images of the free-water corrected DTI metrics (FA, AD, mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity) were examined using non-parametric permutation tests at a threshold of p < 0.05 (threshold-free cluster enhancement corrected) (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Jenkinson, Johansen-Berg, Rueckert, Nichols, Mackay, Watkins, Ciccarelli, Cader, Matthews and Behrens2006). From the thresholded t statistic maps, the anatomical locations of significant WM clusters were identified using the JHU WM tractography atlas (Hua et al. Reference Hua, Zhang, Wakana, Jiang, Li, Reich, Calabresi, Pekar, van Zijl and Mori2008).

Correlations with clinical severity

Based on the identified regions of disrupted SN functional connectivity in ARMS subjects, we assessed the relationships between the mean FC measures in those brain ROIs and symptom severity across ARMS subjects (see  Supplementary Methods). Similarly, to evaluate the relationship between altered WM microstructure and clinical symptom severity, we extracted the subject-level mean DTI metrics from the WM clusters that showed group differences and examined their association with CAARMS scores in ARMS.

Comparisons of FC and WM microstructure in ARMS subgroups

All ARMS subjects were followed clinically for 24 months after the neuroimaging study. During the follow-up period, 10 out of 79 ARMS subjects transitioned to psychosis (eight males; mean age = 21.5 ± 3.5 years). Psychosis transition was defined according to the criteria described in CAARMS and required the presence of frank psychotic symptoms for at least 1 week (Yung et al. Reference Yung, Yuen, McGorry, Phillips, Kelly, Dell'Olio, Francey, Cosgrave, Killackey, Stanford, Godfrey and Buckby2005). Based on the identified ROIs showing group difference between ARMS and controls, we next compared the ROI-based FC and DTI metrics between ARMS-T and ARMS-NT subgroups using two-sample t tests. Age, gender, handedness and ethnicity were included as covariates in all statistical analyses.

Results

Participant characteristics

There were no differences in age, handedness, gender and motion parameters (both absolute displacement and frame displacement) between the ARMS and HC groups (p < 0.05) (Table 1, Supplementary Table S2). There was a higher proportion of ethnic Chinese individuals in the ARMS group compared to the HC group (p = 0.003). Furthermore, we found no differences in demographics nor motion parameters between ARMS-NT and ARMS-T groups, except a higher proportion of ethnic Indian individuals in the ARMS-NT group compared to the ARMS-T group (p = 0.045).

Table 1. Characteristics of individuals with At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) and healthy control participants in fMRI functional connectivity analysis

CAARMS, Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States.

t tests and χ2 tests were used to assess group differences in continuous and discrete variables, respectively. * Represents a significant difference in ethnicity composition and CAARMS scores between ARMS subjects and healthy controls (p < 0.05). The demographic information of subjects included in DTI analysis is presented in  Supplementary Table S2 (81 ARMS and 29 controls overlapped with the fMRI cohort).

Disrupted AI FC in ARMS subjects

ARMS participants had reduced FC to the left ventral anterior insula (vAI) compared to HC subjects (Fig. 1 a, Supplementary Table S3), involving several SN regions (left ACC, right posterior insula, bilateral OFC, bilateral putamen/caudate nucleus, right brainstem) and the right middle temporal gyrus (MTG). We found no regions of reduced FC to the other three seeds in ARMS subjects. These observations remain highly similar after motion scrubbing (Supplementary Fig. S2). No regions showing increased FC in the ARMS group with or without motion scrubbing.

Fig. 1. Reduced functional connectivity (FC) to the left ventral anterior insula and disrupted white-matter integrity in At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) subjects compared to healthy controls. Top row: (a) Group-level differences (ARMS < controls) in FC using seeds in the left ventral anterior insula were reported (at a height threshold of p < 0.05 and cluster threshold of p < 0.05 FWE corrected). No FC increase was found in ARMS compared to controls. Bottom row: white-matter tracts where ARMS subjects showed reduced fractional anisotropy (b) and axial diffusivity (c) compared to controls were reported (regions highlighted in blue) at p < 0.05 threshold-free cluster enhancement corrected. ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; BS, brainstem; CC, corpus callosum; CG, cingulate gyrus; CN, caudate nucleus; FM, forceps minor; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; OFC, Orbital frontal cortex; Put, putamen; UF, uncinate fasciculus; l, left; r, right.

Disrupted WM microstructure in ARMS

We found disrupted WM microstructural measures in ARMS subjects compared to controls. Specifically, ARMS subjects had reduced FA in the left cingulum, left side of the corpus callosum, left uncinate fasciculus (UF), forceps minor, left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), left superior longitudinal fasciculus, and left anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) (Fig. 1 b, Supplementary Table S4). Similarly, reduced AD of ARMS was primarily found along the anterior to posterior axis of the bilateral cingulum/corpus callosum (Fig. 1 c, Supplementary Table S4). WM regions that showed microstructural abnormalities in ARMS were close to those gray-matter regions that displayed reduced FC to the left vAI (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Structural dysconnectivity in At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) is closely linked to salience network functional connectivity reductions. Compared to healthy controls, ARMS participants had reduced fractional anisotropy in white-matter tracts (highlighted in blue), which were close to those brain regions (highlighted in orange) showing reduced salience network functional connectivity to the left ventral anterior insula in ARMS. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CC, corpus callosum; CG, cingulate gyrus; FM, forceps minor; OFC, orbital frontal cortex; l, left; r, right.

Conversely, no increase in FA or AD was found in ARMS subjects compared to HCs. Additionally, we found no differences in mean diffusivity and radial diffusivity between ARMS and HC subjects.

Correlation between WM microstructure and symptom severity

Symptom severity, as measured by CAARMS total severity score, was correlated with decreased FA within the left IFOF (r = −0.355, p < 0.05 FWE corrected), the left UF (r = −0.311, p < 0.05 FWE corrected) and the left ATR (r = −0.297, p < 0.05 FWE corrected) in ARMS subjects (Fig. 3). We found no association between CAARMS total severity scores and the FC of SN regions that showed disrupted SN connectivity in ARMS.

