Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-29T07:30:51.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The efficacy of problem-solving treatments after deliberate self-harm: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with respect to depression, hopelessness and improvement in problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2001

E. TOWNSEND ,
K. HAWTON ,
D. G. ALTMAN ,
E. ARENSMAN ,
D. GUNNELL ,
P. HAZELL ,
A. HOUSE  and
K. VAN HEERINGEN
E. TOWNSEND
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
K. HAWTON
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
D. G. ALTMAN
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
E. ARENSMAN
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
D. GUNNELL
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
P. HAZELL
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
A. HOUSE
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
K. VAN HEERINGEN
Affiliation:
From the Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol and Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Discipline of Psychiatry, Newcastle University of Australia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background. Brief problem-solving therapy is regarded as a pragmatic treatment for deliberate self-harm (DSH) patients. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating this approach indicated a trend towards reduced repetition of DSH but the pooled odds ratio was not statistically significant. We have now examined other important outcomes using this procedure, namely depression, hopelessness and improvement in problems.

Method. Six trials in which problem-solving therapy was compared with control treatment were identified from an extensive literature review of RCTs of treatments for DSH patients. Data concerning depression, hopelessness and improvement in problems were extracted. Where relevant statistical data (e.g. standard deviations) were missing these were imputed using various statistical methods. Results were pooled using meta-analytical procedures.

Results. At follow-up, patients who were offered problem-solving therapy had significantly greater improvement in scores for depression (standardized mean difference =−0·36; 95% CI −0·61 to −0·11) and hopelessness (weighted mean difference =−3·2; 95% CI −4·0 to −2·41), and significantly more reported improvement in their problems (odds ratio = 2·31; 95% CI 1·29 to 4·13), than patients who were in the control treatment groups.

Conclusions. Problem-solving therapy for DSH patients appears to produce better results than control treatment with regard to improvement in depression, hopelessness and problems. It is desirable that this finding is confirmed in a large trial, which will also allow adequate testing of the impact of this treatment on repetition of DSH.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , August 2001 , pp. 979 - 988
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable