Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:20:02.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurocognitive change, functional change and service intensity during community-based psychosocial rehabilitation for schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

J. S. Brekke ,
M. Hoe  and
M. F. Green
J. S. Brekke*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
M. Hoe
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
M. F. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, University of California at Los Angeles, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: J. S. Brekke, Ph.D., Professor, School of Social Work, MC-0411, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0411, USA. (Email: brekke@usc.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

This study examined the magnitude of neurocognitive change during 1 year of community-based psychosocial intervention, whether neurocognitive change and functional change were linked, and how neurocognitive change combined with service intensity to facilitate functional change.

Method

A total of 130 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia were recruited upon admission to four community-based psychosocial rehabilitation programs. Subjects were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months on role functioning and symptom measures. Neurocognition was measured at baseline and 12 months. Service intensity was the number of days of treatment attendance during the study period. Latent mean difference tests and Latent Growth Curve Models (LCGMs) were used to examine the study hypotheses.

Results

There was statistically and clinically significant functional improvement over 12 months. Neurocognition improved significantly over time. Seventy-six (58%) of the sample showed neurocognitive improvement and 54 (42%) did not. There was a significant rate of functional enhancement in the neurocognitive improver group. There was a non-significant rate of functional change in the neurocognitive non-improver group. Neurocognitive improvers showed functional improvement that was 350% greater than neurocognitive non-improvers. Service intensity did not vary between neurocognitive improvers and non-improvers but there was a strong interaction between neurocognitive improvement, service intensity and rate of functional improvement such that service intensity was strongly related to functional improvement for neurocognitive improvers but not for neurocognitive non-improvers. Medication usage and symptomatology did not confound these findings.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that neurocognitive improvement may be a foundation for functional change and treatment responsiveness during community-based psychosocial rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia.