Fig. 3. White-matter integrity disruption correlates with symptom severity. Clinical severity evaluated by Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) was negatively correlated with fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the white-matter regions with group difference (Fig. 2) (p < 0.05 FWE corrected). FA values in scatter plots are standardized residuals after controlling for age, gender, handedness and ethnicity. ATR, Anterior thalamic radiation; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; UF, uncinated fasciculus.

Difference in functional and structural disruptions between ARMS-T and ARMS-NT

Among the brain regions that showed reduced FC in ARMS subjects compared to HCs, we found that FC between the left vAI and the right insula was further reduced in ARMS-T subjects compared to ARMS-NT subjects (t = −3.413, p < 0.05 FWE corrected) (Fig. 4, left). Similarly, among the WM regions that showed ARMS-associated FA reductions, the FA of the forceps minor was more reduced in ARMS-T subjects compared to ARMS-NT subjects (t = −2.977, p < 0.05 FWE corrected) (Fig. 4, right). In contrast, we found no group difference in CAARMS total severity between ARMS-T and ARMS-NT (p < 0.05 corrected).

Fig. 4. Functional and structural dysconnectivity predicted psychotic conversion in At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) subjects. Bar charts showing FC between left vAI and right insula as well as FA in the forceps minor of healthy controls (HC), ARMS subjects who transitioned to psychosis (ARMS-T) and ARMS subject who did not make the transition (ARMS-NT). FC or FA values were standardized residuals after controlling for age, gender, handedness and ethnicity. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The significance of pairwise group differences is indicated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. The comparisons between HC and ARMS-T are significant at p < 0.001 for both plots (not marked). All passed the multiple comparison correction (p < 0.05), except the contrast between HC and ARMS-NT for FC. FA, Fractional anisotropy; FC, functional connectivity; vAI, ventral anterior insula.

Co-morbid depression, anxiety disorder and antidepressant medication

To investigate the FC and WM microstructural differences that could be related to anxio-depressive disorders and antidepressant usage, we further compared FC and WM FA values in disrupted regions between ARMS subjects who had a concomitant diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety (N = 52) and ARMS subjects who did not (N = 35). We found no significant differences between the two groups. A similar comparison between ARMS individuals who were taking antidepressants and those who were not also did not reveal any significant differences.

Discussion

Although there is evidence for the SN dysconnectivity hypothesis in schizophrenia, whether the hypothesis extends to at-risk subjects remains unclear. We used both task-free fMRI and DTI to test the SN dysconnectivity hypothesis in a large sample of 96 substance-free ARMS subjects. Relative to age-matched HCs, ARMS subjects showed reduced FC between the left vAI and several SN regions. The ARMS group also showed reduced FA and AD in fronto-striatal-thalamic circuits close to the regions that showed reduced FC. Furthermore, the disruptions in WM microstructure related to the severity of attenuated psychotic symptoms in ARMS subjects. These SN disruptions and the related WM microstructure alternations also predicted transition to psychosis. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis of network-level disruptions of the salience system in ARMS participants.

Reduced vAI FC in ARMS

In the ARMS group, key SN regions, including the right insula, left ACC, bilateral OFC, bilateral striatum, and brainstem, were found to exhibit reduced intrinsic FC with the vAI. These findings are in agreement with previous task-free fMRI studies reporting SN intrinsic connectivity disruptions in schizophrenia (Fusar-Poli, Reference Fusar-Poli2012; Tu et al. Reference Tu, Hsieh, Li, Bai and Su2012; Mamah et al. Reference Mamah, Barch and Repovs2013; Wood et al. Reference Wood, Reniers and Heinze2013). Because the AI performs a wide range of neurocognitive functions and is functionally differentiated (Wager & Barrett, Reference Wager and Barrett2004; Mutschler et al. Reference Mutschler, Wieckhorst, Kowalevski, Derix, Wentlandt, Schulze-Bonhage and Ball2009), it is not surprising that AI subfields did not contribute equally to SN dysconnectivity in ARMS. Our findings highlighted the left vAI as the focal point of network disruptions in pre-clinical psychosis. The vAI has been shown to be involved in the regulation of emotionally related physiological states and to serve as an intermediary for functional associations between other insular regions and the limbic system (Krolak-Salmon et al. Reference Krolak-Salmon, Henaff, Isnard, Tallon-Baudry, Guenot, Vighetto, Bertrand and Mauguiere2003; Mutschler et al. Reference Mutschler, Wieckhorst, Kowalevski, Derix, Wentlandt, Schulze-Bonhage and Ball2009). This could explain our finding that most of the FC disruptions involving the left vAI also involved regions that are closely associated with the limbic system, including the ACC, bilateral insula, and striatum regions.

Emerging evidence demonstrated dysconnectivity between SN and other ICNs in patients with schizophrenia (Jafri et al. Reference Jafri, Pearlson, Stevens and Calhoun2008; Mamah et al. Reference Mamah, Barch and Repovs2013; Palaniyappan et al. Reference Palaniyappan, Simmonite, White, Liddle and Liddle2013; Wotruba et al. Reference Wotruba, Michels, Buechler, Metzler, Theodoridou, Gerstenberg, Walitza, Kollias, Rossler and Heekeren2014) and reduced long-range FC in early onset schizophrenia (Yang et al. Reference Yang, Xu, Xu, Hoy, Handwerker, Chen, Northoff, Zuo and Bandettini2014; Jiang et al. Reference Jiang, Xu, Zhu, Yang, Li and Zuo2015; Li et al. Reference Li, Xu, Zhang, Hoptman and Zuo2015). We found reduced FC between left vAI and right MTG, usually considered to be part of the DMN (Greicius et al. Reference Greicius, Srivastava, Reiss and Menon2004; Fox et al. Reference Fox, Snyder, Vincent, Corbetta, Van Essen and Raichle2005), in the ARMS group. The impaired interactions between specific regions of SN and DMN may be reduced in ARMS participants, which suggest that persons at-risk for psychosis might have difficulty coordinating between externally guided and internally monitored states, leading to subthreshold psychotic symptoms (Menon & Uddin, Reference Menon and Uddin2010; Zhou & Seeley, Reference Zhou and Seeley2014).

Disrupted WM microstructure in fronto-striatal-thalamic circuits correlated with symptom severity in ARMS

Reduced FA along major WM tracts connecting the thalamus, basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex was observed in ARMS subjects, indicating the disruption of WM microstructure in fronto-striatal-thalamic circuits. Importantly, we found an association between WM microstructure (i.e. FA measures in the left ATR, left IFOF and left UF) and psychotic symptom severity, as measured by the CAARMS. This type of WM microstructure disruption has been reported from first-episode psychosis (Federspiel et al. Reference Federspiel, Begre, Kiefer, Schroth, Strik and Dierks2006; Perez-Iglesias et al. Reference Perez-Iglesias, Tordesillas-Gutierrez, Barker, McGuire, Roiz-Santianez, Mata, de Lucas, Quintana, Vazquez-Barquero and Crespo-Facorro2010) to chronic illness (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Lai, Wang, Hao, Chen, Zhou, Yu and Hong2013, Reference Liu, Lai, Wang, Hao, Chen, Zhou, Yu and Hong2014; Oh et al. Reference Oh, Kubicki, Rosenberger, Bouix, Levitt, McCarley, Westin and Shenton2009); however, few studies have been conducted among ARMS subjects (Wood et al. Reference Wood, Reniers and Heinze2013). Fronto-striatal-thalamic circuits include important neural pathways, such as the ATR and fronto-striatal circuits. The latter circuits are involved in executive and other higher cognitive domains (Van der Werf et al. Reference Van der Werf, Jolles, Witter and Uylings2003; Chudasama & Robbins, Reference Chudasama and Robbins2006). Disruptions of the ATR have been associated with cognitive abnormalities and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia (Mamah et al. Reference Mamah, Conturo, Harms, Akbudak, Wang, McMichael, Gado, Barch and Csernansky2010). One task-related PET imaging study suggested a link between dysfunction in fronto-striatal systems and prodromal signs of psychosis, especially related to executive functions (Fusar-Poli et al. Reference Fusar-Poli, Howes, Allen, Broome, Valli, Asselin, Grasby and McGuire2010). Early fronto-striatal circuit dysfunction such as that observed here could thus contribute to cognitive impairment and reduced social functioning (Fornito et al. Reference Fornito, Harrison, Goodby, Dean, Ooi, Nathan, Lennox, Jones, Suckling and Bullmore2013; Dandash et al. Reference Dandash, Fornito, Lee, Keefe, Chee, Adcock, Pantelis, Wood and Harrison2014). Notably, we observed a clear trend towards greater WM disruption in the left hemisphere in ARMS. Indeed, a few studies have reported reduced FA leftward asymmetry along the anterior cingulum and UF in schizophrenia patients (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Sun, Cui, Du, Wang, Zhang, Cong, Hong and Zhang2004; Kubicki et al. Reference Kubicki, McCarley, Westin, Park, Maier, Kikinis, Jolesz and Shenton2007; Kunimatsu et al. Reference Kunimatsu, Aoki, Kunimatsu, Yoshida, Abe, Yamada, Masutani, Kasai, Yamasue, Ohtsu and Ohtomo2008). The current findings suggest a left hemisphere-dominated WM disruption pattern in early stages of psychosis. Whether and how such pattern contributes to changes in WM cerebral asymmetry requires further validation (Oertel-Knochel & Linden, Reference Oertel-Knochel and Linden2011).

Reduced AD was primarily observed in localized regions of the cingulum, corpus callosum and ATR. Disruptions in the cingulum were previously associated with inefficient cognitive functioning in schizophrenia (Perez-Iglesias et al. Reference Perez-Iglesias, Tordesillas-Gutierrez, Barker, McGuire, Roiz-Santianez, Mata, de Lucas, Quintana, Vazquez-Barquero and Crespo-Facorro2010; Tang et al. Reference Tang, Liao, Zhou, Tan, Liu, Hao, Hu and Chen2010). The cingulum is critical for efficient information processing, as it links three key brain networks (Kelly et al. Reference Kelly, Uddin, Biswal, Castellanos and Milham2008; Leech et al. Reference Leech, Kamourieh, Beckmann and Sharp2011). The cingulum connects frontal regions (including SN) and posterior DMN regions (i.e. the posterior cingulate cortex), and the hippocampal portion of the cingulum projects from the posterior cingulate cortex to the limbic system (i.e. hippocampus).

The concordance between disrupted FC in the SN and WM microstructure in ARMS subjects strengthens the case for aberrant SN connectivity. Using TBSS analysis, we identified altered diffusion properties along major WM tracts, which provide critical structural support to SN function. Specifically, reduced FA and AD were evident along the left ATR, forceps minor and corpus callosum. These WM tracts project into SN regions showing reduced FC in prefrontal cortex, cingulate gyrus and striatum. Although the TBSS analysis did not directly measure the strength of structural connectivity between these regions, it evaluated the diffusion properties specifically along major WM tracts in the brain, closely approximating the integrity of structural foundation supporting FC between distant brain regions (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Jenkinson, Johansen-Berg, Rueckert, Nichols, Mackay, Watkins, Ciccarelli, Cader, Matthews and Behrens2006). Thus using two different neuroimaging modalities, our findings showed converging evidences supporting the SN dysconnectivity hypothesis in ARMS subjects.

