Skip to main content

Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources

  • N. J. Reavley (a1), A. J. Mackinnon (a1), A. J. Morgan (a1), M. Alvarez-Jimenez (a1), S. E. Hetrick (a1), E. Killackey (a1), B. Nelson (a1), R. Purcell (a1), M. B. H. Yap (a1) and A. F. Jorm (a1)...

Although mental health information on the internet is often of poor quality, relatively little is known about the quality of websites, such as Wikipedia, that involve participatory information sharing. The aim of this paper was to explore the quality of user-contributed mental health-related information on Wikipedia and compare this with centrally controlled information sources.


Content on 10 mental health-related topics was extracted from 14 frequently accessed websites (including Wikipedia) providing information about depression and schizophrenia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, and a psychiatry textbook. The content was rated by experts according to the following criteria: accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability.


Ratings varied significantly between resources according to topic. Across all topics, Wikipedia was the most highly rated in all domains except readability.


The quality of information on depression and schizophrenia on Wikipedia is generally as good as, or better than, that provided by centrally controlled websites, Encyclopaedia Britannica and a psychiatry textbook.

Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Dr N. J. Reavley, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Locked Bag 10, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (Email:
Hide All
Banaji M (2011). Harnessing the power of Wikipedia for scientific psychology: a call to action. In Observer , vol. 24, issue no. 2. Association for Psychological Science: Washington, DC.
Clauson KA, Polen HH, Boulos MN, Dzenowagis JH (2008). Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42, 18141821.
Coquard O, Fernandez S, Zullino D, Khazaal Y (2011). A follow-up study on the quality of alcohol dependence-related information on the web. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 6, 13.
Czarnecka-Kujawa K, Abdalian R, Grover SC (2008). The quality of open access and open source internet material in gastroenterology: is Wikipedia appropriate for knowledge transfer to patients? Gastroenterology 134, A-325–A-326.
Devgan L, Powe N, Blakey B, Makary M (2007). Wiki-Surgery? Internal validity of Wikipedia as a medical and surgical reference. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 205, S76S77.
Eysenbach G, Kohler C (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal 324, 573577.
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER (2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 26912700.
Fox S (2006). Online Health Search 2006. Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, DC.
Friedlin J, McDonald CJ (2010). An evaluation of medical knowledge contained in Wikipedia and its use in the LOINC database. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 17, 283287.
Frishauf P (2006). Are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete? MedGenMed: Medscape General Medicine 8, 5.
Frost JH, Massagli MP, Wicks P, Heywood J (2008). How the social web supports patient experimentation with a new therapy: the demand for patient-controlled and patient-centered informatics. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 6 November, pp. 217221.
Giles J (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900901.
Haigh CA (2010). Wikipedia as an evidence source for nursing and healthcare students. Nurse Education Today 31, 135139.
Heilman JM, Kemmann E, Bonert M, Chatterjee A, Ragar B, Beards GM, Iberri DJ, Harvey M, Thomas B, Stomp W, Martone MF, Lodge DJ, Vondracek A, de Wolff JF, Liber C, Grover SC, Vickers TJ, Mesko B, Laurent MR (2011). Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, e14.
Internet World Statistics (2011). Internet Usage Statistics. Miniwatts Marketing Group ( Accessed 29 April 2011.
Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F (2002). Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 27862790.
Jorm AF, Fischer JA, Oh E (2010). Effect of feedback on the quality of suicide prevention websites: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 197, 7374.
Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, Hoch A, Khankarli MB, Khan R, Zullino DF (2008). Internet use by patients with psychiatric disorders in search for general and medical informations. Psychiatric Quarterly 79, 301309.
Kim JY, Gudewicz TM, Dighe AS, Gilbertson JR (2010). The pathology informatics curriculum wiki: harnessing the power of user-generated content. Journal of Pathology Informatics 1, 10.
Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr., Rogers RL, Chissom BS (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. National Technical Information Service: Springfield, VA.
Kummervold PE, Chronaki CE, Lausen B, Prokosch HU, Rasmussen J, Santana S, Staniszewski A, Wangberg SC (2008). eHealth trends in Europe 2005–2007: a population-based survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 10, e42.
Laurent MR, Vickers TJ (2009). Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16, 471479.
McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1, 3046.
National Work Group on Literacy and Health (1998). Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills. Report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health. Journal of Family Practice 46, 168176.
Netcraft (2011). April 2011 Web Server Survey ( Accessed 29 April 2011.
Office for National Statistics (1996). Adult Literacy Survey: Literacy Level of Adults by Gender and Age. Office for National Statistics: London, UK.
Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL (2003). Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine 348, 721726.
Pender MP, Lasserre KE, Del Mar C, Kruesi L, Anuradha S (2009). Is Wikipedia unsuitable as a clinical information resource for medical students? Medical Teacher 31, 10951096.
Powell J, Clarke A (2006). Internet information-seeking in mental health: population survey. British Journal of Psychiatry 189, 273277.
Rajagopalan MS, Khanna V, Stott M, Leiter Y, Showalter TN, Dicker A (2010). Accuracy of cancer information on the Internet: a comparison of a Wiki with a professionally maintained database. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7 (Suppl.), Abstract 6058.
Reavley NJ, Jorm AF (2011). The quality of mental disorder information websites: a review. Patient Education and Counseling 85, e16e25.
Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P, Kaplan HI (eds) (2009). Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 9th edn. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA.
Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, Fishwick L (2007). How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Social Science and Medicine 64, 18531862.
Singer JD, Willett JB (2003). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Ybarra ML, Suman M (2006). Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 2941.
Zickhur L, Rainie L (2011). Wikipedia: Past and Present. Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, DC.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Psychological Medicine
  • ISSN: 0033-2917
  • EISSN: 1469-8978
  • URL: /core/journals/psychological-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1530 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.