Keywords

Functional changeneurocognitive changepsychosocial rehabilitationschizophrenia
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 39 , Issue 10 , October 2009 , pp. 1637 - 1647
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albus, M, Hubmann, W, Mohr, F, Hecht, S, Hinterberger-Weber, P, Seitz, NN, Küchenhoff, H (2006). Neurocognitive functioning in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 256, 442–451.Google Scholar
Allison, PD (2001). Missing Data. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Anthony, W, Cohen, M, Farkas, M, Gagne, C (2002). Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, JL (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques (ed. Marcoulides, G. A. and Schumacker, R. E.), pp. 243–277. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, JL (2006). Amos 7.0 User's Guide. SPSS: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Barton, R (1999). Psychosocial rehabilitation services in community support systems: a review of outcomes and policy recommendations. Psychiatric Services 50, 525–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellack, AS, Mueser, KT (1993). Psychosocial treatment for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 19, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollen, KA, Curran, PJ (2006). Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Bond, GR, McGrew, JH, Fekete, DM (1995). Assertive outreach for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Mental Health Administration 22, 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brekke, JS, Ansel, M, Long, JD, Slade, E, Weinstein, M (1999). Intensity and continuity of services and functional outcomes in the rehabilitation of persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 50, 248–256.Google Scholar
Brekke, JS, Hoe, M, Long, JD, Green, MF (2007). How neurocognition and social cognition influence functional change during community-based psychosocial rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33, 1247–1256.Google Scholar
Brekke, JS, Kay, DD, Kee, KS, Green, MF (2005). Biosocial pathways to functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 80, 213–235.Google Scholar
Brekke, JS, Levin, S, Wolkon, G, Sobel, G, Slade, B (1993). Psychosocial functioning and subjective experience in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 19, 599–608.Google Scholar
Brekke, JS, Long, JD (2000). Community-based psychological rehabilitation and prospective change in functional, clinical, and subjective experience variables in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 667–680.Google Scholar
Brekke, JS, Long, JD, Nesbitt, N, Sobel, E (1997 a). The impact of service characteristics on functional outcomes from community support programs for persons with schizophrenia: a growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65, 464–475.Google Scholar
Brekke, JS, Raine, A, Ansel, M, Lencz, T, Bird, L (1997 b). Neuropsychological and psychophysiological correlates of psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 23, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bustillo, JR, Lauriello, J, Horan, WP, Keith, SJ (2001). The psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia: an update. American Journal of Psychiatry 158, 163–175.Google Scholar
Byrne, BM, Watkins, D (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, DC, Kramer, JH, Kaplan, E, Ober, BA (1987). California Verbal Learning Test. The Psychological Corporation: Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
Dickerson, F, Boronow, JJ, Ringel, N, Parente, F (1999). Social functioning and neurocognitive deficits in outpatients with schizophrenia: a 2-year follow-up. Schizophrenia Research 37, 13–20.Google Scholar
Dixon, L (2000). Assertive community treatment: twenty-five years of gold. Psychiatric Services 51, 759–765.Google Scholar
Drake, RE, Green, AI, Mueser, KT, Goldman, HH (2003). The history of community mental health treatment and rehabilitation for persons with severe mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal 39, 427–440.Google Scholar
Duncan, TE, Duncan, SC, Strycker, LA (2006). An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Gold, JM (2004). Cognitive deficits as treatment targets in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 72, 21–28.Google Scholar
Gold, JM, Goldberg, RW, McNary, SW, Dixon, LB, Lehman, AF (2002). Cognitive correlates of job tenure among patients with severe mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 159, 1395–1402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, TE, Goldman, RS, Burdick, KE, Malhotra, AK, Lencz, T, Patel, RC, Woerner, MG, Schooler, NR, Kane, JM, Robinson, DG (2007). Cognitive improvement after treatment with second-generation antipsychotic medications in first-episode schizophrenia: is it a practice effect? Archives of General Psychiatry 64, 1115–1122.Google Scholar
Goodman, SH, Sewell, DR, Cooley, EL, Leavitt, N (1993). Assessing levels of adaptive functioning: the role functioning scale. Community Mental Health Journal 29, 119–131.Google Scholar
Green, MF, Kern, RS, Braff, DL, Mintz, J (2000). Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the ‘right stuff’? Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, MF, Kern, RS, Heaton, RK (2004). Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophrenia Research 72, 41–51.Google Scholar
Green, MF, Nuechterlein, KH (1999). Should schizophrenia be treated as a neurocognitive disorder? Schizophrenia Bulletin 25, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, RS, Gracely, EJ (1987). Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally ill. Community Mental Health Journal 23, 91–102.Google Scholar
Harvey, PD, Patterson, TL, Potter, LS, Zhong, K, Brecher, M (2006). Improvement in social competence with short-term atypical antipsychotic treatment: a randomized, double-blind comparison of quetiapine versus risperidone for social competence, social cognition, and neuropsychological functioning. American Journal Psychiatry 163, 1918–1925.Google Scholar
