Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T10:13:48.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early detection. A defense of our statement that we should not catastrophize a future we cannot reliably predict nor change. A plea for a faster transition of traditional ‘early intervention’ programs for psychosis into new treatment models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2019

Steffen Moritz Open the ORCID record for Steffen Moritz [Opens in a new window] ,
Łukasz Gawęda ,
Andreas Heinz  and
Jürgen Gallinat
Steffen Moritz*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Łukasz Gawęda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Andreas Heinz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz, Berlin, Germany
Jürgen Gallinat
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Steffen Moritz, E-mail: moritz@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Invited Commentary
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , January 2021 , pp. 219 - 222
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajnakina, O., David, A. S., & Murray, R. M. (2019). ‘At risk mental state’ clinics for psychosis – an idea whose time has come – and gone! Psychological Medicine, 49, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition. DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Birchwood, M., & Macmillan, F. (1993). Early intervention in schizophrenia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 27, 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosnjak Kuharic, D., Kekin, I., Hew, J., Rojnic Kuzman, M., & Puljak, L. (2019). Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, CD012236.Google Scholar
Corcoran, C., Malaspina, D., & Hercher, L. (2005). Prodromal interventions for schizophrenia vulnerability: the risks of being ‘at risk’. Schizophrenia Research, 73, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, C. M. (2016). Ethical and epidemiological dimensions of labeling psychosis risk. AMA Journal of Ethics, 18, 633–642.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, C., Cipriani, A., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Radua, J., Stahl, D., Provenzani, U. … Fusar-Poli, P. (2018). Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis. World Psychiatry, 17, 196–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devoe, D. J., Farris, M. S., Townes, P., & Addington, J. (2019). Attenuated psychotic symptom interventions in youth at risk of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 13, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S.-W., Polari, A., Melville, F., Moller, B., Kim, J.-M., Amminger, P. … Nelson, B. (2017). Are current labeling terms suitable for people who are at risk of psychosis? Schizophrenia Research, 188, 172–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miegel, F., Jelinek, L., & Moritz, S. (2019). Dysfunctional beliefs in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression as assessed with the Beliefs Questionnaire (BQ). Psychiatry Research, 272, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, S., Gawęda, Ł, Heinz, A., & Gallinat, J. (2019). Four reasons why early detection centers for psychosis should be renamed and their treatment targets reconsidered: we should not catastrophize a future we can neither reliably predict nor change. Psychological Medicine, 49, 2134–2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. P., Birchwood, M., Pyle, M., Flach, C., Stewart, S. L. K., Byrne, R. … French, P. (2013). Impact of cognitive therapy on internalised stigma in people with at-risk mental states. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, B., Amminger, G. P., & McGorry, P. D. (2018). Recent meta-analyses in the clinical high risk for psychosis population: clinical interpretation of findings and suggestions for future research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieman, D. H., Rike, W. H., Becker, H. E., Dingemans, P. M., van Amelsvoort, T. A., de Haan, L. … Linszen, D. H. (2009). Prescription of antipsychotic medication to patients at ultra high risk of developing psychosis. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rani, F., Murray, M. L., Byrne, P. J., & Wong, I. C. K. (2008). Epidemiologic features of antipsychotic prescribing to children and adolescents in primary care in the United Kingdom. Pediatrics, 121, 1002–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rüsch, N., Heekeren, K., Theodoridou, A., Müller, M., Corrigan, P. W., Mayer, B. … Rössler, W. (2015). Stigma as a stressor and transition to schizophrenia after one year among young people at risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 166, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B. C., Schöttle, D., Hottenrott, B., Gallinat, J., & Moritz, S. (2020). Assessment of adult ADHD in clinical practice: four letters – 40 opinions. Journal of Attention Disorders.Google Scholar
Yang, L. H., Anglin, D. M., Wonpat-Borja, A. J., Opler, M. G., Greenspoon, M., & Corcoran, C. M. (2013). Public stigma associated with psychosis risk syndrome in a college population: implications for peer intervention. Psychiatric Services, 64, 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L. H., Link, B. G., Ben-David, S., Gill, K. E., Girgis, R. R., Brucato, G. … Corcoran, C. M. (2015). Stigma related to labels and symptoms in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 168, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yung, A. R. (2010). Antipsychotic treatment of UHR (‘prodromal’) individuals. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 4, 197–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yung, A. R., Wood, S. J., Malla, A., Nelson, B., McGorry, P., & Shah, J. (2020). The reality of at risk mental state services: a response to recent criticisms. Psychological Medicine.Google Scholar