FC and WM microstructure in ARMS subjects predicted clinical progression

Based on these converging functional and structural alternations in a high-risk group, an important question is whether we could use these assays to predict individual's transition to psychosis. Here, we found specific ARMS-associated changes (i.e. FC between bilateral insula and FA of forceps minor changes at baseline) that associated with subsequent psychotic conversion. Notably, the forceps minor is a WM tract that connects the lateral and medial part of the frontal lobes bilaterally; thus could be the structural mechanism that explain the reduced functional synchrony between SN regions in the left and right hemisphere. To date, a number of studies have provided evidence that dysfunction in task-related networks (Sabb et al. Reference Sabb, van Erp, Hardt, Dapretto, Caplan, Cannon and Bearden2010; Allen et al. Reference Allen, Luigjes, Howes, Egerton, Hirao, Valli, Kambeitz, Fusar-Poli, Broome and McGuire2012) as well as whole-brain voxel-wise WM changes (Bloemen et al. Reference Bloemen, de Koning, Schmitz, Nieman, Becker, de Haan, Dingemans, Linszen and van Amelsvoort2010; Carletti et al. Reference Carletti, Woolley, Bhattacharyya, Perez-Iglesias, Fusar Poli, Valmaggia, Broome, Bramon, Johns, Giampietro, Williams, Barker and McGuire2012) may foreshadow the onset of psychosis, but few have examined the changes in ICNs or network-based WM microstructures. Our findings extended these studies by demonstrating the involvement of brain networks in task-free conditions and corresponding changes in WM tracts. Since task-free fMRI could be more readily implemented in clinical settings than task-related studies, our work demonstrates that specific neuroimaging features could potentially lead to the development of clinical biomarkers that identify ARMS subgroups with increased risk of progressing into frank psychosis (McGuire et al. Reference McGuire, Sato, Mechelli, Jackowski, Bressan and Zugman2015).

Limitations and future directions

The present study had several limitations. First, although TBSS partially overcomes the misalignment of FA images in WM voxel-based analysis (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Jenkinson, Johansen-Berg, Rueckert, Nichols, Mackay, Watkins, Ciccarelli, Cader, Matthews and Behrens2006), WM fibers at the boundary of gray matter and WM, or deep in gray-matter regions, could be omitted from consideration. In addition, TBSS uses group-averaged WM skeleton as the proxy of major WM tracts. Future works involving high-resolution diffusion imaging and WM tractography may help to examine the direct correspondence between FC and structural connectivity as well as minimize errors due to the inter-individual differences in WM structure. Moreover, the test–retest reliability of fMRI and DTI studies should be considered when interpreting our findings. While we have demonstrated ARMS-specific functional and structural dysconnectivity, good reproducibility is the prerequisite for successfully replicating these findings and transforming them into clinical biomarkers. A multisite test–retest study reported good reproducibility of diffusion metrics derived using TBSS (Jovicich et al. Reference Jovicich, Marizzoni, Bosch, Bartres-Faz, Arnold, Benninghoff, Wiltfang, Roccatagliata, Picco, Nobili, Blin, Bombois, Lopes, Bordet, Chanoine, Ranjeva, Didic, Gros-Dagnac, Payoux, Zoccatelli, Alessandrini, Beltramello, Bargallo, Ferretti, Caulo, Aiello, Ragucci, Soricelli, Salvadori, Tarducci, Floridi, Tsolaki, Constantinidis, Drevelegas, Rossini, Marra, Otto, Reiss-Zimmermann, Hoffmann, Galluzzi and Frisoni2014). Similarly, (Song et al. Reference Song, Desphande, Meier, Tudorascu, Vergun, Nair, Biswal, Meyerand, Birn, Bellec and Prabhakaran2012) used seed-based correlation method and found reliable and stable FC estimations in the group of young participants (mean ICC = 0.4). However, intra- and inter-individual test–retest variability do exist in task-free fMRI analysis and might be contributed to by endogenous neural dynamics and various non-neural factors such as head motion and scanner noise (Zuo & Xing, Reference Zuo and Xing2014). In summary, based on a substance-free ARMS sample, we provide converging evidence, from both structural and functional connectivity analyses, to support the SN dysconnectivity hypothesis in individuals at risk for psychosis. The extent of SN disruption correlated with psychotic symptom severity and was more pronounced in subjects that developed psychosis, which can be utilized for prediction of psychosis transition.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001410.

Acknowledgements

The Singapore Translational and Clinical Research in Psychosis is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under the National Medical Research Council Translational and Clinical Research Flagship Program (grant no.: NMRC/TCR/003/2008). This research was supported by Biomedical Research Council (13/1/96/19/687), National Medical Research Council, Singapore (CIRG/1416/2015, CBRG/0088/2015), and Duke-NUS Medical School Signature Research Program funded by Ministry of Health, Singapore, by NIH grants (R01MH074794, P41EB015902, R01AG042512, R01MH102377) and by a NARSAD young investigator award.

Declaration of Interest

None.

