Skip to main content Accessibility help

A history of the DSM-5 scientific review committee

  • K. S. Kendler (a1)


This article describes the history of the Scientific Review Committee (SRC) for DSM-5 and reviews its background, procedures and deliberative processes, and conceptual/philosophical framework. The results of its work and the most important and contentious issues that arose in its efforts are reviewed. The central role of the SRC was to provide external review for all proposals for diagnostic change in DSM-5, evaluate them on their level of empirical support using objectively structured rules of evidence agreed upon in advance and make appropriate recommendations to the leadership of the American Psychiatric Association. While the creation of the SRC necessitated a great deal of additional work on the part of the SRC, the workgroups and the DSM-5 Task Force, the SRC succeeded in increasing the focus on empirical standards for nosologic change and providing a greater degree of consistency and objectivity in the DSM review process. The article concludes with recommendations, based on lessons learned, for similar efforts that might be included in future iterations of our psychiatric nosology.


Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: K. S. Kendler, M.D., Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics of VCU, Box 980126, Richmond, VA 23298-0126, USA. (Email:


Hide All
Bacon, F (1620). The New Organon. Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing: Indianapolis.
Chang, H (2004). Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford University Press: New York.
Kendler, KS (1980). The nosologic validity of paranoia (simple delusional disorder). A review. Archives of General Psychiatry 37, 699706.
Kendler, KS (2009). An historical framework for psychiatric nosology. Psychological Medicine 39, 19351941.
Kendler, KS (2012). Epistemic iteration as a historical model for psychiatric nosology: promises and limitations. In Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology (ed. Kendler, K. S. and Parnas, J.), pp. 303322. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Kuhn, TS (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn.University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Robins, E, Guze, SB (1970). Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 126, 983987.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Kendler supplementary Appendix
Kendler supplementary Appendix

 Word (83 KB)
83 KB

A history of the DSM-5 scientific review committee

  • K. S. Kendler (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.