Heaton, RK (1981). A Manual for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
Horn, JL, McArdle, JJ (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research 18, 117–144.Google Scholar
Keefe, RSE, Sweeney, JA, Gu, H, Hamer, RM, Perkins, DO, McEvoy, JP, Lieberman, JA (2007). Effects of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone on neurocognitive function in early psychosis: a randomized, double-blind 52-week comparison. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 1061–1071.Google Scholar
Klein, JA, Jones, TA (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51, S225–S239.Google Scholar
Kline, RB (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Kopelowicz, A, Liberman, RP, Zarate, R (2006). Recent advances in social skills training for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32 (Suppl. 1), S12–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtz, MM, Moberg, PJ, Gur, RC, Gur, RE (2001). Approaches to cognitive remediation of neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review 11, 197–210.Google Scholar
Lezak, MD (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Little, RJA, Rubin, DB (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley-Interscience: New York.Google Scholar
Lukoff, D, Gioia-Hasick, D, Sullivan, G, Golden, JS, Nuechterlein, KH (1986). Sex education and rehabilitation with schizophrenic male outpatients. Schizophrenia Bulletin 12, 669–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malla, AK, Norman, RMG, Manchanda, R, Townsend, L (2002). Symptoms, cognition, treatment adherence and functional outcome in first-episode psychosis. Psychological Medicine 32, 1109–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArdle, JJ, Woodcock, RW (1997). Expanding test–retest designs to include developmental time-lag components. Psychological Methods 2, 403–435.Google Scholar
McGurk, SR, Mueser, KT, Feldman, K, Wolfe, R, Pascaris, A (2007 b). Cognitive training for supported employment: 2–3 year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 437–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGurk, SR, Twamley, EW, Sitzer, DI, McHugo, GJ, Mueser, KT (2007 a). A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 1791–1802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueser, KT, Bond, GR, Drake, RE, Resnick, SG (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin 24, 37–74.Google Scholar
Mueser, KT, McGurk, SR (2004). Schizophrenia. Lancet 363, 2063–2072.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, KH, Asarnow, RF (1992). UCLA Continuous Performance Test [manual and computer program]. University of California: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Olfson, M (1990). Assertive community treatment: an evaluation of the experimental evidence. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41, 634–651.Google Scholar
Oltmanns, TF, Neale, JM (1975). Schizophrenic performance when distractors are present: attentional deficit or differential task difficulty? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 84, 205–209.Google Scholar
Penn, DL, Mueser, KT (1996). Research update on the psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 153, 607–617.Google Scholar
Penn, DL, Spaulding, W, Reed, D, Sullivan, M, Mueser, KT, Hope, DA (1997). Cognition and social functioning in schizophrenia. Psychiatry 60, 281–291.Google Scholar
Ployhart, RE, Oswald, FL (2004). Applications of mean and covariance structure analysis: integrating correlational and experimental approaches. Organizational Research Methods 7, 27–65.Google Scholar
Pukrop, R, Schultze-Lutter, F, Ruhrmann, S, Brockhaus-Dumke, A, Tendolkar, I, Bechdolf, A, Matuschek, E, Klosterkötter, J (2006). Neurocognitive functioning in subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis compared with first- and multiple-episode schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 28, 1388–1407.Google Scholar
Scott, JE, Dixon, LB (1995). Assertive community treatment and case management for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 21, 657–668.Google Scholar
Solomon, P (1992). The efficacy of case management services for severely mentally disabled clients. Community Mental Health Journal 28, 163–180.Google Scholar
Spaulding, WD, Reed, D, Sullivan, M, Richardson, C, Weiler, M (1999). Effects of cognitive treatment in psychiatric rehabilitation. Schizophrenia Bulletin 25, 657–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, JS, Carpenter, WT (1972). The prediction of outcome in schizophrenia: I. Characteristics of outcome. Archives of General Psychiatry 27, 739–746.Google Scholar
Test, MA (1992). Training in community living. In Handbook of Psychiatric Rehabilitation (ed. Liberman, R. P.), pp. 221–242. Allyn and Bacon: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Test, MA, Knoedler, WH, Allness, DJ, Burke, SS, Brown, RL, Wallisch, LS (1991). Long-term community care through an assertive continuous treatment team. In Advances in Neuropsychiatry and Psychopharmacology: Schizophrenia Research (ed. Tamminga, C. and Schulz), S., vol. I, pp. 239–246. Raven Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Twamley, EW, Jeste, DV, Bellack, AS (2003). A review of cognitive training in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 29, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velligan, DI, Bow-Thomas, CC, Mahurin, RK, Miller, AL, Halgunseth, LC (2000). Do specific neurocognitive deficits predict specific domains of community function in schizophrenia? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 188, 518–524.Google Scholar
Ventura, J, Green, MF, Shaner, A, Liberman, RP (1995). Training and quality assurance with the brief psychiatric rating scale: ‘the drift busters’. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 3, 221–244.Google Scholar
Young, AS, Sullivan, G, Murata, D, Sturm, D, Koegel, P (1998). Implementing publicly funded risk contracts with community mental health organizations. Psychiatric Services 49, 1579–1584.Google Scholar