References

Allen, P, Luigjes, J, Howes, OD, Egerton, A, Hirao, K, Valli, I, Kambeitz, J, Fusar-Poli, P, Broome, M, McGuire, P (2012). Transition to psychosis associated with prefrontal and subcortical dysfunction in ultra high-risk individuals. Schizophrenia Bulletin 38, 12681276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloemen, OJ, de Koning, MB, Schmitz, N, Nieman, DH, Becker, HE, de Haan, L, Dingemans, P, Linszen, DH, van Amelsvoort, TA (2010). White-matter markers for psychosis in a prospective ultra-high-risk cohort. Psychological Medicine 40, 12971304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boksman, K, Theberge, J, Williamson, P, Drost, DJ, Malla, A, Densmore, M, Takhar, J, Pavlosky, W, Menon, RS, Neufeld, RW (2005). A 4.0-T fMRI study of brain connectivity during word fluency in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 75, 247263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bracht, T, Horn, H, Strik, W, Federspiel, A, Razavi, N, Stegmayer, K, Wiest, R, Dierks, T, Muller, TJ, Walther, S (2014). White matter pathway organization of the reward system is related to positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 153, 136142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchsbaum, MS, Friedman, J, Buchsbaum, BR, Chu, KW, Hazlett, EA, Newmark, R, Schneiderman, JS, Torosjan, Y, Tang, C, Hof, PR, Stewart, D, Davis, KL, Gorman, J (2006). Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 60, 11811187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carletti, F, Woolley, JB, Bhattacharyya, S, Perez-Iglesias, R, Fusar Poli, P, Valmaggia, L, Broome, MR, Bramon, E, Johns, L, Giampietro, V, Williams, SC, Barker, GJ, McGuire, PK (2012). Alterations in white matter evident before the onset of psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 38, 11701179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudasama, Y, Robbins, TW (2006). Functions of frontostriatal systems in cognition: comparative neuropsychopharmacological studies in rats, monkeys and humans. Biological Psychology 73, 1938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortese, S, Imperati, D, Zhou, J, Proal, E, Klein, RG, Mannuzza, S, Ramos-Olazagasti, MA, Milham, MP, Kelly, C, Castellanos, FX (2013). White matter alterations at 33-year follow-up in adults with childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry 74, 591598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, RW (1996). AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research 29, 162173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, AD (2009). How do you feel – now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10, 5970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dandash, O, Fornito, A, Lee, J, Keefe, RS, Chee, MW, Adcock, RA, Pantelis, C, Wood, SJ, Harrison, BJ (2014). Altered striatal functional connectivity in subjects with an at-risk mental state for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40, 904913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edward Roberts, R, Curran, HV, Friston, KJ, Morgan, CJ (2014). Abnormalities in white matter microstructure associated with chronic ketamine use. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 329338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federspiel, A, Begre, S, Kiefer, C, Schroth, G, Strik, WK, Dierks, T (2006). Alterations of white matter connectivity in first episode schizophrenia. Neurobiology of Disease 22, 702709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornito, A, Harrison, BJ, Goodby, E, Dean, A, Ooi, C, Nathan, PJ, Lennox, BR, Jones, PB, Suckling, J, Bullmore, ET (2013). Functional dysconnectivity of corticostriatal circuitry as a risk phenotype for psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 11431151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornito, A, Yucel, M, Patti, J, Wood, SJ, Pantelis, C (2009). Mapping grey matter reductions in schizophrenia: an anatomical likelihood estimation analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Schizophrenia Research 108, 104113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornito, A, Zalesky, A, Pantelis, C, Bullmore, ET (2012). Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics. NeuroImage 62, 22962314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, MD, Snyder, AZ, Vincent, JL, Corbetta, M, Van Essen, DC, Raichle, ME (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 96739678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusar-Poli, P (2012). Voxel-wise meta-analysis of fMRI studies in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 37, 106112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusar-Poli, P, Bonoldi, I, Yung, AR, Borgwardt, S, Kempton, MJ, Valmaggia, L, Barale, F, Caverzasi, E, McGuire, P (2012). Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Archives of General Psychiatry 69, 220229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusar-Poli, P, Howes, OD, Allen, P, Broome, M, Valli, I, Asselin, MC, Grasby, PM, McGuire, PK (2010). Abnormal frontostriatal interactions in people with prodromal signs of psychosis: a multimodal imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry 67, 683691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greicius, MD, Srivastava, G, Reiss, AL, Menon, V (2004). Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101, 46374642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habets, P, Marcelis, M, Gronenschild, E, Drukker, M, van Os, J, Genetic, R, Outcome of P (2011). Reduced cortical thickness as an outcome of differential sensitivity to environmental risks in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 69, 487494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honey, GD, Pomarol-Clotet, E, Corlett, PR, Honey, RA, McKenna, PJ, Bullmore, ET, Fletcher, PC (2005). Functional dysconnectivity in schizophrenia associated with attentional modulation of motor function. Brain 128, 25972611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, Z, Ng, KK, Sim, SK, Ngeow, MY, Zheng, H, Lo, JC, Chee, MW, Zhou, J (2015). Differential age-dependent associations of gray matter volume and white matter integrity with processing speed in healthy older adults. NeuroImage 123, 4250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoptman, MJ, Nierenberg, J, Bertisch, HC, Catalano, D, Ardekani, BA, Branch, CA, Delisi, LE (2008). A DTI study of white matter microstructure in individuals at high genetic risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 106, 115124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, K, Zhang, J, Wakana, S, Jiang, H, Li, X, Reich, DS, Calabresi, PA, Pekar, JJ, van Zijl, PC, Mori, S (2008). Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. NeuroImage 39, 336347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jafri, MJ, Pearlson, GD, Stevens, M, Calhoun, VD (2008). A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia. NeuroImage 39, 16661681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, M, Beckmann, CF, Behrens, TE, Woolrich, MW, Smith, SM (2012). Fsl. NeuroImage 62, 782790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, L, Xu, Y, Zhu, XT, Yang, Z, Li, HJ, Zuo, XN (2015). Local-to-remote cortical connectivity in early- and adulthood-onset schizophrenia. Translational Psychiatry 5, e566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jovicich, J, Marizzoni, M, Bosch, B, Bartres-Faz, D, Arnold, J, Benninghoff, J, Wiltfang, J, Roccatagliata, L, Picco, A, Nobili, F, Blin, O, Bombois, S, Lopes, R, Bordet, R, Chanoine, V, Ranjeva, JP, Didic, M, Gros-Dagnac, H, Payoux, P, Zoccatelli, G, Alessandrini, F, Beltramello, A, Bargallo, N, Ferretti, A, Caulo, M, Aiello, M, Ragucci, M, Soricelli, A, Salvadori, N, Tarducci, R, Floridi, P, Tsolaki, M, Constantinidis, M, Drevelegas, A, Rossini, PM, Marra, C, Otto, J, Reiss-Zimmermann, M, Hoffmann, KT, Galluzzi, S, Frisoni, GB (2014). Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects. NeuroImage 101, 390403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsgodt, KH, Niendam, TA, Bearden, CE, Cannon, TD (2009). White matter integrity and prediction of social and role functioning in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Biological Psychiatry 66, 562569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, AM, Uddin, LQ, Biswal, BB, Castellanos, FX, Milham, MP (2008). Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. NeuroImage 39, 527537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauser, P, Zhou, J, Lim, JK, Poh, JS, Zheng, H, Tng, HY, Krishnan, R, Lee, J, Keefe, RS, Adcock, RA, Wood, SJ, Fornito, A, Chee, MW (2015). Lack of evidence for regional brain volume or cortical thickness abnormalities in youths at clinical high risk for psychosis: findings from the longitudinal youth at risk study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, 12851293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krolak-Salmon, P, Henaff, MA, Isnard, J, Tallon-Baudry, C, Guenot, M, Vighetto, A, Bertrand, O, Mauguiere, F (2003). An attention modulated response to disgust in human ventral anterior insula. Annals of Neurology 53, 446453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubicki, M, McCarley, R, Westin, CF, Park, HJ, Maier, S, Kikinis, R, Jolesz, FA, Shenton, ME (2007). A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research 41, 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunimatsu, N, Aoki, S, Kunimatsu, A, Yoshida, M, Abe, O, Yamada, H, Masutani, Y, Kasai, K, Yamasue, H, Ohtsu, H, Ohtomo, K (2008). Tract-specific analysis of the superior occipitofrontal fasciculus in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 164, 198205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurth, F, Zilles, K, Fox, PT, Laird, AR, Eickhoff, SB (2010). A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function 214, 519534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laroi, F, Luhrmann, TM, Bell, V, Christian, WA Jr, Deshpande, S, Fernyhough, C, Jenkins, J, Woods, A (2014). Culture and hallucinations: overview and future directions. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40 (Suppl. 4), S213S220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bihan, D (2003). Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4, 469480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, DY, Smith, GN, Su, W, Honer, WG, Macewan, GW, Lapointe, JS, Vertinsky, AT, Vila-Rodriguez, F, Kopala, LC, Lang, DJ (2012). White matter tract abnormalities in first-episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 141, 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leech, R, Kamourieh, S, Beckmann, CF, Sharp, DJ (2011). Fractionating the default mode network: distinct contributions of the ventral and dorsal posterior cingulate cortex to cognitive control. Journal of Neuroscience 31, 32173224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, HJ, Xu, Y, Zhang, KR, Hoptman, MJ, Zuo, XN (2015). Homotopic connectivity in drug-naive, first-episode, early-onset schizophrenia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 56, 432443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Kale Edmiston, E, Chen, K, Tang, Y, Ouyang, X, Jiang, Y, Fan, G, Ren, L, Liu, J, Zhou, Y, Jiang, W, Liu, Z, Xu, K, Wang, F (2014). A comparative diffusion tensor imaging study of corpus callosum subregion integrity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 221, 5862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, M, Zhou, Y, Jiang, T, Liu, Z, Tian, L, Liu, H, Hao, Y (2006). Widespread functional disconnectivity in schizophrenia with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport 17, 209213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, Y, Tang, J, Fornito, A, Liu, T, Chen, X, Chen, H, Xiang, X, Wang, X, Hao, W (2012). Alterations in regional homogeneity of resting-state brain activity in ketamine addicts. Neuroscience Letters 522, 3640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X, Lai, Y, Wang, X, Hao, C, Chen, L, Zhou, Z, Yu, X, Hong, N (2013). Reduced white matter integrity and cognitive deficit in never-medicated chronic schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor study using TBSS. Behavioural Brain Research 252, 157163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X, Lai, Y, Wang, X, Hao, C, Chen, L, Zhou, Z, Yu, X, Hong, N (2014). A combined DTI and structural MRI study in medicated-naive chronic schizophrenia. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 32, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamah, D, Barch, DM, Repovs, G (2013). Resting state functional connectivity of five neural networks in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Journal of Affective Disorders 150, 601609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamah, D, Conturo, TE, Harms, MP, Akbudak, E, Wang, L, McMichael, AR, Gado, MH, Barch, DM, Csernansky, JG (2010). Anterior thalamic radiation integrity in schizophrenia: a diffusion-tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Research 183, 144150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, P, Sato, JR, Mechelli, A, Jackowski, A, Bressan, RA, Zugman, A (2015). Can neuroimaging be used to predict the onset of psychosis? Lancet Psychiatry 2, 11171122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, V, Uddin, LQ (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function 214, 655667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesulam, MM, Mufson, EJ (1982). Insula of the old world monkey. I. Architectonics in the insulo-orbito-temporal component of the paralimbic brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology 212, 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minzenberg, MJ, Laird, AR, Thelen, S, Carter, CS, Glahn, DC (2009). Meta-analysis of 41 functional neuroimaging studies of executive function in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 66, 811822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutschler, I, Wieckhorst, B, Kowalevski, S, Derix, J, Wentlandt, J, Schulze-Bonhage, A, Ball, T (2009). Functional organization of the human anterior insular cortex. Neuroscience Letters 457, 6670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oertel-Knochel, V, Linden, DE (2011). Cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia. Neuroscientist 17, 456467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, JS, Kubicki, M, Rosenberger, G, Bouix, S, Levitt, JJ, McCarley, RW, Westin, CF, Shenton, ME (2009). Thalamo-frontal white matter alterations in chronic schizophrenia: a quantitative diffusion tractography study. Human Brain Mapping 30, 38123825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palaniyappan, L, Liddle, PF (2012). Does the salience network play a cardinal role in psychosis? An emerging hypothesis of insular dysfunction. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 37, 1727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palaniyappan, L, Simmonite, M, White, TP, Liddle, EB, Liddle, PF (2013). Neural primacy of the salience processing system in schizophrenia. Neuron 79, 814828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, O, Sochen, N, Gur, Y, Intrator, N, Assaf, Y (2009). Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 62, 717730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasternak, O, Westin, CF, Bouix, S, Seidman, LJ, Goldstein, JM, Woo, TU, Petryshen, TL, Mesholam-Gately, RI, McCarley, RW, Kikinis, R, Shenton, ME, Kubicki, M (2012). Excessive extracellular volume reveals a neurodegenerative pattern in schizophrenia onset. Journal of Neuroscience 32, 1736517372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Iglesias, R, Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D, Barker, GJ, McGuire, PK, Roiz-Santianez, R, Mata, I, de Lucas, EM, Quintana, F, Vazquez-Barquero, JL, Crespo-Facorro, B (2010). White matter defects in first episode psychosis patients: a voxelwise analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage 49, 199204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, BD, Schmitz, N, Dingemans, PM, van Amelsvoort, TA, Linszen, DH, de Haan, L, Majoie, CB, den Heeten, GJ (2009). Preliminary evidence for reduced frontal white matter integrity in subjects at ultra-high-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 111, 192193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson-Yeo, W, Allen, P, Benetti, S, McGuire, P, Mechelli, A (2011). Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: where are we now? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35, 11101124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, JD, Barnes, KA, Snyder, AZ, Schlaggar, BL, Petersen, SE (2012). Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage 59, 21422154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, JD, Barnes, KA, Snyder, AZ, Schlaggar, BL, Petersen, SE (2013). Steps toward optimizing motion artifact removal in functional connectivity MRI; a reply to Carp. NeuroImage 76, 439441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, G, Bagary, MS, Cercignani, M, Altmann, DR, Ron, MA (2005). The corpus callosum in first episode schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 76, 585587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabb, FW, van Erp, TG, Hardt, ME, Dapretto, M, Caplan, R, Cannon, TD, Bearden, CE (2010). Language network dysfunction as a predictor of outcome in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 116, 173183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saze, T, Hirao, K, Namiki, C, Fukuyama, H, Hayashi, T, Murai, T (2007). Insular volume reduction in schizophrenia. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 257, 473479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A, Lenz, C, Smieskova, R, Harrisberger, F, Walter, A, Riecher-Rossler, A, Simon, A, Lang, UE, McGuire, P, Fusar-Poli, P, Borgwardt, SJ (2015). Brain diffusion changes in emerging psychosis and the impact of state-dependent psychopathology. Neuro-Signals 23, 7183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, A, Palaniyappan, L, Smieskova, R, Simon, A, Riecher-Rossler, A, Lang, UE, Fusar-Poli, P, McGuire, P, Borgwardt, SJ (2016). Dysfunctional insular connectivity during reward prediction in patients with first-episode psychosis. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 41, 150234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeley, WW, Menon, V, Schatzberg, AF, Keller, J, Glover, GH, Kenna, H, Reiss, AL, Greicius, MD (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 23492356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shim, G, Oh, JS, Jung, WH, Jang, JH, Choi, CH, Kim, E, Park, HY, Choi, JS, Jung, MH, Kwon, JS (2010). Altered resting-state connectivity in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: an fMRI study. Behavioral and Brain Functions 6, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, SM, Jenkinson, M, Johansen-Berg, H, Rueckert, D, Nichols, TE, Mackay, CE, Watkins, KE, Ciccarelli, O, Cader, MZ, Matthews, PM, Behrens, TE (2006). Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage 31, 14871505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, J, Desphande, AS, Meier, TB, Tudorascu, DL, Vergun, S, Nair, VA, Biswal, BB, Meyerand, ME, Birn, RM, Bellec, P, Prabhakaran, V (2012). Age-related differences in test-retest reliability in resting-state brain functional connectivity. PLoS ONE 7, e49847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, T, Wood, SJ, Soulsby, B, Tanino, R, Wong, MT, McGorry, PD, Suzuki, M, Velakoulis, D, Pantelis, C (2009). Diagnostic specificity of the insular cortex abnormalities in first-episode psychotic disorders. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 33, 651657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, J, Liao, Y, Zhou, B, Tan, C, Liu, T, Hao, W, Hu, D, Chen, X (2010). Abnormal anterior cingulum integrity in first episode, early-onset schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain Research 1343, 199205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tognin, S, Pettersson-Yeo, W, Valli, I, Hutton, C, Woolley, J, Allen, P, McGuire, P, Mechelli, A (2013). Using structural neuroimaging to make quantitative predictions of symptom progression in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Front Psychiatry 4, 187.Google ScholarPubMed
Tu, PC, Hsieh, JC, Li, CT, Bai, YM, Su, TP (2012). Cortico-striatal disconnection within the cingulo-opercular network in schizophrenia revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity analysis: a resting fMRI study. NeuroImage 59, 238247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uddin, LQ (2015). Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16, 5561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2008). World drug report 2008. United Nations Publication 1, 273280.Google Scholar
Van der Werf, YD, Jolles, J, Witter, MP, Uylings, HB (2003). Contributions of thalamic nuclei to declarative memory functioning. Cortex 39, 10471062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hohenberg, CC, Pasternak, O, Kubicki, M, Ballinger, T, Vu, MA, Swisher, T, Green, K, Giwerc, M, Dahlben, B, Goldstein, JM, Woo, TU, Petryshen, TL, Mesholam-Gately, RI, Woodberry, KA, Thermenos, HW, Mulert, C, McCarley, RW, Seidman, LJ, Shenton, ME (2014). White matter microstructure in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: a whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40, 895903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wager, TD, Barrett, LF (2004). From affect to control: functional specialization of the insula in motivation and regulation. Published online at PsycExtra (http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycextra).Google Scholar
Wang, F, Sun, Z, Cui, L, Du, X, Wang, X, Zhang, H, Cong, Z, Hong, N, Zhang, D (2004). Anterior cingulum abnormalities in male patients with schizophrenia determined through diffusion tensor imaging. American Journal of Psychiatry 161, 573575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, KA, McIntosh, AM, Job, DE, Whalley, HC, Moorhead, TW, Hall, J, Owens, DG, Lawrie, SM, Johnstone, EC (2011). The impact of substance use on brain structure in people at high risk of developing schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 37, 10661076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, P (2007). Are anticorrelated networks in the brain relevant to schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Bulletin 33, 9941003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmsmeier, A, Ohrmann, P, Suslow, T, Siegmund, A, Koelkebeck, K, Rothermundt, M, Kugel, H, Arolt, V, Bauer, J, Pedersen, A (2010). Neural correlates of set-shifting: decomposing executive functions in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 35, 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, SJ, Reniers, RL, Heinze, K (2013). Neuroimaging findings in the at-risk mental state: a review of recent literature. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 58, 1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wotruba, D, Michels, L, Buechler, R, Metzler, S, Theodoridou, A, Gerstenberg, M, Walitza, S, Kollias, S, Rossler, W, Heekeren, K (2014). Aberrant coupling within and across the default mode, task-positive, and salience network in subjects at risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40, 10951104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaakub, SN, Dorairaj, K, Poh, JS, Asplund, CL, Krishnan, R, Lee, J, Keefe, RS, Adcock, RA, Wood, SJ, Chee, MW (2013). Preserved working memory and altered brain activation in persons at risk for psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry 170, 12971307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Z, Xu, Y, Xu, T, Hoy, CW, Handwerker, DA, Chen, G, Northoff, G, Zuo, XN, Bandettini, PA (2014). Brain network informed subject community detection in early-onset schizophrenia. Scientific Reports 4, 5549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yung, AR, McGorry, PD, McFarlane, CA, Jackson, HJ, Patton, GC, Rakkar, A (1996). Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 22, 283303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yung, AR, Yuen, HP, McGorry, PD, Phillips, LJ, Kelly, D, Dell'Olio, M, Francey, SM, Cosgrave, EM, Killackey, E, Stanford, C, Godfrey, K, Buckby, J (2005). Mapping the onset of psychosis: the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 39, 964971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Greicius, MD, Gennatas, ED, Growdon, ME, Jang, JY, Rabinovici, GD, Kramer, JH, Weiner, M, Miller, BL, Seeley, WW (2010). Divergent network connectivity changes in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Brain 133, 13521367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Seeley, WW (2014). Network dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia: implications for psychiatry. Biological Psychiatry 75, 565573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y, Liang, M, Tian, L, Wang, K, Hao, Y, Liu, H, Liu, Z, Jiang, T (2007). Functional disintegration in paranoid schizophrenia using resting-state fMRI. Schizophrenia Research 97, 194205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuo, XN, Ehmke, R, Mennes, M, Imperati, D, Castellanos, FX, Sporns, O, Milham, MP (2012). Network centrality in the human functional connectome. Cerebral Cortex 22, 18621875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuo, XN, Xing, XX (2014). Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 45, 100118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of individuals with At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) and healthy control participants in fMRI functional connectivity analysis

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Reduced functional connectivity (FC) to the left ventral anterior insula and disrupted white-matter integrity in At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) subjects compared to healthy controls. Top row: (a) Group-level differences (ARMS < controls) in FC using seeds in the left ventral anterior insula were reported (at a height threshold of p < 0.05 and cluster threshold of p < 0.05 FWE corrected). No FC increase was found in ARMS compared to controls. Bottom row: white-matter tracts where ARMS subjects showed reduced fractional anisotropy (b) and axial diffusivity (c) compared to controls were reported (regions highlighted in blue) at p < 0.05 threshold-free cluster enhancement corrected. ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; BS, brainstem; CC, corpus callosum; CG, cingulate gyrus; CN, caudate nucleus; FM, forceps minor; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; OFC, Orbital frontal cortex; Put, putamen; UF, uncinate fasciculus; l, left; r, right.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Structural dysconnectivity in At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) is closely linked to salience network functional connectivity reductions. Compared to healthy controls, ARMS participants had reduced fractional anisotropy in white-matter tracts (highlighted in blue), which were close to those brain regions (highlighted in orange) showing reduced salience network functional connectivity to the left ventral anterior insula in ARMS. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CC, corpus callosum; CG, cingulate gyrus; FM, forceps minor; OFC, orbital frontal cortex; l, left; r, right.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. White-matter integrity disruption correlates with symptom severity. Clinical severity evaluated by Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) was negatively correlated with fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the white-matter regions with group difference (Fig. 2) (p < 0.05 FWE corrected). FA values in scatter plots are standardized residuals after controlling for age, gender, handedness and ethnicity. ATR, Anterior thalamic radiation; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; UF, uncinated fasciculus.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Functional and structural dysconnectivity predicted psychotic conversion in At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) subjects. Bar charts showing FC between left vAI and right insula as well as FA in the forceps minor of healthy controls (HC), ARMS subjects who transitioned to psychosis (ARMS-T) and ARMS subject who did not make the transition (ARMS-NT). FC or FA values were standardized residuals after controlling for age, gender, handedness and ethnicity. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The significance of pairwise group differences is indicated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. The comparisons between HC and ARMS-T are significant at p < 0.001 for both plots (not marked). All passed the multiple comparison correction (p < 0.05), except the contrast between HC and ARMS-NT for FC. FA, Fractional anisotropy; FC, functional connectivity; vAI, ventral anterior insula.

Supplementary material: File

Wang supplementary material

Wang supplementary material 1

Download Wang supplementary material(File)
File 7 MB
You have Access
Open access
42
Cited by